Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Jayaraj vs Mrs Saroja

Jayaraj vs Mrs Saroja

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jun 27, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1727619

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
SA/978/2009

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jayaraj

Respondent

Mrs Saroja

Excerpt

.....respondents : mr.t.dhanasekaran for r1 mr.g.ameedius, ga for r22 to r24judgmentthis second appeal has been filed to set aside the judgment and decree passed in a.s.no.38 of 2007 on the file of the additional district sessions court, fast track court no.1, poonamallee dated 23.01.2009 is against the judgment and decree dated 14.06.2005 made in o.s.no.268 of 1996 on the file of the subordinate judge at poonamallee.2. the learned counsel for the appellant is not present. by an orderdated 12.06.2025, the appeal was dismissed as against r2 to r4, 6, 8 to 11,13,17,21,26 to 28, 14 and 20. the matter is again listed today under the caption "for dismissal". the learned counsel for the appellant is not present and the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal any further.3. in view of the same, this second appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. no costs. consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. speaking order / non-speaking order 27.06.2025 index : yes / no neutral citation : yes / no gskc.v.karthikeyan, j.gsk to 1.the additional district sessions court, fast track court no.1, poonamallee. 2.the subordinate judge, poonamallee. 3.the sub registrar, alandur, 4.the district collector, chengalpattu, 5.the tahsildar, ambattur taluk, 27.06.2025

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 27.06.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN Jayaraj (alias) Bhiman ... Appellant Vs. 1.Mrs.Saroja, Rep by her Power Agent, Mr.Mahendran 2.Arjunan 3.Kasi 4.Maheswaran 5.Devaraj 6.Deenadayalan 7.Narayanan 8.Mrs.Kanbu alias Gnanambal 9.Mrs.Kannamani 10.Kumar 11.Panneer 12.Palani 13.Mani 14.R.Murugesan 15.Mrs.R.B.Lalitha 16.Elumalai 17.Ravi 18.Mrs.Ponniammal 19.Munusamy 20.Palani

21.Mrs.Devi 22.The Sub Registrar, Alandur, 23.The District Collector, Chengalpattu, 24.The Tahsildar, Ambattur Taluk, 25.Dharman 26.Yadhavaraman 27.Mrs.Chinthamani 28.Mrs.Sundari ... Respondents Prayer: Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.38 of 2007 of the Hon'ble Additional District Sessions Court, Fast Track Court No.1, Poonamallee dated 23.01.2009 is against the judgment and decree dated 14.06.2005 made in O.S.No.268 of 1996 on the file of the Subordinate Judge at Poonamallee.

For Appellant : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.T.Dhanasekaran for R1 Mr.G.Ameedius, GA for R22 to R24

JUDGMENT

This Second Appeal has been filed to set aside the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.38 of 2007 on the file of the Additional District Sessions Court, Fast Track Court No.1, Poonamallee dated 23.01.2009 is against the judgment and decree dated 14.06.2005 made in O.S.No.268 of 1996 on the file of the Subordinate Judge at Poonamallee.

2. The learned counsel for the appellant is not present. By an order

dated 12.06.2025, the Appeal was dismissed as against R2 to R4, 6, 8 to 11,13,17,21,26 to 28, 14 and 20. The matter is again listed today under the caption "for dismissal". The learned counsel for the appellant is not present and the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the Appeal any further.

3. In view of the same, this Second Appeal stands dismissed for non-

prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Speaking order / Non-speaking order 27.06.2025 Index : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No gsk

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.

gsk To 1.The Additional District Sessions Court, Fast Track Court No.1, Poonamallee. 2.The Subordinate Judge, Poonamallee. 3.The Sub Registrar, Alandur, 4.The District Collector, Chengalpattu, 5.The Tahsildar, Ambattur Taluk, 27.06.2025

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial