Chennai Orders Court August 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
P.Thomas vs the Commissioner
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-26-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26.08.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR.MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN WP No. 11704 of 2025 P.Thomas Petitioner Vs1. The Commissioner The Greater Chennai Corporation Rippon Building, E.V.R. Road, Periamedu, Chennai-782. The Executive Engineer Zone- 10, Greater Chennai Corporation, No.117, N.S.K. Salai, 3.The Assistant Executive Engineer Zone 10, Greater Chennai Corporation, No.117, N.S.K. Salai,4. The Assistant Engineer Division-128, Unit -29, Zone 10 Greater Chennai Corporation, No.117, N.S.K. Salai,5. Susan John RespondentsPrayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issue of Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents 1 to 4 to Lock and Seal the entire building including the 1st and 2nd Floors of the building in Plot No.8, New Door No.2, Lambert Nagar 1 st Cross Street, Virugambakkam, Chennai 600 092 and proceed further with enforcement action as pe...
V.Mahendhiran vs the Government of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-26-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASRESERVED ON: 08-07-2025 PRNOUNCED ON: 26-08-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN AND WMP NO. 18883 OF 20251. V.Mahendhiran S/o. S. Venugopal, 114, J.N.Road, Arumbakkam, Chennai-600106. Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Government Of Tamil NaduPrincipal Secretary To Government, Commercial Taxes And Registration Department, Chennai-600 009. 2.The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes Chepauk, Chennai-600 005.Respondent(s) PRAYER Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of Certiorari, to direct to quash the G.O. (2D) No.100 dated 12.11.2024 of the Commercial Taxes and Registration (E2), Department and direct the 1st respondent to pay the incremental arrears (from 01.10.2018 to 30.09.2020) until the date of payment to the petitioner together with interest at 18 percent p.a and to pass such or other orders as this Hon'ble court.For Petitioner(s): Ms.Subhasree For Respondent(s): Mrs. Vasanthamala Stan...
Ganesan vs the Superintendent of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-26-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26-08-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR1. GANESAN S/o.Kullapa Gounder, D.No.115 , Kullappanaickenpatti Perumal Koil Kattuvalavu Kottamettupatti Anjal, Omalur Taluk, Salem District. Petitioner(s) Vs1. The Superintendent Of Police Respondent(s)PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India Directing the respondents to conduct a preliminary enquiry and take a decision in the light of law laid down in Lalitha Kumari Case in Pursuant to the Complaint of Petitioner dated 25.05.2022. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondent(s): Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan, Additional Public ProsecutorORDERThis Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents to conduct a preliminary enquiry and take a decision in the light of law laid down in Lalitha Kumari Case in Pursuant to the Complaint of petitioner dated 25.05.2022.2. When this Writ Petition is taken up today, there is no representation for the petitioner. Thi...
Mr.Pankaj Raghvendra Vs Ms.Shikha Chandra
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-26-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26.08.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU Pankaj Raghvendra Petitioner Vs. Shikha Chandra ... Respondent PRAYER: Original Petition filed under Sections 222 and 276 of the Indian Succession Act, XXXIX of 1925 read with Order XXV Rule 4 of the Original Side Rules praying to permit the petitioner to prove the Will dated 29.07.2005 in common form and that the Probate thereof, to have effect limited to the State of Tamil Naud, may be granted to the petitioner. For Petitioner : Ms.T.Kiran Rani for M/s.KNS Law Chambers For Respondent : No appearance ****ORDERThis Original Petition has been filed for issuance of Probate for the Last Will and testament dated 29.07.2025 executed by Mrs. Santosh Narain, who died on 19.03.2018. The petitioner and the sole respondent are the children of the testatrix. The petitioner has been appointed as executor under the Will.2. The petitioner submits that the testatrix got married to one Mr.BrajNarai...
Mr.M.Mohan Rao and 5 Others Vs No Respondent
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-25-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 25.08.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU 1.Mr.M.Mohan Rao 2.Mr.Ramesh Kumar Mohan Rao 3.Mrs.Anuradha Rao 4.Mr.K.Mohan Rao 5.Mrs.K.Shubha Rao 6.Mr.K.Santosh Mohan Rao Petitioners PRAYER: Original Petition filed under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act & Order XXV Rules 6 of Madras High Court Original Side Rules, praying to grant Succession Certificate to the petitioners herein with power to collect the securities and to receive the interest and dividends and negotiate and transfer the securities specified in the schedule hereto. For Petitioners : M/s.M.A.LakshmipathiORDERThe petitioners seek Succession Certificate in respect of the securities held by Dr.U.Mohan Rao, who died intestate on 18.03.1989. The petitioners are the legal heirs of the Mrs.M.Uma and Mrs.K.Thara, who are the daughters of the deceased, who died on 12.02.1999 and 05.05.2019 respectively. The petitioners 1 to 3 are the Legal heirs of Late.Mrs.M...
M.Vijayan Vs The Additional Chief Secretary to
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-25-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 25.08.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMARM.Vijayan, Assistant Commissioner/ Executive Trustee, (Under Suspension) Arulmigu Devarajaswamy Thirukoil, Kancheepuram. .. Petitioner vs Fort. St.George, Chennai 600 009. .. Respondent Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records connected with the Government Order issued in G.O.(D).No.70 Tourism, Culture and Religious Endowments (RE.2.2) Department dated 28.06.2018 passed by the respondent herein and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to reinstate the petitioner into service with all attendant benefits.For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ilamvaludhi For Respondent : Mr.K.Karthikeyan Government AdvocateORDERMr.S.Ilamvaludhi, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that during the pendency of the writ petition, the respondent authority has revoked the suspension order of t...
A.K.Prabhu Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu and 2 others
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-25-2025
and A.Nos.6127, 5404, 5603, 5604, 5399, 5609, 5664, 4769, 5401 & 6129 of 2023 & 530 of 2024 and 4956 of 2019 in The matter has been listed today under the caption "for being mentioned."2. The Registry is directed to issue a fresh copy of the order dated25.08.2025, by marking the appearance of Mr.M.R.Jothimanian, who had appeared for the third respondent / P.T. Lee Chengalvaraya Naicker Trust Board in Application Nos.5603 of 2023, 5604 of 2023, 6127 of 2023 and 6129 of 2023.3. The name of Mr.M.R.Jothimanian shall also be included in the last paragraph of the order.4. The fresh copy of the order shall be issued and uploaded within a period of four working days. O.A.No.66 of 2024 and A.Nos.6127, 5404, 5603, 5604, 5399, 5609, 5664, 4769, 5401 & 6129 of 2023 & 530 of 2024 and 4956 of 2019 in...
K.a.Asokan, vs the Special Officer,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-25-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 25.08.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR K.A.Asokan ... Petitioner(s) Vs.1. The Special Officer, Kuthiraichandal PACB Ltd., Kallakurichi Taluk 606 202,2. The Joint Registrar of Coop Societies, Villupuram Region, Muthuvel Layout,3. Thiru D.Mohan, Advocate ... Respondent(s)Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the proceedings No.Ka.2736/2011 Sa Pa dated 29.11.2011 of the second respondent along with the order dated 13.04.2010 of the first respondent, quash both the orders and consequently direct the first respondent to release the amount of Rs.3,84,472/- being the 50% of subsistence allowance due to the petitioner from 01.04.2003 to 29.05.2008 with penal interest.For Petitioner(s) : No appearance For R1 & R2 : Dr.S.Surya, Additional Government PleaderORDERThis matter earlier came up for consi...
V.Munivel Vs The Tahsildhar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-25-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 25.08.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMARV.Munivel .. Petitioner vs Tiruvallur District. .. Respondent Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records on the file of the respondent relating to the impugned order passed in Rc.2261/2018/A3 dated 30.11.2018, quash the same and direct the respondent to reinstate the petitioner into service and to treat the period of Suspension as duty for all purposes and grant him all consequential service and monetary benefits. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Saran for Mr.M.Ravi For Respondent : Mrs.S.Anitha Special Government PleaderORDERMr.G.Saran, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survives for consideration and thus the writ petition has become infructuous. He also made an endorsement to that effect.2. Recording th...
L.Nagaraj Vs A.Karthik IAS
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Aug-25-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 25.08.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR L.Nagaraj ... PetitionerversusSecretariat, Chennai ~ 600 009. Chennai - 600 097. ... Respondents Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, praying to punish the respondents for willful disobedience of the order of this Court dated 31.07.2023 passed in W.P.No.21659 of 2023. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Kasirajan For Respondents : Mr.D.Ravichander Special Government Pleader Page 1 / 4ORDERThe contempt petition has been filed to punish the respondents for willful disobedience of the order of this Court dated 31.07.2023 passed in W.P.No.21659 of 2023.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents and perused the documents placed on record.3. Earlier this Court has closed the present Contempt Petition on 24.06.2024and thereafter, re-opened it. Now, it is the contention of the p...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »