Selvakumar Vs The Deputy Chief Labour Commissioner (Central)

Selvakumar vs The Deputy Chief Labour Commissioner (Central)

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Feb 27, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1423704

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1423704
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice Shamim Ahmed
Decided On: Feb 27, 2026
Case Number: WP/5210/2022

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Selvakumar

Respondent

The Deputy Chief Labour Commissioner (Central)

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 27-02-2026coramthe hon'ble mr.justice shamim ahmed selvakumar ..petitioner vs1. the deputy chief labour commissioner (central), appellate authority under the payment of gratuity act 1972, and controlling authority under the payment of gratuity act 1972,3. the chief general manager, circle office no.524, anna salai, teyampet,4. the managing director and chief executive officer, canara bank, head office, no. 112, j c road bangalore 560 002 ..respondents page1 of 4prayer : writ petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india, praying for a writ of certiorarified mandamus, calling for all the records relating to the order dated 21.12.2021 made in appeal no.93/2020 on the file of the 1st respondent rejecting the appeal of the petitioner and quash the same and consequently direct the 3rd and 4th respondents to pay the gratuity payable to the petitioner along with simple interest at 12.00 percentage p.a. from 07.09.2010 to till date of actual payment for petitioner : no appearancefor respondents : no appearanceorderwhen the matter is taken up for consideration in the revised call, no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner. even the learned counsel for the respondents is also not present. the matter is of the year 2022. it appears that the petitioner as well as his counsel has no interest to pursue the matter any further. accordingly, the case is dismissed for want of prosecution. interim order, if any, shall stand vacated. there is no order as to costs. neutral citation: yes/no mrn page2 of 4 to1. the deputy chief labour commissioner (central) appellate authority under the payment of gratuity act 1972, and controlling authority under the payment of gratuity act 1972,3. the chief general manager circle office no. 524, anna salai, teyampet,4. the managing director and chief executive officer head office, no. 112, j c road bangalore 560 002 page3 of 4shamim ahmed, j.mrn page4 of 4

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 27-02-2026
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SHAMIM AHMED Selvakumar ..Petitioner Vs
1. The Deputy Chief Labour Commissioner (Central), Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act 1972, and Controlling Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act 1972,
3. The Chief General Manager, Circle Office No.524, Anna Salai, Teyampet,
4. The Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer, Canara Bank, Head Office, No. 112, J C Road Bangalore 560 002 ..Respondents Page1 of 4
Prayer : Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for all the records relating to the order dated 21.12.2021 made in Appeal No.93/2020 on the file of the 1st respondent rejecting the Appeal of the petitioner and quash the same and consequently direct the 3rd and 4th Respondents to pay the gratuity payable to the petitioner along with simple interest at 12.00 percentage p.a. from 07.09.2010 to till date of actual payment For Petitioner : No appearance
For Respondents : No appearance

ORDER

When the matter is taken up for consideration in the revised call, no one appeared on behalf of the Petitioner. Even the learned counsel for the Respondents is also not present. The matter is of the year 2022. It appears that the Petitioner as well as his Counsel has no interest to pursue the matter any further. Accordingly, the case is dismissed for want of Prosecution. Interim order, if any, shall stand vacated. There is no order as to costs. Neutral Citation: Yes/No MRN Page2 of 4 To

1. The Deputy Chief Labour Commissioner (Central) Appellate Authority under the payment of Gratuity Act 1972, and Controlling Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act 1972,

3. The Chief General Manager Circle office No. 524, Anna Salai, Teyampet,

4. The Managing Director and Chief Executive officer Head office, No. 112, J C Road Bangalore 560 002 Page3 of 4

SHAMIM AHMED, J.

MRN Page4 of 4

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2026 Same Parties Selvakumar vs The Deputy Chief Labour Commissioner (Central) Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice Shamim Ahmed