Chennai Court March 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
S.Prabakar Vs. It Expressway Ltd.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-12-2012
Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent herein to refund a sum of Rs.2,45,796/- to the petitioner which was deducted towards non-submission of ESIC and PF codes, in respect of the contract agreement dated 9.4.2009 for construction of culvert extension.ORDER1. Heard Mr.G.Arul Murugan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.V.Ramajagadeesan, learned counsel for the respondent.2. The petitioner has sought for a direction to the respondent to refund a sum of Rs.2,45,796/- to the petitioner which was deducted towards non-submission of ESIC and PF codes, in respect of the contract agreement dated 9.4.2009 for construction of culvert extension.3. According to the petitioner, he is a contractor engaged in doing civil contract work. The respondent called for a tender for construction of Culvert Extension including duct banks, data cable chamber, E.B. cable chamber on Rajiv Gandhi Salai in Chennai. The ...
N.Vijayalakshmi Vs. the District Collector
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-12-2012
JUDGMENT(Judgment of the Court was made by CHITRA VENKATARAMAN,J.)1. The writ appeal is filed against the order passed in W.P.(MD)No.3236 of 2011, dated 03.11.2011, wherein the writ appellant, as writ petitioner, sought for quashing of the proceedings relating to the appointment of the 4th respondent as an Anganwadi Organizer in the Child Centre at Koovanuthupudur in Dindigul District. The order appointing the 4th respondent was made on 23.02.2011.2.The appellant's contention is that the 4th respondent does not come within the distance zone as given in G.O.Ms.No.237, Social Welfare (Noon-Meal) Department, dated 18.08.1997, to qualify for appointment to the post of Anganwadi Organizer and that the said respondent resides in another village. It is stated that the appellant had completed her +2 Course and presently doing B.B.A. Degree in Madurai Kamaraj University. In the circumstances, the appellant contended that she is better qualified than the 4th respondent. Learned Single Judge poin...
A.R.S.Metals Ltd Vs. Regional Transport Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-12-2012
This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the order passed by the respondent in VIR No.A 2995106 dated 3.3.2012 and quash the same and to direct the respondent to release the motor vehicle namely Mercedes Benz S 350 CDIL bearing Registration No.PY01BL-0333.O R D E R1. At this stage of the hearing of the Writ Petition, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner had submitted that it would suffice if the petitioner is permitted to furnish all the necessary documents to substantiate its claims, made in its representation, dated 5.3.2012, and if the respondent is directed to consider the same and pass appropriate orders thereon, after giving opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.2. The learned counsel had also submitted that the respondent may be directed to release the vehicle in question, on the petitioner depositing the original Registration Certificate relating t...
While O.A.No.786 of 2011 In
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-12-2012
ORDER1. While O.A.No.786 of 2011 in CS.No.631 of 2011 is filed by the plaintiff for granting ad interim injunction restraining the defendants 1 and 2 from in anyway or in any form adopting, using, misusing or abusing the plaintiff's flag or the colour of the flag as registered and recognised by the Election Commission of India in its proceedings dated 10.12.1991, A.No.365 of 2012 is filed by the 2nd defendant to vacate the interim injunction already granted by this Court in O.A.No.786 of 2011.2.The parties are referred to herein as per their rank in the main suit.3.Few facts, which are relevant for consideration herein are as follows:The plaintiff by name Tamil Nadu Peasants & Workers Party and the defendants 1 and 2 by name (i) Kongu Naadu Munnettra Peravi and (ii) Kongu Naadu Munnettra Kazhagam respectively are the registered, but unrecognised political parties registered under Section 29-A of the Representation of Peoples Act (hereinafter shortly referred to as 'RP Act'). Wh...
Ms.Ekta Road Lines Vs. Deputy Commercial Tax Officer
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-12-2012
PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the respondent in his proceedings, in G.D.No.218/2011-12 dated 02.03.2012 and quash this detention order as illegal and contrary to the provisions of the TNVAT Act and direct the respondent to release the goods by collecting security as per Rule 15(6) (a) & (b) of Tamil Nadu VAT Rules.ORDER1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondent.2. By consent of both the parties, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal.3. In view of the similar orders passed by this Court, in a number of writ petitions, including the order, dated 21.12.2010, made in W.P.No.29050 of 2010, the following order is passed:i) The petitioner shall pay a sum of Rs.91,743/-, which is the amount of tax demanded by the authority concerned, while passing the detention order.ii) On payme...
Veerappan and ors. Vs. the Inspector of Police.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-12-2012
JUDGMENTG.M. AKBAR ALI,J.,1. The conviction and sentence passed by the learned III Additional Sessions Judge, Puducherry in S.C.No.34 of 2009 dated 30.11.2010. against the following accused are detailed hereunder: S.NoOffenceAgainst accusedConviction and Sentence148 IPCA.1 to A.173 Yrs R.I and fine of Rs.1000/-each, i/d 6 months S.I452 r/w 149 IPCA.1 to A.177 Yrs R.I and fine of Rs.1000/-each, i/d 6 months S.I324 r/w 149 IPCA.3, A.8 to A.11, A.15 and A.162 Yrs R.I and fine of Rs.1000/-each i/d 6 months S.I326 r/w 149 IPCA.1 to A.5, A.9, A.14, A.16 and A.177 yrs R.I and fine of Rs.1000/-each, i/d 6 months S.I302 r/w 34 IPCA.1, A.2, A.10, A.11Life and fine of Rs.1000/-each, i/d 6 months S.I2. The case of the prosecution, in a nutshell, is as follows:(a) The prosecution party and the appellants belong to Pillaiyar kuppam village of Puducherry. Both belong to two rival political groups.(b) According to the prosecution, on 27.10.2008, at about 6.00 p.m., when P.W.1 was proceeding towards hi...
Ms.Sujana Industries Limited Vs. the Assistant Commissioner.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-12-2012
This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the respondent in TNGST No.1200823/2000-01 dated 5.12.2011 and to quash the same as illegal and contrary to the principles of natural justice and against the provisions of the TNGST Act, 1959 and further direct the respondent to pass a fresh de-nova assessment after return of the 3 CPU's seized at the time of inspection of the petitioner's premises on 28.3.2003.O R D E R1. Heard the learned counsels appearing for both sides.2. The learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner had submitted that the impugned assessment order, dated 5.12.2011, had been passed by the respondent, without furnishing to the petitioner the copies of the documents recovered by the respondent during the inspection conducted, on 27.3.2003, as directed by this Court, by its order, dated 13.2.2008, made in W.P.No.3715 of 2008. Therefore, this Cour...
M.S.Vijayakumar Vs. the Chairman and Managing Director.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-12-2012
Writ Petition filed for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the Second respondent in sanction order dated 19.03.2005 and to quash the decision taken thereon sanctioning prosecution under Section 19(1)(C) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 against the petitioner.COMMON ORDER(Order of the Court was made by P.JYOTHIMANI ,J.,)1. The appeal arises from the order of the learned Single Judge dated 06.01.2010 made in W.P.No.22472 of 2009 filed by the appellant herein, in and by which the learned Judge, while dismissing the writ petition, has held that the order of sanction to prosecute the appellant has been made with independent application of mind supported by reasons and charge sheet has already been filed.2.The appellant has served the respondent/Bank for a period of 33 years under various positions. While he was working as Chief Manager of Indira Nagar Branch, Chennai, in the year 2005, an explanation was called for in respect of some of the commissions and ...
Dr.T.Arutselvam. Vs. Nagapattinam Co-operative.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-12-2012
Writ petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the production of the records relating to the order dated 20.1.2012 made in F.No.R-17013/03/2011-EP (IM-I) passed by the fifth respondent herein, quash the same in so far as M.D.(Siddha) Courses at Government Siddha Medical College for the Palayamkottai for the year 2011-2012 is concerned and direct the fifth and sixth respondents to grant permission and allow the students to undergo and complete M.D. (Siddha) Course at Government Siddha Medical College, Palayamkottai for the academic year 2011-2012. WP No.4452/2012:Writ petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for issue of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the production of the records relating to the order dated 20.1.2012 made in F.No.R-17013/03/2011-EP (IM-I) passed by the fifth respondent herein, quash the same in so far as B.A.M.S. Course at Government Ayurveda Med...
Ms.A.V.R.Agencies Vs. the Assistant Commissioner (Ct)
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-12-2012
This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the respondent in his proceedings in TIN No.33312307260/2006-07 quash the order dated 10.08.2011 issued therein and further direct the respondent to issue 3 Nos.Form F Declarations to the petitioner in relation to the Assessment year TNVAT 2006-07 as requested by the petitioner in their letter dated 12.04.2011. W.P.No.3167 of 2012:This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the respondent in his proceedings in TIN No.33312307260/2007-08 quash the order dated 10.08.2011 issued therein and further direct the respondent to issue 30 Nos.Form F Declarations and 2 Nos. Form C Declarations to the petitioner in relation to the Assessment year TNVAT 2007-08 as requested by the petitioner in their letter dated 12.04....
- ‹ Prev
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- Next ›
- Last »