M.Vijayan Vs The Additional Chief Secretary to

M.Vijayan vs The Additional Chief Secretary to

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Aug 25, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1707644

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1707644
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice T. Vinod Kumar
Decided On: Aug 25, 2025
Case Number: WP/1146/2019

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

M.Vijayan

Respondent

The Additional Chief Secretary to

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated : 25.08.2025coram:the honourable mr. justice t.vinod kumarm.vijayan, assistant commissioner/ executive trustee, (under suspension) arulmigu devarajaswamy thirukoil, kancheepuram. .. petitioner vs fort. st.george, chennai - 600 009. .. respondent prayer: petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india, praying to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records connected with the government order issued in g.o.(d).no.70 tourism, culture and religious endowments (re.2.2) department dated 28.06.2018 passed by the respondent herein and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to reinstate the petitioner into service with all attendant benefits.for petitioner : mr.s.ilamvaludhi for respondent : mr.k.karthikeyan government advocateordermr.s.ilamvaludhi, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that during the pendency of the writ petition, the respondent authority has revoked the suspension order of the petitioner and the petitioner was also reinstated into service. hence, the cause in the writ petition does not survives for consideration and thus, the writ petition has become infructuous.2. the aforesaid submission is not disputed by the learned government advocate appearing for the respondent.3. recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is closed as infructuous. consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. no costs.speaking order / non-speaking orderindex : yes / no neutral citation : yes / no msv to fort. st.george, chennai - 600 009.t. vinod kumar, j.msv

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 25.08.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
M.Vijayan, Assistant Commissioner/ Executive Trustee, (Under Suspension) Arulmigu Devarajaswamy Thirukoil, Kancheepuram. .. Petitioner vs Fort. St.George, Chennai - 600 009. .. Respondent Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records connected with the Government Order issued in G.O.(D).No.70 Tourism, Culture and Religious Endowments (RE.2.2) Department dated 28.06.2018 passed by the respondent herein and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to reinstate the petitioner into service with all attendant benefits.
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ilamvaludhi For Respondent : Mr.K.Karthikeyan Government Advocate

ORDER

Mr.S.Ilamvaludhi, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that during the pendency of the writ petition, the respondent authority has revoked the suspension order of the petitioner and the petitioner was also reinstated into service. Hence, the cause in the writ petition does not survives for consideration and thus, the writ petition has become infructuous.

2. The aforesaid submission is not disputed by the learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondent.

3. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is closed as infructuous. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.

Speaking order / Non-speaking order

Index : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No msv To Fort. St.George, Chennai - 600 009.

T. VINOD KUMAR, J.

msv

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2025 Same Parties M.Vijayan vs The Additional Chief Secretary to Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice T. Vinod Kumar