Chennai Orders Court September 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Vijayalkshmi vs Chinnasamy(Died) 1. Dharmalingam
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-26-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26.09.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN1. Vijayalakshmi2. Karthikeyan3. Navaneethan ... PetitionersVersusChinnasamy (Died) 1.Dharmalingam2. Thulasi ... RespondentsPRAYER:- Civil Revision Petition Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, praying to set aside the order passed in I.A.No.7 of 2023 dated 19.12.2023 in O.S.No.159 of 2014 on the file of the Additional Sub-Ordinate Judge, Dharmapuri. For Petitioners : Mr.Krishnasamy Chinnasamy For Respondents : Mr.N.ManoharanORDERThe learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Civil Revision Petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the court bundle.2. In view of the above submission and endorsement made by thelearned counsel for the petitioner, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Index : Yes/No Speaking order : Yes/No Neutral ...
A.Logambal vs Peramayee
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-26-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 26.09.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE and A.Logambal ...Plaintiff/Appellant Vs. 1.Peramayee 2.A.Shanmugamurthy 3.S.Kalaivani4. S. Manoj5. K.Kanagambal ...Respondents PRAYER : This Appeal Suit is filed under Section 96 of CPC to set aside theJudgment and Decree made in OS.No.12 of 2015 dated 13.02.2020 passed bythe IV Additional District Judge, Erode District, Bhavani. For Appellant : No appearance For Respondents : Mr. C.Sriram for M/s.S.Lakshmanasamy for R1 & R4 Served - R5ORDERWhen this matter was called on 24.09.2025, there is no representation for the appellant and hence, this matter has been listed today i.e., on Page No.1 of 4 26.09.2025 under the caption, 'For Dismissal'. Even today, there is no representation for the appellant.2. Hence, this appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs. Index: Yes/No 26.09.2025Speaking/Non-speaking O...
S.Jothilakshmi, Vs Mr. Ravichandran (RDO)
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-26-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-09-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI S.Jothilakshmi, W/o. M. Siva Prakasam, Old No. 22, New No. 48, Chakrapani Street Extn, West Mambalam, Chennai 600 033.Petitioner(s) Vs Mr. Ravichandran (RDO) The Sub-Collector (Training) - cum - RDO Tiruvallur. Contemnor(s) PRAYER Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act to punish the respondent for willful disobedience of the order Dt. 03.06.2024 passed by this Hon'ble High Court in W.P.No. 12795 of 2024 For Petitioner: Mr.J.R.K.Bhavanantham For Respondent: Ms.S.Anitha, Special Government PleaderORDERThis Contempt Petition is filed seeking to punish the Respondent for willfully disobeying and violating the orders of this Court in W.P.No.12795 of 2024 dated 03.06.2024.2. The learned Special Government Pleader submitted that pursuant tothe order passed by this Court, the respondent has considered the petitioner's representation and passed appropriate order...
Mr. Manavalan and another Vs Mr. M.Meganathan and 3 others
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-26-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-09-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI1. Mr. Manavalan Senior Citizen S/o.Ramanjalu, No.340, M.G.C Nagar, Alamelumangapuram, Vellore-632 009.2. Mrs. M.Gowri Senior Citizen W/o. Manavalan, No. 340, M.G.C. Nagar, Alamelumangapuram, Vellore - 632 009. (Impleaded as R4 vide order dated 22.03.2021 In WMP No. 18932/2020 in W.P.No. Petitioner(s) Vs1. Mr. M.Meganathan The Regional Manager, Syndicate Bank, (Now merged with Canara Bank), No. 69, Armenian Street, Chennai - 600 001. 2.Mr. Janeeth, Branch Manager, Syndicate Bank, (Now merged with Canara Bank) No.41/49, Janakiram Colony, Arumbakkam Branch, Chennai-600 106.3.Mr. N.Varadarajan, S/o. Late M.K.Narayanaswamy, T.L.Pavithra Nagar, Seneerkuppam, Chennai 56. (Impleaded as R3 vide order dated 22.03.2021 In WMP No. 18929 of 2020 in W.P.No. 25914 of 2014) 4.Mr. R.Janeeth, The Senior Manager, Canara Bank, No. 41/49, A and B Janakiraman Colony Main Road, Arumbakkam, Chennai - 600 1...
R.Kannan vs Gopal
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-26-2025
This petition has been filed to bring on record the proposed respondent Devi, w/o. Senthil being the daughter of the deceased 3rd respondent Solamuthu as 6th respondent in the above second appeal and also to recognize the respondents 4 and 5 who are already on record are also the legal heirs of the deceased 3rd respondent.2. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the above petition, the Civil Miscellaneous Petition is allowed.3. Post this matter on 22.10.2025. vsn Note : Registry is directed to carry out the necessary amendments in the cause title in the Second Appeal. vsn C.M.P.No.11020 of 2021 in S.A.No.354 of 2021...
G.Mohanraj vs Executive Engineer
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-26-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26.09.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN Mohanraj : Petitionerversus4.M.Rupchand : Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent, 2nd respondent and 3rd respondent to consider the compliaints number 2025- 549JNK dated 29.01.2025 and 2025-725NLG dated 21.03.2025 by the petitioner inspect the site and verify the documents and erase the unauthorized / illegal construction grabbed by the 4th respondnet and in consequent to dispose the representation dated 2025-549 JNK dated 29.01.2025 and 2025-725NLG dated 21.03.2025 before the respondnets within a time-frame. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Mithera Paul For Respondents : Mr.D.B.R.Prabhu, Standing Counsel for respondents 1 to 3ORDER(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) The petitioner has sought is...
S.Arumugam vs a.Nellai Vadivu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-26-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26.09.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL C.R.P No.2076 of 2022 and S.Arumugam ..... Petitioner Vs A.Nellai Vadivu ..... Respondent PRAYER: This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to call for the records pertaining to complaint made by the respondent/complainant in DVC No.41 of 2022 pending on the file of the learned Special Judge for Trial of Domestic Violence Act Cases, Coimbatore and to set aside the same. For Petitioner : Ms.Niyamath Nisha for Mr.P.Govindarajan For Respondent : Mr.R.Prabhakaran for M/s.A.SivasubramanianORDERMs.Niyamath Nisha, representing Mr.P.Govindarajan, learned counsel on record for the revision petitioner and Mr.R.Prabhakaran, representing Mr.A.Sivasubramanian, learned counsel on record for the respondent are before this Court.R.SAKTHIVEL, J.uma2. Representing counsel for the revision petitioner submits that thecase in D.V.C No.41 of 2022 pending on the file ...
R. Balaji, vs Arulmigu Kayarohanaswamy
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-26-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26.09.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE in A.S.No.358 of 20211. R.Balaji2. AL.Alamelu3. P.Kalaiselvi ... Petitioners Vs.1. Arulmigu Kayarohanaswamy Neelayathatchi Amman Temple, Nagapattinam, Represented by its Executive Officer Neela Sannadhi Street, Nagapattinam Town and Munsif, Nagapattinam.2. A.Durai @ Manavazhan3. S.Thiagapari4. Krishnaveni5. Duraisingam6. K.Jadatharan7. K.Deiventhiran8. M.Rajeswari9. V.Ramachandran 10.A.Shanthi 11.K.T.Arasu 12.Jakulin Anbumani 13.Vijaya 14.K.Subbaiya 15.R.Kumar 16.A.Kannan17.T.Vairavananthan 18.K.Nedumaran 19.Latha @ Suthantharaselvi 20.C.Anitha 21.Kanmani 22.R.Vanitha 23.T.Thangakathiravan 24.S.Sivasankaran 25.R.Sowmiya 26.T.Rajeswari 27.K.Srinivasan ... Respondents(The Respondents 2 to 27 are given up in the first appeal filed by the appellants. Hence notice may be dispensed with the 2 to 27 respondents) PRAYER: Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 151 of CPC, to gra...
A.Kunnaiyan vs the Principal Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-25-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 25.09.2025CORAM:THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA and A.Kunnaiyan ...Petitioner Vs. Guindy-Velachery Main Road, Guindy 600 032. 3rd and 4th Floors, Puratchi Thalaivar Dr.MGR Centenary Building, Salem Circle, Salem 636 007. ...RespondentsWrit Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records of impugned order passed by the 5th respondent, vide S.O.No.82/2024, dated 29.11.2024 and quash the same and consequently direct the 5th respondent to reinstate the petitioner in service with all consequential benefits the same. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Sarath Kumar For Respondents : Mr.C.Selvaraj, AGP, for R1, 3 & 5 : Mrs.S.Mythreye Chandru, Spl.GP, for R2 : Mr.C.Kathiravan, Spl.GP, for R4ORDERWhen the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition. He has also circu...
C.P.Pazhani Vs The State of Tamil Nadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Sep-25-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 25-09-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER and M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 20151. C.P.Pazhani2. P.Samaraj3. M.Subramani4. B.Kumar5. V.Gomathi6. J.Rajasekaran Petitioner(s) Vs1. The State of Tamil NaduEducation, College Road, Chennai 6 Respondent(s) PRAYER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking Writ of Certiorari Mandamus to call for the records on the file of the 2nd respondent in connection with the order passed by him in his Proc. Na. Ka. No.97501/C1/E1/2015, dt 30.3.2015 omitting to include the petitioner's name in the panel and quash the same as far as the petitioners are concerned and consequently direct the respondents to include the petitioners in the panel for promotion to the post of High School Headmaster by taking note of the date of his/her appointment in the Feeder category and consequently promote them to the post of B.T. Assistant with effect from the date of promotion given ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »