Chennai Court November 2012 Judgments

P. Rajendran Vs. the Member-secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Developmen ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2013(2)MLJ267

(Prayer: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of certiorari, calling for the records of the first respondent in Memo No.E6/1693/2011 dated 25.10.2012 and quash the same.) The petitioner has filed the writ petition, seeking to challenge an order dated 25.10.2012 issued by the first respondent viz., Member-Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (for short CMDA), wherein and by which, he had posted one B.Ravichandran, Planning Assistant Grade II, Enforcement Cell as Planning Officer to St.Thomas Mount Panchayat Union and Chitlapakkam Town Panchayat on working arrangement in the place of the petitioner, who is said to be under suspension. The said Ravichandran, who is now been posted has been made as 5th respondent in the writ petition. It was also stated that he has to visit St.Thomas Mount Panchayat Union on all Mondays to Thursdays and Chitlapakkam Town Panchayat on all Fridays. 2. It is not clear as to how the petitioner has chosen t...

T. Kannammal Vs. the Chairman State Level Scrutiny Committee Adi Dravi ...

Court: Chennai

(PETITION under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of certiorari to call for the impugned order of the respondent in its proceedings No. 15186/ CVIII/ 2008-9 dated 28.9.2011 and quash the same.) CHITRA VENKATARAMAN, J. The petitioner seeks writ of certiorari to quash the impugned order of the respondent dated 28.9.2011, whereby the respondent herein has rejected the prayer of the petitioner for issuing community certificate that she belongs to 'Kondareddis' community. 2. It is seen from the narration of the facts that as early as 1993, the Collector, Coimbatore has cancelled the community certificate of the petitioner. Challenging the same, the petitioner filed the writ petition in W.P.No.6853 of 1993, wherein this Court directed the petitioner to submit an appeal to the State Level Scrutiny Committee. In the year 2009, the State Level Scrutiny Committee called upon the petitioner to appear for verification afresh. Ultimately on 30.7.2009,...

E. Ponnu Rangam Vs. the District Manager, 'TASMAC' Ltd., Thiruvannamal ...

Court: Chennai

(Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed in Na.Ka.R.V.2/57/2006, dated 14.12.2007 on the file of the first respondent to quash the same and direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner as a salesman in the same shop or any other shop with all consequential benefits attached to the said post and grant such other reliefs.) With the consent of both parties, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal. 2. The writ petition has been filed seeking direction to the respondents to reinstate the petitioner as Salesman in the same shop or any other shop with all consequential benefits attached to the said post and quash the impugned order passed by the first respondent in Na.Ka.R.V.2/57/2006, dated 14.12.2007. 3. The petitioner was appointed as Salesman in TASMAC Shop No.9518 by the first respondent in his proceedings in No.Na...

C. Velusamy, Ex.Driver Vs. the Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Tra ...

Court: Chennai

(Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for issue of writ of mandamus directing the respondent to issue necessary orders for employment to the petitioners as per the interview conducted by the respondent in proceedings No.652/E3Aa/51Aa/Pa.thul/THA.Aa.Po.KA.(ko) 2012 dated 30.8.2012 and if the petitioners are selected to provide the duty or not selected, the respondent directed to give a first preference and select and provide the duty to the petitioners within a time frame.) COMMON ORDER The petitioners in these writ petitions, claiming to be the ex-drivers and conductors in the respondent State owned Transport Corporation, having head quarters at Coimbatore, have filed these writ petitions for the identical relief, namely, they must be given employment pursuant to the interview letter sent to them and if they are selected duty must be provided to them, and if not selected, the respondent must be directed to give first preference to them and select and p...

N. Ismail Rep. by His Power of Attorney, N. Abdul Rahman Koya and Othe ...

Court: Chennai

(Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying this Court to issue a writ of Certiorari calling for the records of proceedings of the first respondent in G.O.No.168 Revenue (LD-I(1) Department, dated 21.5.2012 and the consequential proceedings of the third respondent in A1/29306/2011 dated 21.6.2012 and proceedings of the second respondent comprised in Notice ROC.No.2314/2012/OTHC, dated 25.6.2012, quash the same. Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying this Court to issue a writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the fifth respondent relating to the Notice NO.A1/29306/2011 dated 21.6.2012 and quash the same. Prayer: This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying this Court to issue a writ of Certiorarified mandamus calling for the records of the first respondent in G.O.No.168, Revenue (LD-I(1)) department, dated 21.5.2012 and the consequential proce...

D. Usharani Vs. the Chairman, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board and Another

Court: Chennai

(Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking for issue of writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the entire records on the file of the 2nd respondent pursuant to the selection list of Four hundred and ten Assistant Engineer by direct recruitment-2012 published on 6.7.2012 in internet and quash the same in so far as it omits to reserve 3% for the Differently Abled Category is concerned and consequently direct the respondents to consider the petitioner for the post of Assistant Engineer under 3% reservation for Differently Abled persons as per the Persons with Disabilities (Equal opportunities, Production of Rights and Full participation) Act, 1955 Section 32 and 33.) In this writ petition, the petitioner seeks for a direction to set aside the selection list of 410 Assistant Engineers by direct recruitment, right from the year 2012, published on 6.10.2012, in the internet and questions the said list in so far as it omits to reserve 3% for the Differently Ab...

K.K. Subramaniam Vs. the Executive Engineer (O and M), Tamil Nadu Elec ...

Court: Chennai

(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the entire records relating to the impugned order passed by the respondent in his proceedings No.EE/O & N/Nae.Ka./Ka.Mae/U/A.No.1384/12, dated 06.10.2012 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to shift over the electricity service connection in S.C.Nos.30 and 294 situated in the open wells in S.F.Nos.257/1A and 257/1C at Periya Negamam Village, Pollachi Taluk, Coimbatore District to the borewells situated in S.F.Nos.274/1C and 282/1 at Periya Negamam Village, Pollachi Taluk, Coimbatore District.) ORDER 1. Challenging the order passed by the respondent in his proceedings No.EE/O & N/Nae.Ka./Ka.Mae/U/A.No.1384/12, dated 06.10.2012, seeking to quash the same and for a consequential direction to the respondent to shift over the electricity service connection in S.C.Nos.30 and 294 situated in the open wells in S.F.Nos.257/1...

Sun Tv Network Ltd Vs. M.V.R.S. Prasad and Others

Court: Chennai

The plaintiff / applicant has moved this application under Order XIV Rule Rule 8 of the O.S.Rules r/w Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure for interim injunction restraining respondent no.1, Sun TV Network Ltd., its agents and servants, any person and every person claiming through it or under it from in any manner exhibiting exploiting and / or distributing the copy right in the Tamil feature film "Kaavalan" starring Vijay and Asin and others in its Television Network or in any other Television Network, Direct to Home Broadcast, Direct Satellite Service, Terrestrial Television Broadcast and / or in any form of satellite telecasting or broadcasting by means of wireless diffusion and communication to the public all over the world pending disposal of the suit. 2. The plaintiff / applicant filed a suit for permanent injunction, restraining respondent no.1, Sun TV Network Ltd., its agents and servants, any person and every person claiming through it or under it from in any ...

R. Indu Vs. the Tamil Nadu Dr.M.G.R. Medical University, Rep. by Its R ...

Court: Chennai

(PRAYER: W.P.No.30080 of 2012: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned guidelines of the 1st respondent - University dated 14.01.2011 in Ref.Rc.No.ACAD-1(3)/18100/10, and quash the same, and direct the respondents 1 & 2 to follow the Regulation 12(4) of the Medical Council of India Regulations 1997 (as amended upto 2010), and consequently declare the petitioner having Regn.No.52118340 as pass in the subjects “Anatomy and Physiology including Bio-Physics” in the first year MBBS examination 2011-12, and consequently direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to continue her MBBS second year course forthwith. ) COMMON ORDER: THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE & T.S. SIVAGNANAM, J. Since, all these writ petitions have been filed challenging the impugned guidelines dated 14.01.2011 in Ref.Rc.No.ACAD-1(3)/18100/10 issued by the respondent Dr.M.G.R.Medi...

P.V. Ragunathan Vs. the Commissioner, Prohibition and Excise Departmen ...

Court: Chennai

(Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the first respondent's proceedings in k(k)M/2(1)/457/2012 dated 05.10.2012 signed on 5.11.2012 served the petitioner on 12.11.2012 and quash the same) This Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the first respondent's proceedings in k(k)M/2(1)/457/2012 dated 05.10.2012 signed on 5.11.2012 served the petitioner on 12.11.2012 and quash the same. 2. Heard the spirited arguments of Mr.A.Sivaji, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.N.Srinivasan, learned Additional Government Pleader, appearing for the respondents. 3. The writ petition deserves to be allowed on the short point that the impugned order has been passed without application of mind and without stating any reasons. In this case the show-cause notice has been issued on 3.7.2012 and the petitioner submitted an explanation toge...