Chennai Orders Court March 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Limited Vs Minor C.Katrin Sona
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
C.M.P.(MD)No.120 of 2026 in C.M.A(MD)No.670 of 2023K.MURALI SHANKAR, J.The Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking an order for substituted service of notice on the second respondent by way of paper publication in one issue of local Tamil daily having circulation in Chennai Town. 2.Heard learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing for the first respondent. Records perused.3. Considering the reasons stated in theaffidavit filed in support of this petition, this petition is allowed and the petitioner is permitted to effect substituted service for the second respondent by paper publication in Tamil Daily viz., Malai Malar, in Chennai Town Edition, indicating the date of hearing as 27.04.2026. The publication shall be effected on or before 18.04.2026.4. Post the matter on 27.04.2026. das 27.03.2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Sangith vs J.Paul Nixon
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction )CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN and M.P.(MD).No.1 of 2009 Sangith ...Appellant / Appellant / DefendantVersusJ.Paul Nixon ... Respondent / Respondent / Plaintiff PRAYER :- Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, to set aside the judgment and decree dated 24.09.2008 passed in A.S.No.164 of 2003 on the file of the learned Additional District Court (Fast Track Court-II), Thoothukudi confirming thejudgment and decree dated 31.07.2003 passed in O.S.No.287 of 2002 onthe file of the learned Principal District Munsif Court, Thoothukudi and allow the appeal. For Appellant : Mr.M.P.Senthil For Respondent : Mr.T.A.EbenezerThe learned counsel appearing for the appellant, on instructions, would submit that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case for the present. In this regard, the learned counsel submitted that he had issued notice to the appellant, which was duly receiv...
Veerabhadran Chettiar (Died) vs Balakrishnan(Died), 2. Seetharaman,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
CMP(MD)No.541 of 2023 in S.A.(MD)No.95 of 2015V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to bring the legal representative of deceased Balakrishnan, the proposed respondents 5 to 7 namely Akilandeeswari, Minor Muthu Saran and Minor Muthu Miruthula represented through their respective mother namely the proposed 5th respondent on record and rank them as Respondents 5 to 7 in S.A.(MD)No. 95 of 2015.2. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this Civil Miscellaneous Petition, the petition is ordered.3. Registry is directed to carryout necessary amendment in the cause title. 27.03.2026 Nsr https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Veerabhadran Chettiar (Died) vs Balakrishnan(Died), 2. Seetharaman,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
CMP(MD)No.540 of 2023 in S.A.(MD)No.95 of 2015V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to set aside the order of abatement caused on the death of the 1st respondent namely Balakrishnan in S.A.(MD)No.95 of 2015.2. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this Civil Miscellaneous Petition, the petition is ordered. 27.03.2026 Nsr https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Veerabhadran Chettiar (Died) vs Balakrishnan(Died), 2. Seetharaman,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
CMP(MD)No.538 of 2023 in S.A.(MD)No.95 of 2015V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking to condone the delay of 106 days in filing the petition to set aside the order of abatement caused on the death of the 1st respondent namely Balakrishnan in S.A.(MD)No.95 of 2015.2. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this Civil Miscellaneous Petition, the delay of 166 days is condoned and the petition is ordered. 27.03.2026 Nsr https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Shyam Vs Mrs. D. Boovarasi
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTCORAM:THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY Shyam ... Petitioner Vs Kanniyakumari District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Court Act, topunish the contemnors/ respondents 2 and 3 for willfully disobeying the orderdated 08.08.2025 passed in W.P.(MD).No.21783 of 2025, on the file of this Court in accordance with law. For Petitioner : P.M.Vishnu Varthanan For Respondents : Mr.D.S.Nedunchezhian Government AdvocateORDERThis Court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's application in the light of the decision of the Honourable Supreme Court in the case of Esjaypee Inspects Private Limited Vs. AGM and AO, Canara Bank, reported in 2021(2) CTC 493. Now, the respondent has passed an order dated 30.01.2026 rejecting the claim of the petitioner.2. Hence, this Court is of the considered opinion that there is no contempt as alleged. Accordingly, this Contempt Petition is closed. The peti...
P.Sethuraman Vs B.K.Arvind IPS
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 27.03.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI CONT P(MD)No.323 of 2026 P.Sethuraman ... Petitioner Vs.(R3 is impleaded vide orderdated 27.03.2026 in Sub Application (MD)No.92 of 2026) ... Respondents Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the Contemnors/Respondents for the deliberate and willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD)No. 13585 of 2025 dated 16.07.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Rajaram For R1 and R2 : Mr.A.S.Abul Kalaam Azad, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) For R3 : Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh, Additional Government PleaderORDERThis Contempt Petition has been filed complaining that the orderof this Court dated 16.07.2025 passed in W.P.(MD)No.13585 of 2025 has not been complied with.2. Today, when this contempt petition is taken up for hearing, thelearned Additional Government Pleader submits that as per the direction of this Court, survey has been c...
B.Robin (Died) Baby Leela Bai Vs E.Natarajan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURTCORAM:THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY B.Robin (Died) Baby Leela Bai ... Petitioner Vs Kanniyakumari District. ... Respondents PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Court Act, to punish the contemnors / Respondents herein for the willful disobedience and non compliance of the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD).No.17269 of 2015 dated 27.10.2022. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Vamanan For Respondents : Mr.A.JebarajORDERToday, when the matter came up for hearing, it is represented by the learned counsel on either side that the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD).No.17269 of 2015 dated 27.10.2022, has already been complied with by the respondents.2. Recording the same, this Contempt Petition is closed. 27.03.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes jbr To Kanniyakumari District.S.SRIMATHY, J.jbrORDER MADE INCont P.(MD)No.169 of 2026...
Jackson Viswas Pandian Vs Ranjitha Nesapriya
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
CMP(MD) NO. 2137 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27-03-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.K. RAMAKRISHNAN CMP(MD) No.2137 of 2026 IN CMA(MD) SR No.95584 of 2024 Jackson Viswas Pandian Petitioner(s) Vs Ranjitha Nesapriya Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr.C.Karthik Prayer: To dispense with the production of the certified copy of the decree passed in I.D.O.P.No. 130 of 2022 before the Learned Family Court, Tirunelveli District.ORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble N.Anand Venkatesh J.) This petition has been filed to dispense with the production of the certified copy of the decree passed in I.D.O.P.No.130 of 2022 before the Family Court, Tirunelveli District.2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he has obtained the certified copy of the decree.3. In view of the same, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed. It is left open to the learned counsel for the petitioner to fi...
Jegan Vs The Union of India
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Mar-27-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 27.03.2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL Jegan ...Petitioner/Accused Vs The Union of India Through its Jr. Intelligence Officer Narcotic Control Bureau, Chennai Zonal Unit Chennai (NCB F.No.48/1/12/2023-NCB/MDS ) ...Respondent For Petitioners : Mr.R.Venkatesan For Respondent : Mr.C.Arul Vadivel @ Sekar Special Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Bail in NCB F.No.48/1/12/2023-NCB/MDS on the file of the respondent police.ORDER : The Court made the following order :-The petitioner/A4, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 18.08.2023 for the offences punishable under Sections 8(c) r/w.20(b)(ii) (c), 27A, 28 and 29(1) of NDPS Act in NCB F.No.48/1/12/2023-NCB/MDS on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused were found in illegal possession of 423kgs of ganja. Hence,...
- ‹ Prev
- 49
- 50
- 51
- 52
- 53
- 55
- 56
- 57
- 58
- 59
- Next ›
- Last »