Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

The Commissioner vs K. Srinivasan

The Commissioner vs K. Srinivasan

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jun 27, 2025
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1801587

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CMP/5968/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Commissioner

Respondent

K. Srinivasan

Excerpt

cmp.no.5968 of 2025 and w.a.sr.no.27283 of 2025dr.anita sumanth,j.andn.senthilkumar,j.(order of the court was made by dr.anita sumanth.,j.) mr.karthik jagannath, learned government advocate accepts notice for r2 to r4 and expresses no objection to the condonation of delay. r1 has been served and the description is printed in cause list.2. for the reasons set out in theaccompanying affidavit and there being no objection put forth by the respondents, the delay of 37 days in filing the writ appeal is condoned and this miscellaneous petition is ordered.3. registry is directed to numberthe writ appeal, if it is otherwise in orderand list the same for admission.4. mr.karthik jagannath, learnedgovernment advocate, in anticipation of the appeal being numbered and listed for admission, seeks, and has been handed over a copy of the writ appeal papers from the court bundle under acknowledgement. [a.s.m.,j] [n.s.,j] sl 27.06.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Full Judgment

CMP.No.5968 of 2025 and W.A.SR.No.27283 of 2025

Dr.ANITA SUMANTH,J.

and

N.SENTHILKUMAR,J.

(Order of the Court was made by Dr.ANITA SUMANTH.,J.) Mr.Karthik Jagannath, learned Government Advocate accepts notice for R2 to R4 and expresses no objection to the condonation of delay. R1 has been served and the description is printed in cause list.

2. For the reasons set out in the

accompanying affidavit and there being no objection put forth by the respondents, the delay of 37 days in filing the Writ Appeal is condoned and this Miscellaneous Petition is ordered.

3. Registry is directed to number

the Writ Appeal, if it is otherwise in order

and list the same for admission.

4. Mr.Karthik Jagannath, learned

Government Advocate, in anticipation of the appeal being numbered and listed for admission, seeks, and has been handed over a copy of the Writ Appeal papers from the Court bundle under acknowledgement. [A.S.M.,J] [N.S.,J] sl 27.06.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2025 Same Parties The Commissioner vs K. Srinivasan Same Judge Honourable Dr.Justice Anita Sumanth,Honourable Mr.Justice N.S...

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales