Jegan Vs The Union of India

Jegan vs The Union of India

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Mar 27, 2026

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1550146

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1550146
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr. Justice P.Dhanabal
Decided On: Mar 27, 2026
Case Number: CRL OP(MD)/3713/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jegan

Respondent

The Union of India

Excerpt

.....:- for bail in ncb f.no.48/1/12/2023-ncb/mds on the file of the respondent police.order : the court made the following order :-the petitioner/a4, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 18.08.2023 for the offences punishable under sections 8(c) r/w.20(b)(ii) (c), 27a, 28 and 29(1) of ndps act in ncb f.no.48/1/12/2023-ncb/mds on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.2. the case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused were found in illegal possession of 423kgs of ganja. hence, the case..3. the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondentpolice has registered a false case against the petitioner and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. he would further submit that as per the confession statement of the petitioner the petitioner and other accused person were stopped at 16.08.2023 at 9.30am but the arrest memo preferred on 17.08.2023 at 9.20 pm., and 9.40 pm., which is more than 24 hours. he would further submit that the petitioner has been arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 18.08.2023. hence, he prays to grant bail to the petitioner.4. the learned additional public prosecutor appearing for therespondent would submit that the petitioner along with other accused were found in illegal possession of 423kgs of ganja. further the earlier bail application filed by the petitioner was dismissed and there is no change in circumstances of the case to consider the bail petition.. hence, he opposed to grant bail to the petitioner.5. this court heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.6. considering the rival submissions on either side and that thecontraband involved in this case is commercial quantity and the earlier bail application filed by the petitioner was dismissed and there is no change in circumstances of the case to consider the present petition and further in this case trial commenced and most of the witnesses have been examined this court is.....

Full Judgment

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 27.03.2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL Jegan ...Petitioner/Accused Vs The Union of India Through its Jr. Intelligence Officer Narcotic Control Bureau, Chennai Zonal Unit Chennai (NCB F.No.48/1/12/2023-NCB/MDS ) ...Respondent For Petitioners : Mr.R.Venkatesan For Respondent : Mr.C.Arul Vadivel @ Sekar Special Public Prosecutor PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.483 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Bail in NCB F.No.48/1/12/2023-NCB/MDS on the file of the respondent police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :-

The petitioner/A4, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 18.08.2023 for the offences punishable under Sections 8(c) r/w.20(b)(ii) (c), 27A, 28 and 29(1) of NDPS Act in NCB F.No.48/1/12/2023-NCB/MDS on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused were found in illegal possession of 423kgs of ganja. Hence, the case..

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent

police has registered a false case against the petitioner and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He would further submit that as per the confession statement of the petitioner the petitioner and other accused person were stopped at 16.08.2023 at 9.30am but the arrest memo preferred on 17.08.2023 at 9.20 pm., and 9.40 pm., which is more than 24 hours. He would further submit that the petitioner has been arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 18.08.2023. Hence, he prays to grant bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the

respondent would submit that the petitioner along with other accused were found in illegal possession of 423kgs of ganja. Further the earlier bail application filed by the petitioner was dismissed and there is no change in circumstances of the case to consider the bail petition.. Hence, he opposed to grant bail to the petitioner.

5. This Court heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

6. Considering the rival submissions on either side and that the

contraband involved in this case is commercial quantity and the earlier bail application filed by the petitioner was dismissed and there is no change in circumstances of the case to consider the present petition and further in this case trial commenced and most of the witnesses have been examined this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Hence the petition stands dismissed.

(P D B J) 27.03.2026 aav To 1.The Jr. Intelligence Officer Narcotic Control Bureau, Chennai Zonal Unit Chennai 2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. P. DHANABAL, J aav

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No. 3713 of 2026 Date : 27.03.2026

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties Jegan vs The Union of India Same Judge Honourable Mr. Justice P.Dhanabal