Chennai Orders Court February 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Naga Jewel Palace (Gstin 33AGQPR9009Q1ZH) vs Assistant Commissioner(St ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN and WMP Nos.8274 & 8277 of 2026 Naga Jewel Palace (GSTIN:33AGQPR9009Q1ZH) Rep by its Proprietor N Rajesh Khanna 46, Main Bazaar, Vellore- 632 004. ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. Assistant Commissioner(ST) VELLORE RURAL ASSESSMENT CIRCLE, No.4, Fort Round Road/ Bharathiyar Salai, Vellore- 632 001.2. Assistant Commissioner Of CGST & Central Excise VELLORE DIVISION VELLORE RANGE Central Revenue Building, Barrack Maidan, Officers Line, Vellore 632 001 ..Respondent(s)Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the entire records on the file of the 1st Respondent in connection with impugned order dated 10.12.2025 Vide Ref No. ARN/ RFN/ Case ID AD330725069120C passed by the 1st Respondent and quash the same. For Petitioner(s): M/s.P C Harikumar And Associates For R1: Mrs.K.Vasanthamala Government Advocate. Page1 of 5 For...
ANTONY SALETH JEEVA.D @ ANTONY Vs State represented by The Inspector o ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Antony Saleth Jeeva.D @ Antony ..Petitioner(s) Vs State represented by The Inspector of Police, ..Respondent(s) To relax the conditions imposed in Para No. 6(b) on the petitioner in the order dt. 26.12.2025 passed in Crl.OP No.35540 of 2025 on the file of this Honble Court. For Petitioner(s): Mr.P.Britto For Respondent(s): Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThis petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed upon the petitioner in Crl.OP No. 35540 of 2025 dated 26.12.2025, passed by this Court to report before the concerned POCSO Court on all working days at 10.30 am, until further orders.2. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the petitioner has been regularly complying with the conditions imposed by this Court and the investigation is still pending. Page1 of 2 K.RAJASEKAR J. gbi3. Considering the said submission, the condition imposed by this ...
SENTHIL Vs The District collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27.02.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN Senthil S/o.Dakshinamurthy, Venkadathampatty Village and Post, Uthangarai Taluk, Krishnagiri District. Petitioner Vs 4.Bakthavatsalam President, Ariya Vysia Sangam, Bazzar Street, Uthangarai. RespondentsPRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents 1 to 3 to cancel the patta No.103 issued infavour of the 4th respondent in respect of the land in Survey Nos.89/2 measuring 0.26.00 Hectares and Survey No.89/3 measuring 0.14.00 Hectares of Venkadathampatty Village, Uthagarai Taluk, Krishnagiri District by considering petitioners representation dated 16.12.2025.For Petitioner: Ms.L.Aishwaryalakshmi For Respondents: Mr.M.Habeeb Rahman Government Advocate for R1 to R3ORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Hea...
Muniammal Vs STATE REP.BY, the inspector of police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Muniammal ..Petitioner(s) Vs STATE REP.BY, the inspector of police Cr.No.336 of 2025. ..Respondent(s)To amend the provisions of law under Section 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 351(3) of BNS Act read with 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Women Harassment Act instead of under Section 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 353(1) of BNS Act read with 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Women Harassment Act in connection with crime no.336 of 2025 in Crl OP.No.1373 of 2026 in order dated For Petitioner(s): M/s.K.Nagarajan For Respondent(s): Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThis petition has been filed seeking to amend the order in Crl.O.P.No. 1373 of 2026 dated 29/01/2026 by including the offence under Sections as 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 351(3) of BNS Act read with 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Women Harassment Act instead of under Section 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 353(1) of BNS Act read with 4 of Tam...
M.Kandasamy Vs Sellam
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
C.M.P.No.5834 of 2026 in C.M.A.SR.No.157519 of 2025K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J.This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking to condone the delay of 97 days in representing the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.3. Having been satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, delay is condoned and this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is allowed. 27.02.2026 mrr Note: Registry is directed to number C.M.A.SR.No.157519 of 2025, if it is otherwise in order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Shanthi Vs State by, Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.02.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR in 1.Shanthi2. Sathya Surya3. Sandeep MR ..... Petitioner/Accused Vs. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by The Inspector of Police, Coimbatore . ... Respondent (Crime No.702 of 2025) For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondent : M/s.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side) **********ORDERThis petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.457 of 2026 on 19.01.2026. Page No.1 of 2K.RAJASEKAR, J.Sma2. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) submitted that, the petitioner is complying with the condition regularly imposed by this Court.3. Considering the said submission and reasons stated in the affidavit,the condition imposed on the petitioner is relaxed. However, it is made clear that, the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. 27.02.2026 Index : Yes/NoSpeaking Order/Non Speaking OrderSma...
R.Balakrishnan vs the Joint Commissioner
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY IN W.P.No. 7501 of 2026 1.R.Balakrishnan S/o.Late Ramasamy, Residing at2. V.Shanmugam S/o.Late Velappan, Residing at Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Joint Commissioner District. Respondent(s) For Petitioners Mr.N.Manoharan For Respondents: Mr.N.R.R.Arun Natarajan, Spl.G.P.(HR & CE) for R1ORDEROrdered ari To 1.The Joint CommissionerD.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J.ari W.M.P.No. 8082 of 2026 IN W.P.No.7501 of 2026...
Selvakumar Vs The Deputy Chief Labour Commissioner (Central)
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SHAMIM AHMED Selvakumar ..Petitioner Vs1. The Deputy Chief Labour Commissioner (Central), Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act 1972, and Controlling Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act 1972,3. The Chief General Manager, Circle Office No.524, Anna Salai, Teyampet,4. The Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer, Canara Bank, Head Office, No. 112, J C Road Bangalore 560 002 ..Respondents Page1 of 4Prayer : Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for all the records relating to the order dated 21.12.2021 made in Appeal No.93/2020 on the file of the 1st respondent rejecting the Appeal of the petitioner and quash the same and consequently direct the 3rd and 4th Respondents to pay the gratuity payable to the petitioner along with simple interest at 12.00 percentage p.a. from 07.09.2010 to til...
Sadaiyan Vs The State Rep. by the Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN in Sadaiyan S/o.Chinnaiyan, No.41/2, East street, Malaiyarasampattu village, Nocimedu post, Kalvarayanmalai taluk, Kallakurichi District. Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep. by the Inspector of Police, NIB-CID, Villupuram. Respondent(s) PRAYER Criminal Miscellaneous Petition under Section 528 of BNSS to modify the condition imposed in para No.4 (c) on the petitioner by order dated 17.11.2025 in Crl.M.P.No.19107 of 2025 in Crl.A.No.1017 of 2025 . For Petitioner(s): Mr.L.RAJENDRAN For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Balaji Government Advocate (criminal Side)ORDERThis Court, while suspending the sentence imposed on the petitioner by order dated 17.11.2025 in Crl.M.P. No. 19107 of 2025 in Crl.A. No. 1017 of 2025 had imposed the condition at Paragraph No.4 (c) of the saidorder that the petitioner shall report before the Karialur Police Station,Kalvarayan Hills on every alternative day at 10.30.a.m. and als...
M.KARTHIK Vs The State Rep. by the Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-27-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR M.Karthik ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep. by the Inspector of Police, ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This petition is filed under section 528 of BNSS, seeking to amend the Satisfaction Court Judicial Magistrate, Sholinghur instead of Judicial Magistrate, No-II, Sholinghur in Crl.O.P.No.34282 of 2025 order dated 19.12.2025. For Petitioner(s): Mr.A.S.Aswin Prasanna For Respondent(s): Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.side)ORDERThis petition has been filed seeking to amend the satisfaction Court as Judicial Magistrate, Sholinghur instead of Judicial Magistrate, No-II, Sholinghur in Crl.OP.No. 34282 of 2025 dated 19.12.2025. Page1 of 2K.RAJASEKAR, J.GBI2. In view of the averments adduced in the affidavit filed in support of the petitions, this petition is ordered as prayed for. The Registry is directed tocarry out the necessary amendment in Crl.O.P.No.34282 of 2025 orderdated 19.12.2025 ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »