Chennai Orders Court February 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
P.Anandaperumal vs the Management of
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 28.02.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. DHANDAPANI and W.M.P.No.7601 of 2025 1.P.Ananthaperumal ... Petitioner in W.P.No.7165 of 2025 2.S.Chandrasekar ... Petitioner in W.P.No.7168 of 2025 Vs. The Management of Lakshmi Mills Co. Ltd., Kuppusamynaidupuram Post, Palladam Taluk, Tirupur 641 662. ... Respondent in both petitions Prayer in W.P.No.7165 of 2025 : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for records pertaining to the impugned order of the Industrial Tribunal dated 07.02.2023 in A.P.No.39 of 2012 and quash the same and consequently, direct the respondent to reinstate the petitioner with continuity of service, full back wages and all other attendant benefits. Prayer in W.P.No.7168 of 2025 : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for records pertaining to...
Prakasam vs Mani
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28.02.2025CORAM:THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA S.A.No.510 of 20181. Prakasam2. Pavayee ... Appellants vs.4. Marimuthu4. Ramasamy6. Elumalai7. Kandasamy8. Shanmugam9. Subramaniam10. Ammasi Nalla Gounder (Died)11. Chinnakannu @ Palanisamy ...Respondents S.A.No.511 of 2018 Prakasam ... Appellant vs.4. Arumugam5. The Block Development Officer, Veerapandi Panchayat Union, Veerapandi Post, Salem Taluk and District. ...RespondentsCommon Prayer: Second Appeals filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the decree and Judgment dated 29.11.2011 in A.S.15/2010 & A.S.No.16/2010 on the file of the II Additional Subordinate Court, Salem confirming the decree and Judgment dated 24.07.2009 in O.S.No.8/2005 & O.S.No.1986/2004 on the file of the I Additional District Munsif, Salem, respectively.For Appellant in both cases : Mr.R.Nalliyappan For Respondents in both cases : Mr.V.R.Rajasekaran for R1 and R2 For R5 in S.A.No.511/...
Mohamed Sathak Trust and another Vs Nil
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-28-2025
A.No.982 of 2025 in CS.DR.No.21717 of 2025K.KUMARESH BABU,J.Today, the matter has been listed under the caption for being mentioned at the instance of the learned counsel for the applicant. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the leave that had been granted by this Court is not under Section 92 but under a normal leave sue and requested this Court to modify the order dated 28.02.2025. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant. It has been brought to the notice of this Court by the learned counsel for the applicant that the order dated 28.02.2025 under which leave was granted was not under Section 92 of CPC. Hence, the Registry is directed to modify the las Gba 12.03.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No. 1 of 1...
Ashwini vs the Home Secretary
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 28.02.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR Ashwini ... Petitioner Vs. Puzhal, Chennai 600 066 ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 3rd respondent to grant extension of ordinary leave granted to petitioner's husband namely, Kathir, S/o. Palani, Convict No.9397 and PID No.458469, who is presently lodged at Central Prison, Puzhal-1, Chennai in W.P.No.1968 of 2025 dated 07.02.2025 by 10 days. For Petitioner : Mr.P.M.Basil For Respondent : Mr.R.Muniyapparaj Additional Public Prosecutor assisted by Mr.M.Sylvestor JohnORDERAND Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdraw this petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle.2. In view of the submission and endorsement made by the learnedcounsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition sta...
B. Lalithkumar and another Vs P.C. Vedagiri and 5 others
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-28-2025
A NO. 971 of 2025IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28-02-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU A N0. 971 of 2025 in C.S.DR.No.27320 of 2025 B. Lalithkumar and another S/o.Bhawarlal Jain, Door NO.49/1 and 2, Ramanuja Iyer Street, Old Washermenpet, Chennai 600 021. and another Applicant(s) Vs P.C. Vedagiri and 5 others S/o.Late P.R.Chittibabu Mudaliar, All are residing at New No.291/122, Solaiyappan Street, Old Washermenpet, Chennai 600021. and 5 Others Respondent(s) For Applicant(s): M/s. V. Premkumar S.Sriramulu D.Bhuvaneswari For Respondent(s):ORDERIn a proposed suit seeking for specific performance of the agreements for sale, the intending plaintiffs seeks leave to file a single suit the respondents/ defendants before this Court. 2.Learned Counsel appearing for the applicant would submit that the first defendant is a common party in both the agreements and the agreements relates to the same suit schedule property and substantial portion of the cause of acti...
Dr. S.Sivaraja, Vs The Teachers Recruitment Board
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated : 28.02.2025Coram:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN and M.P.No.1 of 2015 Dr.S.Sivaraja ...PetitionerVersus1.The Teachers Recruitment Board, Rep. by its Member Secretary, 3.The University Grants Commission, Rep. by its Chairman, ...Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records relating to the impugned proceedings issued by the 1 st respondent in Rc.No.12357/L1/2014 dated 22.01.2015 and to quash the same and consequently, directing the respondents to award weightage marks to thepetitioner for the service rendered in International University of Libyan University for the period from 24.10.2007 to 31.08.2010 (2 years and 10 months) as per Regulation 10.1 of University Grants Commission Regulations on minimum qualification for appointment of teachers in Universities and Colleges, 2010 as well as for the period from 07.12.2010 to...
K Kirubakaran vs State of Tamilnadu
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-28-2025
W.M.P.No.7938 of 2025 in W.P.No.7154 of 2025KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J.This petition has been filed to permit the petitioners to jointly file the instant writ petition.2. Being satisfied with the averments made in this petition, this Court is inclined to allow this petition.3. Accordingly, this petition is ordered subject to the payment of separate Court fee. 28.02.2025 nsa https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
N.Swaminathan vs the General Manager,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 28.02.2025CORAM :THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY and W.M.P.No.8179 of 2024 N.Swaminathan .. PetitionerVersus1. The General Manager, Food Corporation of India, Regional Office, No.8, Mayor Sathiyamoorthy Road, Chetpet, Chennai - 600 031.2. The Divisional Manager,Food Corporation of India, District Office, No.8, Mayor Sathiyamoorthy Road, Chetpet, Chennai - 600 031. .. Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st and 2nd respondents to pay a sum of Rs.28,39,926/- (Rupees Twenty Eight Lakhs Thirty-Nine Thousand Nine Hundred and Twenty Six only) pursuant to the work done under the Contract No.S&C/13/2/3/86, dated 05.08.1986 to the petitionerwith future interest at the rate of 12% interest from the date of present Writ Petition till the date of payment. For Petitioner : Mr.C.Suraj For Respondents : Mr.D.BaskarORDERThis Wri...
Sandeep Kaur vs Union of India, Rep.by, the Superintendent of Customs,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 28-02-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN AND1. Sandeep Kaur D/o. Hanca Singh, Chander, Ferozepur, Punjab - 142 060. Appellant(s) Vs1. Union Of India, Rep.By, The Superintendent Of Customs, Prosecution Unit Airport, Meenambakkam, Chennai - 600 027. Respondent(s)1. Sandeep Kaur D/o. Hanca Singh, Chander, Ferozepur, Punjab - 142 060. Petitioner(s) Vs1. Union Of India, Rep.By, The Superintendent Of Customs, Prosecution Unit Airport, Meenambakkam, Chennai - 600 027. Respondent(s)PRAYER To amend the jail address as Central Prison for Women in Puzhal Chennai instead of Central Prison, Puzhal Chennai in order dated 26.02.2025 in Crl.op. no 5239 of 2025 and thus render justice PRAYER To enlarge the petitioner / Accused on bail in R.R.No.04/2025 in O.S.No.155/2024-int air and O.S.No.1363/2024 AIR-B on the file of the respondent pass such other suitable orders. For Appellant(s): K.Madhu M. Sasikumar K.Giriraj For Respondent(s): Mr.S.San...
Arumugam vs S.Palaniappan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Feb-28-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 28.02.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R.KALAIMATHI and M.P.No.1 of 20131. ARUMUGAM S/o Angamuthu D.No.1/1002. ARTHANARI D.No.1/99thottathukarar Kadu3. JAGADEESAN S/o Aruugham D.No.1/1004. PONNUVEL D.No.1/98thottathukarar Kadu5. RAJAGOPAL S/o Perumal Thottathukarar Kadu Page 1/46. MEENAMBAL W/o Perumal Thottathukarar Kadu ..Appellants Vs.1. S.Palaniappan S/o Shanmuga Mudali Thottathukarar Kadu Marulayampalayam Village Salem Tk And Salem ..RespondentPrayer: The Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree dated 06.02.2012 made in A.S.No.90 of 2011 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Salem and reversing the judgment and decree dated 28.03.2011 made in O.S.No.626 of 2010 on the file of the IV Additional District Munsiff, Salem. For Appellants : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.K.Dhananjayan ----- Page 2/4JUDGMENTWhen the matter came up for hearing on 21.02.2025, there was...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »