Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

P.Sethuraman Vs B.K.Arvind IPS

P.Sethuraman vs B.K.Arvind IPS

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Mar 27, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1542667

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CONT P(MD)/323/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

P.Sethuraman

Respondent

B.K.Arvind IPS

Excerpt

before the madurai bench of madras high court dated : 27.03.2026coramthe honourable mr. justice b.pugalendhi cont p(md)no.323 of 2026 p.sethuraman ... petitioner vs.(r3 is impleaded vide orderdated 27.03.2026 in sub application (md)no.92 of 2026) ... respondents contempt petition filed under section 11 of the contempt of courts act, 1971, to punish the contemnors/respondents for the deliberate and willful disobedience of the order passed by this court in w.p.(md)no. 13585 of 2025 dated 16.07.2025. for petitioner : mr.a.rajaram for r1 and r2 : mr.a.s.abul kalaam azad, government advocate (crl. side) for r3 : mr.g.v.vairam santhosh, additional government pleaderorderthis contempt petition has been filed complaining that the orderof this court dated 16.07.2025 passed in w.p.(md)no.13585 of 2025 has not been complied with.2. today, when this contempt petition is taken up for hearing, thelearned additional government pleader submits that as per the direction of this court, survey has been conducted and the order of this court dated 16.07.2025 passed in w.p.(md)no.13585 of 2025 has been complied with. he has also furnished a copy of the survey report to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.3. recording the said submission, this contempt petition is closed. ogy index : yes / no. internet: yes / no. ncc : yes / no. tob.pugalendhi, j.ogy cont p(md) no.323 of 2026

Full Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 27.03.2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI CONT P(MD)No.323 of 2026 P.Sethuraman ... Petitioner Vs.

(R3 is impleaded vide order

dated 27.03.2026 in Sub Application (MD)No.92 of 2026) ... Respondents Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the Contemnors/Respondents for the deliberate and willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD)No. 13585 of 2025 dated 16.07.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Rajaram For R1 and R2 : Mr.A.S.Abul Kalaam Azad, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) For R3 : Mr.G.V.Vairam Santhosh, Additional Government Pleader

ORDER

This Contempt Petition has been filed complaining that the order

of this Court dated 16.07.2025 passed in W.P.(MD)No.13585 of 2025 has not been complied with.

2. Today, when this contempt petition is taken up for hearing, the

learned Additional Government Pleader submits that as per the direction of this Court, survey has been conducted and the order of this Court dated 16.07.2025 passed in W.P.(MD)No.13585 of 2025 has been complied with. He has also furnished a copy of the survey report to the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.

3. Recording the said submission, this Contempt Petition is closed. ogy Index : Yes / No. Internet: Yes / No. NCC : Yes / No. To

B.PUGALENDHI, J.

ogy CONT P(MD) No.323 of 2026

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial