Chennai Orders Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Murugan vs the District Collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.01.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN Murugan .. Petitioner Vs. Villupuram District. Villupuram District. .. RespondentsPrayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to consider the joint Objection dated 07.01.2026 given by the Villagers of Eraiyur, before granting approval to the land in Survey No.62/2 measuring an extent of 2.38.0 hectares in Eraiyur Village classified as Kallanguthu Poramboke, for assignment of patta to the poor people and to change the place to the nearby alternate Natham poromboke land comprised in Survey No 240 or any other land, within the Eraiyur village.For Petitioner : Mr.A.E.Ravichandran For Respondents : Mr.E.Vijay Anand Additional Government PleaderORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) This petition is filed seeking...
E.R.Squibb and Sons LLC vs Union of India
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN CMP No.2094 of 2026 in WA SR No.8929 of 20261. E.R.Squibb and Sons LLC At Route 206 and Province Line Road, Princeton, New Jersey 08540, Rep.by its Constituted Attorney Sanjay Sharma2. Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd At 1-5, Doshomachi 2-Chome, Chuo-ku, Osaka-shi, Osaka 541-8526 Japan Rep.by its Constituted Attorney Pankaj Pahuja Applicant(s) Vs1. Union of India Through the Ministry of Commerce, Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion Udyog Bhawan, New Delhi - 110011.2. The Controller of Patents and Designs The Patent Office, Intellectual Property Office Building, GST Road, Guindy, Chennai 600 032.3. Zydus Healthcare Ltd, Of Zydus Corporate Park, Scheme No.63, Survey No.536 Khoraj (Gandhinagar), Vaishnodevi Circle Ahmedabad, Gujarat - 382481 Respondent(s) For Applicant(s): Mr. K.Premchandar For Respondent(s):Mr. Adars...
E.R.Squibb and Sons LLC vs Union of India
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN CMP No.2092 of 2026 in WA SR No.8929 of 20261. E.R.Squibb and Sons LLC At Route 206 and Province Line Road, Princeton, New Jersey 08540, Rep.by its Constituted Attorney Sanjay Sharma2. Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd At 1-5, Doshomachi 2-Chome, Chuo-ku, Osaka-shi, Osaka 541-8526 Japan Rep.by its Constituted Attorney Pankaj Pahuja Applicant(s) Vs1. Union of India Through the Ministry of Commerce, Department of Industrial Policy and Promotion Udyog Bhawan, New Delhi - 110011.2. The Controller of Patents and Designs The Patent Office, Intellectual Property Office Building, GST Road, Guindy, Chennai 600 032.3. Zydus Healthcare Ltd, Of Zydus Corporate Park, Scheme No.63, Survey No.536 Khoraj (Gandhinagar), Vaishnodevi Circle Ahmedabad, Gujarat - 382481 Respondent(s) For Applicant(s): Mr. K.Premchandar For Respondent(s):Mr. Adars...
M.ESAKKIMUTHU Vs State represented by,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR M. Esakkimuthu ... Petitioner/ Accused Vs. The State Rep. By, The Inspector of Police, (Crime No.767 of 2010) ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail pending trial in S.C.No.51 of 2018 on the file of the learned Principal Assistant Sessions Court, Kancheepuram District. For Petitioner : Mr. B. Gopalakrishnan For Respondent : Mr. A. Gopinath Government Advocate (Criminal Side) ******ORDERThe petitioner was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 30.09.2025 based on execution of Non-Bailable Warrant issued by the learned Principal Assistant Sessions Court, Kancheepuram for the offence punishable under Sections 394, 397 and 511 of IPC pending trial in S.C.No.51 of 2018, seeks bail. The earlier bail application of the petitioner was dismissed by this Court, vide order dat...
R.CHANDRASEKAR Vs State rep.by, The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
Crl.M.P.No.1431 of 2026 in Crl.RC.SR.No.102837 of 2025SUNDER MOHAN, J.This petition is filed to condone the delay of 14 days in filing the above Criminal Revision.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.R.Vinothraja, learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondent.3. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the delay stands condoned and the petition is ordered. 30.01.2026 Tsg Note: Registry is directed to number this Criminal Revision, if it is otherwise in order. 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Mujeeburahman Vs The State Rep. by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 30.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR in Mujeeburahman ... Petitioner Vs. State Rep.by Inspector of Police, Pollachi. ... Respondent PRAYER : To relax the condition imposed in Paragraph No.7b in Crl.OP.No.899 of 2025 by order dated 12.01.2026. For Petitioner : Mr.Sheela Raju For Respondent : Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThis petition has been filed to relax the condition imposed upon the petitioner in Crl.O.P.No.899 of 2025 dated 12.01.2026, passed by this Court to report before the respondent police daily at 10.30a.m, for a period of three weeks and thereafter as and when required for interrogation.2. Being not satisfied with the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, I am not inclined to allow this petition.4. Accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition stands dismissed. Vv To1. The Inspector of Police, Pollachi.2. The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras, Chennai 600 104.K.RAJASEKAR, ...
N.SIVAKUMAR Vs The Commissioner of prohibition and Excise,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30.01.2026CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN & W.M.P.No.2652 of 2026 N.Sivakumar S./o Natrajan Chengapalli Post Tiruppur District 638 812 Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise Ezhilagam Chennai 600 005.2. The District Collector Tiruppur.3. The Managing Director Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd (TASMAC) 4th Floor, CMDA Tower, Egmore Chennai.4. The Superintendent of Police Tiruppur.5. The Senior Regional Manager 305A, Vilankurichi Road Peelammedu Coimbatore.6. The District Manager Angeripalayam Road Tirupur 641 602.7. The Assistant Commissioner of Excise District Collectorate Tiruppur8. The Tahsildar Uthukuli Taluk Uthukuli.9. The Deputy superintendent of police Avinashi Tiruppur District. 10.The Inspector of Police Kunnathur Police Station Kunnathur Tiruppur District. Respondent(s)Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of ...
V.RADHAKRISHNAN Vs The Superintendent of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 30-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA V.Radhakrishnan ..Petitioner Vs3. Vijayakumar..Respondents Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita to direct the 1st respondent police not to harass the Petitioner in any manner whatsoever except by following due process of law, in connection with the complaint of the 2nd respondent in C.No.252/SP(G) DCB/PLR/2024 dated 26.09.2025. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Jawahar For Respondent : Mr.S.Santhosh Government Advocate (Criminal Side) For R1 and R2 Page1 of 4ORDERThe present Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking a direction to the second respondent police not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry.2. The case of the petitioner is that under the pretext of conducting an enquiry in connection with the existing civil dispute with the third respondent, the second respondent Police are unnecessarily h...
M/s.VELAYUTHAM AND CO Vs the State Transport Authority
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 25-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN WP No. 3069 of 2026 M/s.VELAYUTHAM AND CO Rep. by its Partner V.Gopalakrishnan 7 Calve Bungalow, Puducherry .. Petitioner Vs The State Transport Authority Puducherry .. Respondent For Petitioner : Mr.K.Hariharan For Respondent : Mrs.V.Usha for Mr.P.Tamilvanan, Additional Government Pleader (Pondy)ORDERIn terms of the order passed by this court on 30.01.2026, the respondent was directed to pass appropriate orders under Section 82 of the Motor Vehicles Act and report compliance to this Court.2. The respondent was not in a position to pass an order on account of objection that had been made by one, Gnanasekaran. Yesterday, i.e. on 24.02.2026, the writ petition in W.P.No.6385 of2026, filed by the said Gnanasekaran was dismissed by this Court, removing the impediment that the respondent was suffering to pass orders, as per the order dated 30.01.2026.3. Mrs.V.Usha had stated on 24.0...
RAYAPPAN Vs State rep.by, The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
Crl.M.P.No.1190 of 2026 in Crl.A.SR.No.103101 of 2025SUNDER MOHAN, J.This petition is filed to condone the delay of 288 days in filing the above Criminal Appeal2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.S.Raja Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent.3. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the delay stands condoned and the petition is ordered. 30.01.2026 Tsg Note: Registry is directed to number this Criminal Appeal, if it is otherwise in order. 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »