Chennai Court November 2012 Judgments

G. Kumar Vs. the Zonal Manager, Punjab National Bank, Chennai and Anot ...

Court: Chennai

(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of mandamus as stated therein.) 1. The petitioner seeks for issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to issue educational loan application and to grant educational loan to the petitioner's son, namely, K.Siva without any delay. 2. The petitioner's son, K.Siva, passed +2 examination in March, 2011. He joined B.E. Mechanical Engineering in the Vels University, Chennai, during the year 2011-2012. He approached the second respondent Bank for educational loan. The second respondent Bank assured to issue loan application. After some time, in the month of May, 2011, he was informed that the application was not available and he was asked to come back in June, 2011. In these circumstances, the petitioner was forced to pay the first semester fee. 3. Again, in June, 2011, the petitioner approached the second respondent to issue loan application. The second respondent informed him ...

S. Karthik and Others Vs. the Secretary to the Govt of India Ministry ...

Court: Chennai

(Prayer: Prayer in W.P.No.3404 of 2012: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of respondents 2 to 4 relating to the final mark sheet dated 03.11.2011 and 04.11.2011 for candidates for Domestic LPG Distributorship for the Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. for Coimbatore (Race Course/Sungam) issued by the 4th respondent, quash the same and direct respondents 2 to 4 to conduct a fresh-interview based on the advertisement dated 15.06.2010 Published in Dinakaran with a specified time and award dealership to the most eligible person as per the guidelines. Prayer in W.P.No.10261 of 2012: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the 5th respondent pertaining to the circular Director (Marketing) LPG.CON date 14.03.2012 quash the same and direct respondents 2 to 5 to select a Domestic LPG Distribuotr for Bharath Petroleum ...

D. Suresh @ Suresh Kumar Vs. the State Rep. by the Inspector of Police

Court: Chennai

(Prayer: Criminal Revision Petition filed under Section 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C. against the Judgment dated 18.01.2007 made in Crl.Appeal No. 436 of 2006 on the file of the leaned District and Sessions Judge, Coimbatore confirming the judgment dated 28.07.2006 made in C.C. No. 243 of 2005 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VII, Coimbatore.) ORDER 1. The petitioner stood charged and convicted by the learned Judicial Magistrate No.VII, Coimbatore.in C.C. No. 436 of 2006 for the offence punishable under Section 304-A of IPC and Section 181 of Motor Vehicles Act and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for three months with fine of Rs.2,000/-, in default to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of two weeks for the offence under Section 304-A of IPC and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of two weeks with fine of Rs.500/-, in default to undergo simple imprisonment of one week for the offence under Section 181 of Motor Vehicles Act. Aggrieved over the ...

Samydurai Vs. State by the Station House Officer, Kallakurichi Police ...

Court: Chennai

(Prayer: Criminal Revision filed under sections 397 r/w 401 of Criminal Procedure Code to set aside the judgment rendered by the Principal Sessions Court, Villupuram, in Crl.A.No.31 of 2009 dated 21.12.2009, confirming the judgment rendered by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Kallakurichi, in C.C.No.119 of 2007 dated 11.09.2009.) 1. This criminal revision has been filed challenging the judgment passed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Villupuram, in Crl.A.No.31 of 2009 dated 21.12.2009, confirming the judgment rendered by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Kallakurichi, in C.C.No.119 of 2007 dated 11.09.2009. 2. The grievance of the revision petitioner is that the Courts below have failed to take into consideration the Rough Sketch, Ex.P8, produced by the prosecution as well as the deposition of PW-2 in his cross-examination who was projected as an eye witness, who clearly admitted that he came to the spot only ten minutes of the occurrence. It was also admitted that PWs.1 and 2 c...

Vortex Engineering Pvt Ltd Vs. Ncr Financial Solutions Group Ltd

Court: Chennai

ORDER: 1. O.A.No.397 of 2012 has been filed by the applicant / plaintiff under Order XIV Rule 8 of O.S.Rules r/w Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, for grant of interim injunction, restraining the respondent, their men, agents, servants or persons acting on their behalf from in any manner continuing to issue threats to the applicant for infringing the respondent’s alleged copyrights of its NDC documentation that the respondent is contemplating legal action against the applicant, pending disposal of the suit. 2. O.A.No.398 of 2012 has been filed by the applicant / plaintiff under Order XIV Rule 8 of O.S.Rules r/w Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, for grant of interim injunction, restraining the respondent, their men, agents, servants or persons acting on their behalf from in any manner interfering with the legitimate right of the applicant to manufacture and sell its Automated Teller Machines using its own interoperability protocol develo...

Tvs Matriculation Higher Secondary School Vs. State of Tamil Nadu, the ...

Court: Chennai

(Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the 3rd respondent relating to the impugned order dated 19.09.2011 passed by the 3rd respondent and the fee determined in respect of the petitioner school and quash the same and consequentially forbear the respondents from taking any steps towards enforcing or imposing or otherwise issuing directions to the petitioner school in the matter of collection of fees from its students.) R. BANUMATHI, J. The Writ Petitioner an unaided Matriculation Higher Secondary School has filed this Writ Petition challenging the order dated 19.09.2011 fixing the fee structure by the School Fee Determination Committee on the ground of arbitrariness and that it is not in conformity with Tamil Nadu Schools (Regulation of Collection of Fee) Act, 2009 [Tamil Nadu Act 22 of 2009]. 2. Case of Writ Petitioner School is that the order of the Committee in R.C.No.8/PSFDC/PC/20...

R. Prakash Vs. the Manager, Icici Bank Ltd. Home Loan Department

Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai

(The Appellant as complainant filed a complaint before the District Forum against the opposite party praying for a direction to the opposite party to pay 5,00,,000/- towards mental agony and loss and to award costs. The District Forum dismissed the complaint for default. Against the said order, this appeal is preferred by the complainant praying to set aside the order of the District Forum in CC.75/2011 dated 14.09.2011. This appeal coming before us for hearing finally on 28.11.2012 today. Upon hearing the arguments of the counsel on either side, perusing the documents, lower court records, and the order passed by the District Forum, this Commission made the following order:) A.K. ANNAMALAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER (OPEN COURT) Both sides heard. Appellant being the complainant aggrieved by the order of the District Forum as the complaint was dismissed for default, praying for remanding the matter for fresh disposal. The Respondent / opposite party also heard. On perusal of the order of the Dis...

G. Thavamani Vs. Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation (Salem) Ltd., D ...

Court: Chennai

(This writ petition is preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issue of a writ of certiorari to call for the records pertaining to the order dated 02.08.2012 in Ref.PA3/5239/TNSTC/DPI/12 passed by the respondent and quash the same. ) The petitioner has filed the present writ petition seeking to set aside the order dated 2.8.2012. By the impugned order, the petitioner, who was working as a Conductor in Uthangarai Branch, was transferred and posted to work at Salem Branch. 2. The writ petition when it came up for admission on 10.08.2012, this court found that the petitioner was transferred on three occasions in quick successions. In terms of the judgment of the Supreme Court in B.VaradhaRao Vs. State of Karnataka reported in (1986) 4 SCC 131, such practice should be deprecated. Though transfer was said to be on administrative ground, since transfer has been made in quick successions, there will be stay for one week. Subsequently, the stay was extended fro...

Babu Jeevanatham Vs. Azhaguvel Mudaliar

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2013(1)LW606

(Prayer: Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the Order dated 23.01.2004 and made in O.S.No.126 of 2002, on the file of the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Villupuram.) 1.The memorandum of grounds of civil revision is directed against the Order dated 23.01.2004 and made in O.S.No.126 of 2002, on the file of the learned Principal Subordinate Judge, Villupuram. 2.The respondent herein has filed the suit in O.S.No.126 of 2002 as against the revision petitioner herein for the recovery of a sum of Rs.1,36,000/- with subsequent interest at the rate of 12% per annum. 3.The revision petitioner has contested the suit by filing his written statement. After framing necessary issues, the suit stood posted for trial on 12.01.2004. 4.It is obvious to note here that the above suit has been filed based on a demand promissory note dated 23.12.1998. When the plaintiff was in the box, the demand promissory note dated 23.12.1998 was tendered to be marked as a docum...

S. Singaravelu and Others Vs. the Managing Director Tamil Nadu Slum Cl ...

Court: Chennai

(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents from in any way demolishing the building or evicting the petitioners from their dwelling houses situated at S.No.482, bearing Door No. 3/723 Bharathi Nagar 4th Street, Nookampalayam Village, Perumbakkam Chennai-73; (2) 3/725, Bharathi Nagar 4th Street, Nookampalayam Village, Perumbakkam Chennai-73; (3) 3/716-A, Bharathi Nagar 4th Street, Nookampalayam Village, Perumbakkam Chennai-73 and consequently direct the respondent to provide alternative accommodation.) Introductory : 1. These Writ Petitions are directed primarily against the decision taken by the Government of Tamil Nadu to handover land in S.Nos. 536, 537 & 540 in Perumbakkam Village to an extent of 17.90 hectares, 18.84.0 hectares and 0.81.0 hectares respectively to the Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board [hereinafter referred to as ‘the Slum Clearance Board’] and the consequential entry...