Chennai Orders Court September 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The Tamil Nadu Petroleum vs State of Tamil Nadu Rep.by IT
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-25-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated : 25.09.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI and WMP.No.36749 of 2005 The Tamil Nadu Petroleum Dealers Association Rep. By its President Mr.M.Kannan (S/o.Murugaiah Mudaliar) No.8, Rajaji Salai Chennai 600 001. ... Petitioner Vs 1.The State of Tamil Nadu Rep by its Principal Secretary Chennai 600 006. ... RespondentsPrayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Declaration declaring the amendment of Rule 17(2) of the Tamil Nadu Standards of Weights and Measures (Enforcement) Rules 1989, published in Tamil Nadu Government Gazette Part III Section 1(a), Issue No.6 in pages 28 to 47 dated 16.02.2005 of the first respondent as null and void and consequently direct the 1 to 3 respondents not to collect any additional fees for verification and stamping of weights and measures under Rule 17(2) of the Rules.For Petitioner : Ms.Deepa Nandhini For Respondents : Mrs.S.Anitha Special...
Swami Karshni Anubhavanand, Vs Kothandam and 75 others
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-25-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 25.09.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR Swami Karshni Anubhavanand ... PetitionerVersus1.Kothandam 2.Jayanthi 3.Manikandan 4.Venkatesan 5.A.Shanmugham 6.P.S.Mani 7.R.Vimala 8.S.Kumari 9.S.Saradammal 10.P.Perumal (Died) 11.P.Parvathi 12.D.Danalakshmi (Died) 13.N.Arumugham 14.K.Veerasami 15.K.Arumugham 16.Senthil Kumar 17.T.Divakar 18.V.Arumugham 19.K.Sekar 20.K.Senthil Kumar 21.M.Mangalakshmi (Died) 22.Poongavanammal 23.M.Seenu sa 24.A.Abdul Rashid (Died) 25.K.Nagammal 26.K.G.Subramani Sa 27.Lakshmi 28.S.Varadappa Chettiar 29.Deivani Ammal30.K.Rajeswari Ammal 31.Lalith Bai (Died) 32.Rajammal (Died) 33.V.Marks 34.Syed Ahamad 35.Pitchaiammal 36.Gowri 37.Santhanam 38.R.Sakunthala (Died) 39.Roja Bai (Died) 40.Soundarapandiyan (Died) 41.Delli Babu 42.Baggialakshmi 43.N.G.Chandrasekaran 44.N.G.Iyyappan 45.Lakshmi Bai 46.N.Perumal 47.P.Parvathy 48.Indirakumar 49.P.Venkatesan 50.P.Gomathy 51.P.Sudhakar 52.P.Banumathy 53.S.Karpag...
K.Vaithilingam Vs T. Udhaya Chandran I.A.S.,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-25-2025
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25.09.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ K.Vaithilingam ...Petitioner Vs. 1.T.Udhaya Chandran, I.A.S., Finance (Pay Cell) Department, Secretariat, Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009. The State of Tamil Nadu. 2.J.Kumaragurubaran, I.A.S., School Education Department, Fort St. George, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009. The State of Tamil Nadu.3.S.Kannappan, The Director of School Education, DPI Compound, College Road, Chennai 600 006. 4.Dr.T.Rajendran, The Chief Educational Officer, Thiruvarur District, Thiruvarur. 5.M.Subramaniyan The District Educational Officer, Thiruvarur, Thiruvarur District. ...Respondents PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, praying to punish the respondents for willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.A.No.538 of 2023 dated 11.03.2024. For Petitioner : Mr.K.Karthikeyan For Respondent : Mr.J.C.Durair...
J.Renuka Vs The Chief Secretary
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-25-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 25.09.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR J.Renuka ... PetitionerVersus1. The Chief Secretary State of Tamil Nadu, Fort St. George Chennai-09.2. The State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by its Secretary to State Home Prohibition and Excise Departments Fort St.George, Chennai-09.3. The Director General of Police DGP Office, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai Mylapore, Chennai-04.4. The District Collector District Collectorate Chengalpattu Main Road off Manapakkam Kanni Koil Road Chengalpattu, Chengalpattu District-603 111.5. The District Superintendent of Police o/o.The District Superintendent of Police Chengalpattu main Road, Chengalpattu, Chengalpattu District-603 111. 6.The Commissioner of Police Tambaram, Chengalpattu District.7. The Inspector of Police E-8 Kelambakkam Police Station Kelambakkam, Chengalpattu District.8. S.Kishore 9.P.Narayanan 10.J.Kuppan 11.R.Elango 12.B.Prashanth 13.S.Kaviarasan 14.Janakiraman 15.Ravi 16.Govindaraj 17.Muru...
T.Duraimanikkam, Vs The Director General of Police,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-25-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 25.09.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR T.Duraimanikkam, Ex.Junior Assistant, S/o.V.Thangavel, No.915, Kamaraj Nagar, 2nd Street, Kumbakonam. ... Appellant -Vs- Thanjavur. ... RespondentsPRAYER : Appeal filed under Clause XV of Letters Patent, against the orderdated 07.11.2023 in W.P.No.11816 of 2015. For Appellant : Mr.M.Varunkumar For Respondents : Mr.E.Veda Bagath Singh Special Government PleaderJUDGMENT(Judgment of the Court was delivered by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.) Mr.M.Varunkumar, learned counsel appearing for the appellant wants to withdraw the writ appeal with liberty to approach the disciplinary authority for consideration of lesser punishment. The said statement is recorded.2. Hence, this Writ Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. However, there shall be no order as to costs. (R.S.K., J.) (H.C., J.) NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Speaking Orde...
Shyan @ Siny @ Shoba @ Raji vs State Rep.by, the Deputy Superintendent ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-25-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 25-09-2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE J. NISHA BANU AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR Crl.O.P.No.8787 of 2025 Vs. Ramanathapuram Police Station, Crime No.84 of 2016 .. Respondent passed in Crl.M.P.No.5283 of 2024 dated 25.09.2024 passed by the the condition imposed in Crl.M.P.No.1896 of 2021 dated 30.04.2021 that Crl.O.P.No. 8279 of 2025 vs Crime No.39 of 2016 ...Respondent passed in Crl.M.P.No.5282 of 2024 dated 25.09.2024 passed by the the condition imposed in Crl.M.P.No.1901 of 2021 dated 30.04.2021 that For Petitioner in both the Crl.O.Ps. : Mr.S.Sankarasubbu For Respondent in both the Crl.O.Ps. : Mr.A.Gokulakrishnan Additional Public ProsecutorCOMMON ORDERThese petitions have been filed to relax the condition imposed in Crl.M.P.Nos.1896 & 1901 of 2021 respectively, dated 30.04.2021 that2. Heard both sides.3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor raised objection for relaxing the condition stating that the petiti...
M.Suruliraj Vs K.GANDEEPAN
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-25-2025
WMP.No.7507 of 2022 in W.P.No.26633 of 2012M.DHANDAPANI, J.This miscellaneous petition is filed to implead the petitioners herein as party respondents in W.P.No.26633 of 2012.2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this miscellaneous petition is ordered.3. Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendment in the main petition. 25.09.2025 () ds https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
P.Udayakumar vs R.Chakrapani
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-25-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 25.09.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN C.R.P.No.1215 of 2024 and C.M.P.No.6343 of 2024 P.Udayakumar ... PetitionerVersusR.Chakrapani ... Respondent Prayer:- Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the fair and decretal order dated 14.12.2023 passed in I.A.No.1 of 2023 in O.S.No.17 of 2018 by the Principal Subordinate Judge, Ponneri. For Petitioner : Mr.E.Prabhu For Respondent : Mr.B.Sudir KumarORDERUnsuccessful plaintiff has preferred the present civil revision petition. A suit in O.S.No.17 of 2018 has been filed for declaration, recovery of possession, for damages for the use and occupation and for permanentinjunction. The defendant has filed the written statement, necessary issueswere framed, trial commenced.2. On behalf of the plaintiff, plaintiff examined himself as PW1 anddocuments were marked. Plaintiff's side evidence was completed and thereafter, the case was posted...
R.Narayanasamy Vs Union of India Rep. by its
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-25-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 25-09-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER and WMP Nos.19007, 20759 & 20760 of 20161. R.Narayanasamy2. M.Madhivannan3. R.Krishnamurthy4. K.Nagamuthu5. S.Sakthivel6. S.Srinivasa Rao7. S.Mariappan8. J.John Bosco ...Petitioner(s) Vs1. Union of India Rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Shipping, Transport Bhavan, NO.1, parliament Bhavan, New Delhi-110 001 2.The Chairman 3.The Secretary General Administration Department, 4.The Financial Advisor and Chief Accounts Officer, Finance Department, Chennai-600 001. ...Respondent(s)PRAYER This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking Writ of certiorified mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned Circular vide Proceedings No.A1/6921/ 2014/GA dated 22.04.2016 issued by the 3rd respondent and quash the same and consequently direct them to restore the earlier practice that has been prevailing in Chennai Port Trust with regard to the attendance....
Balasubramaniyam vs Nachammal
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-25-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 25.09.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE and In S.A.No.576 of 2018:1. Balasubramaniyam2. Jayanthirani ... Appellants Vs. Poovathal (died)8. Marayal @ Mariammal (died)9. Ponnusamy ...Respondents (R8 died, R9 who is already onn record, are recorded as L.Rs of deceased R8, vide order of court dt 20.05.2025) Page No.1 of 4 For Appellant : M/s.S.Parthasarathy For Respondents : Mr.M.Guruprasad for R1 to R4 Mr.K.Myilsamy for R5, R6 & R7 Mr.S.Sathyamoorthy for R8 & R9 In S.A.No.132 of 2020: 1.S.Mariyal @ Mariyammal (died)2. Ponnusamy (A1 died, A2 who is already on record, are recordedas L.Rs of the deceased A1, vide orderof court dt 20.02.2025) ... Appellants Vs.8. Balasubramaniyam9. Jayanthirani ...Respondents For Appellant : M/s.R.Sathiyamurthi For Respondents : Mr.S.Parthasarathy for R8 & R9 Served R1, R2,R3, R6 & R7 Unserved -R4 Page No.2 of 4COMMON JUDGMENTLearned counsel for the appellants seeks the permi...