Chennai Court November 2012 Judgments

Antony Bennet Alias B. Bobby F/N: Denny Cine and Tv Dancers Dance Dire ...

Court: Chennai

The plaintiffs / applicants have filed a suit for declaration to challenge the continuation of defendant nos.2 to 21 as Office Bearers of Cine & TV Dancer's and Dance Director's Association beyond 13.06.2012, on the ground that the term of the Office Bearers ended on 13.06.2012. Inspite of end of tenure, the Office Bearers of the association have failed to hold election within the time stipulated as per the Bye-Laws. The consequential relief sought is for permanent injunction, restraining defendants 2 to 21 from continuing as Office Bearers. 2. It is the submission of plaintiffs / applicants, that the term of office of the respondents 2 to 21 was over on 13.06.2012, but by passing a resolution, the term of Office Bearers was extended illegally by one year. 3. This fact is disputed by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents / defendants, by contending that the term was extended only for four months to avoid vacuum, as the elections were not held for the reason...

Oriental Insurance Co., Ltd. Vellore Vs. Ponraj and Others

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2013(1)LW770

(Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the Award dated 21.04.1999 and made in M.C.O.P.No.125 of 1998, on the file of the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Additional District Judge-cum-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Villupuram) 1.The memorandum of civil revision is directed against the Award dated 21.04.1999 and made in M.C.O.P.No.125 of 1998, on the file of the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Additional District Judge-cum-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Villupuram. 2. The revision petitioner herein is the second respondent in the claim petition. 3. The first respondent herein seems to have filed the claim petition in M.C.O.P.No.125 of 1998, on the file of the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Additional District Judge-cum-Chief Judicial Magistrate, Villupuram, claiming a sum of Rs.15,000/- for the injuries sustained by him in a road traffic accident, which is said to have been taken place on 13.05.1991 involving two lorries viz., TCF ...

A. Maran Vs. Directorate of Medical Education, Kilpauk and Another

Court: Chennai

(PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the orders passed by the 2nd respondent in Letter No.38600/C2/2011-2 dated 10.01.2012 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to consider the petitioner for appointment to the post of "Non Medical Assistant to the Professor of Bio-Chemistry" in the available vacancies notified for the panel year 2011-2012 by way of recruitment by transfer from other category of the services as per Special Rules for Tamil Nadu Medical Subordinate Services, by considering the representation made by the petitioner dated 07.09.2011. The petitioner was appointed as Lab Technician (GradeII) on 29.11.1991 in the Directorate of Medical Education. He was promoted to the post of Lab Technician (GradeI) on 29.12.1995. He is presently working in Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital, Chennai. According to him, he is eligib...

Babu @ Shahabudeen Vs. S.M. Rizwannul Hug

Court: Chennai

(Prayer: Petition filed under Sections 397 read with 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code against the Judgment dated 04.04.2008 made in Criminal Appeal No. 118 of 2007 on the file of the First Additional District & Sessions Court, Erode, confirming the order dated 25.04.2007 made in C.C. No. 468 of 2006 on the file of the Second Additional District Munsif Court, Erode.) 1. In the proceedings initiated by the respondent herein under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in C.C. No. 468 of 2006 on the file of the Second Additional District Munsif Court, Erode. by judgment dated 25.04.2007, the petitioner suffered conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and sentenced to undergo six months simple imprisonment with fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default to undergo three months simple imprisonment. The petitioner unsuccessfully appealed thereagainst by filing Criminal Appeal No. 118 of 2007 before the Appellate Court, as it was dismissed on 04.04.2008 confirming the conv...

D.K. Samy Matriculation Higher Secondary School, Rep.by Its Correspond ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2013(1)CWC193

(Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution. In W.P.No.16242 of 2002, it has been prayed to issue a Writ of Declaration, declaring the G.O.Ms.No.188 School Education (uj2) Department, dated 8.11.2001 of the first respondent, insofar as it enhances the various fees payable by the Matriculation Schools including the demand of separate additional fees from the Matriculation Schools and authorised the Director of Matriculation Schools to amend the Code relating to regulation of Matriculation schools as illegal, arbitrary and without legislative sanction and excessive delegation of the essential legislative functions on the second respondent against the provisions of Article 162 of the Constitution f India and against the Tamil Nadu Recognised Private Schools (Regulation) Act 1973 and the Rules 1974 and the consequential proceedings of the second respondent seeking to regulate the existing Matriculation Schools, prescribing additional conditions of recognition by various pro...

J. Subramaniam Advocate and Others Vs. the Manager M/S. Bharati Airtel ...

Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai

(Theses petition coming before us for hearing finally today. Upon hearing the arguments of the counsel on either side, perusing the documents, lower court records, and the order passed by the District Forum, this commission made the following order:) JUSTICE R. REGUPATHI, PRESIDENT 1. The District Forum, and the office of this Commission, declined to entertain the complaints preferred against various service providers of telecommunication, under Sec.12 and 17 of Consumer Protection Act, in view of Sec.7B of Indian Telegraph Act and the judgement of the Honble Supreme Court, in General Manager, Telecom Vs, M. Krishnan and Another, reported in CTJ (2009) 1062. 2. The allegation in general made by the complainants are that they have subscribed for mobile phone/cellular phone with various service providers like BSNL, Bharati AIRTEL Ltd., relating to the deficiency in service and unfair trade practice in providing bills relating to excess billing, wrong calculation, delay in providing serv...

The Superintendent of Police Central Range Office of the Directorate o ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2013(1)CWC81; 2013WLR199

(Prayer: Petition under Article 226 of The Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the order dated 28.11.2011 made in Case No.18361/Enquiry/A/2011 dated 28.11.2011 passed by the 2nd respondent and quash the same.) The first respondent is an Advocate practicing at Dindigul. He made an application dated 24.3.2011 under the Right to Information Act (for short "the RTI Act") to the Public Information Officer to furnish him a copy of the Vigilance Manual of the Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption. The Superintendent of Police, Central Range, Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Unit, Chennai, the Public Information Officer passed the order dated 8.4.2011 rejecting the request of the first respondent on the ground that the Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption (for short, "the DVAC") has been exempted from furnishing information under the RTI Act as per G.O.Ms.No.158, Personnel and Administrative Reforms Department da...

C. Rajamani Vs. the State Commissioner for Disabled Rehabilitation Gov ...

Court: Chennai

(Prayer Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records in the impugned proceedings in O.Mu.542/2011 (A6), dated 13.12.2011 and Na.Ka.7878/2012 (A6), dated 10.7.2012 passed by the 5th respondent and quash the same, consequently direct the respondents to grant the disabled persons' pension (or) handicapped pension to the petitioner i.e. C.Rajamani S/o.Late Chinna Muthu.) 1.The prayer in the writ petition is to quash the orders dated 13.12.2011 and 10.7.2012 passed by the fifth respondent and direct the respondents to grant disabled persons' pension (or) handicapped pension to the petitioner i.e. C.Rajamani S/o.Late Chinna Muthu. 2. This writ petition is filed on behalf of the petitioner by his brother C.Saravanan contending that the petitioner is mentally affected to the extent of 65% and aged 46 years and he is residing along with his mother. Respondents 1 and 3 had issued D...

The Management of Annamalai University Madras Vs. M. Venkatachalam and ...

Court: Chennai

(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 30 of Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, against the Judgment and decree, dated 25.05.1998, made in W.C.No.101 of 1996, on the file of the Deputy Commissioner of Labour/Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation, Chennai.) 1. Being aggrieved by the Award, dated 25.05.1998, made in W.C.No.101 of 1996, on the file of the Deputy Commissioner of Labour/Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation, Chennai, the present appeal has been filed. 2. According to the respondent/claimant, he was employed as a Security Guard in M/s.Guardwell Security Allied Service, from 1991 onwards. The Management of the 2nd respondent has deputed him to various places and from March' 1993 onwards, he had worked as Security Guard in Annamalai University, Directorate of Distance Education, Madras Study Centre. While he was functioning as Security Guard, on 06.11.1994, at 7.30 A.M., he met with an accident and sustained a fracture in his leg. Immediatel...

M/S.Tower Vision India Private Limited, Represented by Its Circle Head ...

Court: Chennai

(Writ Petition No.29723 of 2012 is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records comprised in impugned notice in TIN 33341503162/2008-09 dated 10.09.2012 on the file of the respondent and quash the same. Writ Petition No.29724 of 2012 is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records comprised in impugned notice in TIN 33341503162/2009-10 dated 10.09.2012 on the file of the respondent and quash the same. Writ Petition No.29725 of 2012 is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records comprised in impugned notice in TIN 33341503162/2010-11 dated 10.09.2012 on the file of the respondent and quash the same. Writ Petition No.29726 of 2012 is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records comprised in impugned notice in CST.870835/200...