Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

SATHISH Vs The Inspector of Police

Sathish vs The Inspector of Police

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jan 29, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1413113

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL OP/2009/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sathish

Respondent

The Inspector of Police

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 29-01-2026coramthe honourable mr.justice k.rajasekar1. sathish s/o. babu, gopalapuram, pattabiram, tiruvallur district. tamil nadu-600 072. petitioner(s) vs1. the inspector of police respondent(s)prayer to enlarge the petitioner on bail in respect crime no.585 of 2025 on the file of the inspector of police, arackkonam police station, chennai, where investigation pending and render justice. for petitioner(s): mr.s.lokesh for mrid law firm for respondent(s): mr.a.gopinath government advocate (crl.side)orderthe petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 27.09.2025, for the alleged offences punishable under section 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 351(3) of bns act, 2023 @ 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 351(3) of bns act, 2023 r/w. section 25(1)(a) of arms act, 1959, in crime no.585 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.2. this is 2nd bail petition. earlier bail petition of the petitioner was dismissed on 26.11.2025 in crl.o.p.no.32408 of 2025 on the following reasons:“6. i have also gone through the fir and other connected records which reveals that the petitioner has actively participated in this case and he is having 11 previous cases including two murder cases and four cases under section 379 of bns act, and he is a history sheeter and one case is pocso and other offences, this court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.”3. considering that there is no change in circumstances and i am not inclined to reconsider the earlier order. accordingly, this criminal original petition is dismissed. mpa index:yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderinternet:yes neutral citation:yes/no to 1.the inspector of police 2.the public prosecutor, high court, madras. k.rajasekar j. mpa crl op no. 2009 of

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 29-01-2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR

1. Sathish S/o. Babu, Gopalapuram, Pattabiram, Tiruvallur District. Tamil Nadu-600 072. Petitioner(s) Vs

1. The Inspector of Police Respondent(s)

PRAYER To enlarge the Petitioner on bail in respect Crime No.585 of 2025 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Arackkonam Police Station, Chennai, Where investigation pending and render Justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.Lokesh for Mrid Law Firm For Respondent(s): Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

ORDER

The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 27.09.2025, for the alleged offences punishable under Section 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 351(3) of BNS Act, 2023 @ 296(b), 115(2), 118(1), 351(3) of BNS Act, 2023 r/w. Section 25(1)(a) of Arms Act, 1959, in Crime No.585 of 2025 on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. This is 2nd bail petition. Earlier bail petition of the petitioner was dismissed on 26.11.2025 in Crl.O.P.No.32408 of 2025 on the following reasons:

“6. I have also gone through the FIR and other connected records which reveals that the petitioner has actively participated in this case and he is having 11 previous cases including two murder cases and four cases under section 379 of BNS Act, and he is a history sheeter and one case is POCSO and other offences, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.”

3. Considering that there is no change in circumstances and I am not inclined to reconsider the earlier order. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. Mpa Index:Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No To 1.The Inspector of Police 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. K.RAJASEKAR J. mpa CRL OP No. 2009 of

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial