V.Munivel Vs The Tahsildhar

V.Munivel vs The Tahsildhar

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Aug 25, 2025

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1732823

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1732823
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice T. Vinod Kumar
Decided On: Aug 25, 2025
Case Number: WP/2730/2019

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

V.Munivel

Respondent

The Tahsildhar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated : 25.08.2025coram:the honourable mr. justice t.vinod kumarv.munivel .. petitioner vs tiruvallur district. .. respondent prayer: petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india, praying to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records on the file of the respondent relating to the impugned order passed in rc.2261/2018/a3 dated 30.11.2018, quash the same and direct the respondent to reinstate the petitioner into service and to treat the period of suspension as duty for all purposes and grant him all consequential service and monetary benefits. for petitioner : mr.g.saran for mr.m.ravi for respondent : mrs.s.anitha special government pleaderordermr.g.saran, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survives for consideration and thus the writ petition has become infructuous. he also made an endorsement to that effect.2. recording the same, the writ petition is closed as infructuous. consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. no costs.speaking order / non-speaking orderindex : yes / no neutral citation : yes / no msv to tiruvallur district.t. vinod kumar, j.msv

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 25.08.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
V.Munivel .. Petitioner vs Tiruvallur District. .. Respondent Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records on the file of the respondent relating to the impugned order passed in Rc.2261/2018/A3 dated 30.11.2018, quash the same and direct the respondent to reinstate the petitioner into service and to treat the period of Suspension as duty for all purposes and grant him all consequential service and monetary benefits. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Saran for Mr.M.Ravi For Respondent : Mrs.S.Anitha Special Government Pleader

ORDER

Mr.G.Saran, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survives for consideration and thus the writ petition has become infructuous. He also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. Recording the same, the writ petition is closed as infructuous. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. No costs.

Speaking order / Non-speaking order

Index : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No msv To Tiruvallur District.

T. VINOD KUMAR, J.

msv

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2025 Same Parties V.Munivel vs The Tahsildhar Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice T. Vinod Kumar