Chennai Orders Court January 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
V.C. murugesan Vs The Commissioner
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN W.P No. 539 of 2026 V.C. Murugesan ..Petitioner Vs1. The Commissioner2. The Chairman, ..RespondentsWrit Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to grant Final approval to the Petitioner layout formed in 3.30 1/4 acres bearing old S.F. Nos.102A and 103A, New S.F. Nos. 7/2C and 8/1A, Rangasamuthram Village, now in T.S.No. 24/1, Ward E, Block 1, Sathyamangalam, Erode District, in terms of the Technical Approval in ROC No. N5Z5MTBE/ 2025/TCP, Layout Approval No. 100/ 2025 dated 05.04.2025 granted by the DTCP, Erode by considering the petitioners representation dated 28.11.2025.For Petitioner: Mr.D.Keerthirajan For Respondents: M/s.B.AnandORDERToday, when this matter is taken up for hearing the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner had sought permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition...
N.Palanisamy Vs The Divisional Engineer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-01-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN IN WP NO. 28496 OF 2018 N.Palanisamy S/o.Late Nachimuthu Gounder, No. 2, White Field, Tiruppur Illam Back Side, Avinashi Road, Tiruppur 641 603 ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Divisional Engineer Highways Department, 1371A/ 1, Highways Colony, Gopalapuram, CoimbatoreCoimbatore2. The Commissioner of Police,3. The Commissioner, Corporation of Tiruppur, Kumaran Road,4. G.Vijiya W/o.Govindaraj, 6/8, Thiruneelagandar Street,5. G.Vigneshvaran Page1 of 8 S/o.Govindharaj, 6/8, Thiruneelgandar Street,6. V.Susila W/o.Vadival, 55, Nethaji Street, 15,7. B.Mahalakshmi W/o.Babu, 131, Bavendar Bharathidasan Nagar, Pillayar Koil Street, Gandhi Nagar, Tiruppur-641 603.8. S.Neelammal W/o.Shanmugam, 3/128, Barathi Nagar, Tiruppur-641 602.9. G.Karthikeyan , S/o.Govindharaj, 6/80, Thiruneelagandar10. M.Anitha W/o.Mariyappan, 6/80, Thiruneelagandar11. R.Aithammal...
SATHISH Vs The Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29-01-2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR1. Sathish S/o. Babu, Gopalapuram, Pattabiram, Tiruvallur District. Tamil Nadu-600 072. Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Inspector of Police Respondent(s)PRAYER To enlarge the Petitioner on bail in respect Crime No.585 of 2025 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Arackkonam Police Station, Chennai, Where investigation pending and render Justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.Lokesh for Mrid Law Firm For Respondent(s): Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERThe petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 27.09.2025, for the alleged offences punishable under Section 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 351(3) of BNS Act, 2023 @ 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 351(3) of BNS Act, 2023 r/w. Section 25(1)(a) of Arms Act, 1959, in Crime No.585 of 2025 on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail.2. This is 2nd bail petition. Earlier bail petition of the petitioner was dismissed on...
NATARAJAN Vs The State Rep. by the Sub- Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29.01.2026CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA and Crl.M.P.No.1174 of 20261. Natarajan2. N.Manibharath3. Jeyalakshmi ... Petitioners Vs.1. The State represented by, The Sub-Inspector of Police, Uthukuli Police Station, Tiruppur District. (Crime No.99 of 2025)2. Suresh ... RespondentsPRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita/Section 482 Cr.P.C., to call for the records in C.C.No.58 of 2025, pending on the file of the learned District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Uthukuli and quash the same. For Petitioners : Mr.C.Prabhu For R1 : Mr.S.Santhosh Government Advocate (Criminal Side)ORDERThe present Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.58 of 2025 pending on the file of the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate Court, Uthukuli.2. Based on the complaint given by the second respondent/defacto complainant, alleging that ...
K.Veeraraghavan Vs The Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY K.Veeraraghavan .. Petitioner vs 1.The Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Commercial Tax and Registration Department, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009. 2.The Inspector General of Registration, 100, Santhome High Road, Chennai 600 004. 3.The District Revenue Officer (Stamps), Office of the District Collector, Chennai, Singaravelar Maligai, Rajaji Salai, Chennai 600 001. 4.The Sub Registrar, Office of the Sub Registrar, Thiruporur, Kancheepuram District Pin 603 310. .. Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to callfor the records of the second respondent in his impugned orderNo.Na.Ka.36368/NI/2025 dated 26.11.2025 with all other connected records and quash the same and direct the fourth respondent to accept payment of Rs.3,52,584/- only without interest for deficit stamp du...
D. Dhamodharan Vs The Inspector General of Registration
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY D.Dhamodharan .. Petitioner vs 3.Sathiyaraj 4.Soundarya 5.Sumithra 6.Minor Arjun rep. By Natural Guardian/mother Uma 7.K.Nagarajan .. RespondentsPetition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a writ of mandamus to consider the petitioners representation dated 15.12.2025 submitted before the first respondent for conducting enquiry on fraudulent registration of sale deed Document No.7634/2025 on the file of the first respondent i.e., the Joint I Sub Registrar Office of Saidapet, South Chennai Registration District dated 10.06.2025.For Petitioner : Mr.S.Najimudeen For Respondents : Mr.S.Jayachandran, Government Advocate for R1 and R2ORDERThe petitioner seeks consideration of representation dated 15.12.2025 for conducting an enquiry in relation to the allegedly fraudulent registration of sale deed bearing Document No.7634 of2025. In th...
The Secretary to Government Vs E. Suganthi
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
C.M.P.No.2009 of 2026 in W.A.SR.No..209290 of 2025R.SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDK.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J.This civil miscellaneous petition has been filed to condone the delay of 31 days in filing the above writ appeal.2. Heard Mr.E.Veda Bagath Singh, learned Special Government Pleader for the petitioner State.3. Mr.R.Sampath Kumar takes notice forthe first respondent and he vehemently opposed to condone the delay. Mr.I.Abrar Md.Abdullah takes notice for the 2nd respondent and he has no serious objection in allowing the petition.4. If plausible reasons are stated in theaffidavit filed in support of the petition to condone the delay, that too for a very minimal delay of 31 days, normally the Court would not reject such plea. Here in the present case, it is only a short delay of 31 days, for which reasons have been stated. Even administrative delay would be causing delay in filing the appeal. Therefore, accepting the reasons stated, the delay is condoned and the petition is ordered.5. Registr...
Chandrasekar Vs The State Rep. By, The Sub-Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 29.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR CRL OP NO.1453 of 2026 Chandrasekar S/o.Palani ... Petitioner/ Accused Vs The State Rep. By, The Sub Inspector of Police, (Crime No.382 of 2025) ... Respondent/Complainant PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, pleased to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest by the respondent police concerned in Crime No.382 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police.For Petitioner : Mr. Sriraam M.S. For Respondent : Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ******ORDERThe petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 303(2), 326(a) of BNS Act, 2023, and r/w 21(1) Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, in Crime No.382 of 2025 on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail.2. The earlier criminal o...
P.MAGESH Vs State Rep. by The Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
Crl.MP.No.1216 of 2026 in Crl.OP.SR.No.516 of 2026A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.Dispense with ordered.2. Registry is directed to number the criminal original petition, if it is otherwise in order and list the same for admission in due course. 29.01.2026 skt https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
P.GOWTHAM Vs State rep.by, The Inspector of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jan-29-2026
Crl.M.P.No.657 of 2026 in Crl.RC.SR.No.479 of 2026SUNDER MOHAN, J.This petition is filed to condone the delay of 84 days in filing the Criminal Revision Case.2. Heard the learned counsel for petitioner as well as the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent.3. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the delay stands condoned and the petition is ordered. 29.01.2026 Mac Note: Registry is directed to number the Revision Case, if it is otherwise in order. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...