Chennai Orders Court September 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
R.Thavamani Vs LIC Mutual Fund Asset Management Ltd.,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-24-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24-09-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI IN WP NO. 19045 OF 2020 R.Thavamani W/o. Thiru. N.Ramasamy, No.23, NRS Illam, 4th Main Road, Kasthuribai Nagar, Adayar, Chennai 600 020. Petitioner(s) Vs LIC Mutual Fund Asset Management Ltd., Rep. by its Regional Head South Zone, LIC of India, New No.153, Old No.102, LIC Annexure Building, Ground Floor, anna Salai, chennai 600 002. and 2 Others Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s): Mr.R. Murali For Respondent(s): Mr.R.S.Anandan for R1 and R2ORDERBeing satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this petition is ordered and W.P. No.19045 of 2020 is restored to file. 24-09-2025 To1. LIC Mutual Fund Asset Management Ltd., Rep. by its Regional Head South Zone, LIC of India, New No.153, Old No.102, LIC Annexure Building, Ground Floor, anna Salai, chennai 600 002.2. Regional Head South Zone, LIC Mutual Fund Asset Management Ltd., LIC of India, New No.153...
Hariram Kumar Vs K.Shanmugam and 3 others
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-24-2025
2025:MHC:2374 2025:MHC:2374IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24-09-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ Hariram Kumar Petitioner(s) Vs 1.K.Shanmugam The Superintendent of Police, Kancheepuram District, 2.Ponni, I.P.S., The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Kancheepuram Range,3.Shankar Jiwal I.P.S., The Director General of Police, Dr.Radhakrishnan Salai, Mylapore, Chennai 600 004. 4.Dheeraj Kumar, I.A.S., The Additional Chief Secretary to Page No.1 of 5 Government, Home (Police II) Department, Fort St.George, Chennai-600 009. Contemnor(s) PRAYER To punish the respondents 1 to 4 for their willful and international disobedience to the order of the Madras High Court in W.A.No.2597 of 2023 dated 04.01.2024. For Petitioner: Mr.H.Prosper For Respondent: Mr.P.Kumaresan, AAG Assisted by Mr.S.Senthil Murugan, SGPORDER(Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) The learned Additional Advocate General would subm...
M.A.VENKATAKRISHNAN Vs M.Nirmala (Deceased) 1.M.RANGAPRAKASH and 4 oth ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-24-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24-09-2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA M.A.Venkatakrishnan A-2, Fernhill Apartments, No.1, Rajarathinam Street, Kilpauk, Chennai 600 010. ..Applicant(s) Vs1. M.Nirmala (Deceased) 1.M.RANGAPRAKASHand 4 others No.19, Sambasivan Street, T.Nagar, Chennai 600 017., M.Shyamsundar (Deceased) W/o.Late M.Shyamsundar, No.19, Sambasivan S/o.Late M.Shyamsundar, No.19, Sambasivan ..Respondent(s)PRAYER : To direct the Defendants to deposit the calculated rent along with cumulative interest to the credit of the suit C.s.No.691 of 1982 for the Respondents/ Defendants own occupation and usage of the Applicant, for the suit B Schedule Property, since 18/06/1977, till the date of the Final Decree passed by this Honble Court on 27/09/2021. For Applicant(s): MR.G. Arun KumarFor Respondent(s): Ms.Kanishca for M/s.Nathan Associates for R3 to R5 Mr.R.Pravesh for R1ORDERThis Application has been filed by the plaintiff claiming a direction against ...
S.Balamurugan vs the Principal Secretary to
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-24-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24-09-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER and MP.No.1 of 2012 and WMP.No.35294 of 2019 S.Balamurugan Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Principal Secretary ToServices, Viswanathapuram, Madurai District Kalligudi, Madurai District Respondent(s) PRAYER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent in his proceedings No.1585/A3/Estt/TANSACS/2012 dated 11.08.2012 and the consequential reliving order passed by the 4th respondent in his proceedings Na.Ka.No.251/A1/12 dated 16.8.2012 and quash the same. For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.Nambi Arooran for M/s.Ajmal Associates For Respondent(s): Mr.E.Sundaram GA for R1 , R3 & R4 Mr.C.N.G.Niraimathi for R2ORDERWhen the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the prayer sought for in this Writ Petition has become infructuous and he has also made an endo...
Mani (died) 1. Kumari Vs Sakthivel
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-24-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24-09-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI IN Mani (died) 1. Kumari W/o. Kuppusamy, No.70, Mellatheru Ariyakoshadi, Parangipettai, Cuddalore and 3 Others petitioners in both the petitions Vs Sakthivel S/o Mani, 14A/4, Kavikalamega Street @ Kuttakara Street, Cuddalore OT, Cuddalore DT Respondent in both the petitions For Appellant(s): V.Balamurugan For Respondent(s):COMMON ORDERCMP No.4634 of 2024: The petition has been filed to set aside the abatement caused due to the death of the deceased sole appellant in the appeal. CMP No.4637 of 2024: The petition has been filed to bring on record the petitioners/proposed appellants as the legal heirs of the deceased sole appellant in this appeal. P.B.BALAJI.,J sr2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners.3. The respondent has been served in the appeal and he has not chosen to enter appearance till date. Hence, I deem it necessary to waive notice to the respondent.4. Both the petitio...
M.Natrajan Vs The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (Benami prohibitio ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-24-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24.09.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI M.Natrajan ... Petitioner VsChennai-600 034. ... Respondent PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records on the file of the Respondent and quash the impugned Show cause notice issued u/s 24(2) of the Prohibition of Benami Property Transactions Act, 1988 in F.No.: BPU- CHE/AF/MN/473/2022-23 dated 02.11.2022 as illegal, arbitrary and without jurisdiction. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Sivaraman For Respondent : Ms.M.Sheela, Special Public ProsecutorORDERChallenging the show cause notice issued by the respondent, this Writ Petition has been filed.2. When the matter is taken up, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that, as against the impugned show cause notice, the petitioner has preferred an appeal before the appellate authority.3. Recording the aforesaid submission, this Writ Pe...
J.Rajaiya Vs VELU
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-24-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 24.09.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA J.Rajaiya ... Petitioner -Vs- Mr.Velu The Inspector of Police E-9, Thazambur Police Station Chengalpattu (FIR No.194 of 2022) ... Respondent Contempt Petition under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondent for committing contempt of Court by wilfully and wantonly disobeying the order of this Court dated 30.08.2022 passed in H.C.P.No.1545 of 2022. For petitioner : Mr.C.D.Johnson For respondent : Mr.M.Babu Muthu Meeran Additional Public Prosecutor -----ORDER(made by A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.) Alleging that the order dated 30.08.2022 passed by this Court has not been complied with by the respondent, this contempt petition has been filed.2. The facts leading to the filing of this contempt petition are as follows:2.1. The petitioner filed a habeas corpus petition being H.C.P.No.1545 of 2022 seeking produ...
V.Loganayagi Vs Sugapriya, and Another
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-24-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 24.09.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYANV.Loganayagi . Petitioner Vs 1.Sugapriya, District Educational Officer (Elementary), Cuddalore District, Cuddalore. 2.K.Kalaiselvi, Block Educational Officer, Keerapalayam Block, Cuddalore District. . Respondents PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, pleased to punish the respondents for willfully disobeying the orders passed in the writ petition in W.P.No.7800 of 2024 dated 22.03.2024. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Nedunchezhiyan For Respondents : Mr.P.Rajarajeswari Government AdvocateORDERThis Contempt Petition has been filed for non-compliance of the order passed in W.P.No.7800 of 2024 dated 22.03.2024. 2.Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials available on record.3. It is seen that all the retirement benefits of the petitioner,except the pension, have been disbursed. The issue relating to pension remains pendi...
T.Gopal Vs G.Venkateshwara Rao
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-24-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 24-09-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI AND CRL A SR NO. 10576 OF 20251. T.Gopal S/o.Raghupathy, No.53-B, AIBEA Nagar, 1st Cross Street, Thiruvanmiyur, Chennai - 600 041. Petitioner(s) Vs1. G.Venkateshwara Rao S/o.Atcheyya Gorla, Plot No.5129, Ground Floor, 8th Street, Srinivasa Nagar, Ram Nagar North, Madipakkam, Chennai - 600 091. Respondent(s)PRAYER To condone the delay of 84 days in preferring this Appeal against the order of the Learned XXVII Metropolitan Magistrate Fast Track Court at Saidapet, Chennai in S.T.C.No.2402 of 2023 dated 23-09-2024 acquitting the accused and pass such further or other orders as this Court. For Petitioner(s): J.H.Batcha A.Praveen Kumar M.Meenatchi For Respondent:ORDERThis petition has been filed to condone the delay of 84 days in preferring this Appeal against the order of the Learned XXVII Metropolitan Magistrate Fast Track Court at Saidapet, Chennai in S.T.C.No.2402 of 2023 dated 23-09...
K.Rajendran vs Mrs.Dhanabakkiam
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-24-2025
CMP.Nos.6974 / 2020 and CMP.No.2288/2021 in A.S.No.511 of 2020 DR.A.D.MARIA CLETE.J. Both side learned counsel are present.2. This court in CMP.No.6974/2020, on 28.04.2025 has made the stay vacated.3. In CMP.No.2288/2021, the service has been completed in the appeal. Since the main appeal is ripe for final hearing and ordered to be listed so, this petition is closed. gv/ay 24.09.2025 (2/2) 1 of 1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »