Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

B. Lalithkumar and another Vs P.C. Vedagiri and 5 others

B. Lalithkumar and another vs P.C. Vedagiri and 5 others

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Feb 28, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1812135

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
A/971/2025

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

B. Lalithkumar and another

Respondent

P.C. Vedagiri and 5 others

Excerpt

a no. 971 of 2025in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 28-02-2025coramthe honourable mr justice k.kumaresh babu a n0. 971 of 2025 in c.s.dr.no.27320 of 2025 b. lalithkumar and another s/o.bhawarlal jain, door no.49/1 and 2, ramanuja iyer street, old washermenpet, chennai 600 021. and another applicant(s) vs p.c. vedagiri and 5 others s/o.late p.r.chittibabu mudaliar, all are residing at new no.291/122, solaiyappan street, old washermenpet, chennai 600021. and 5 others respondent(s) for applicant(s): m/s. v. premkumar s.sriramulu d.bhuvaneswari for respondent(s):orderin a proposed suit seeking for specific performance of the agreements for sale, the intending plaintiffs seeks leave to file a single suit the respondents/ defendants before this court. 2.learned counsel appearing for the applicant would submit that the first defendant is a common party in both the agreements and the agreements relates to the same suit schedule property and substantial portion of the cause of action for the suit arose within the jurisdictionof this court. 3.upon considering the above submissions and examining the draft plaint and the affidavit filed in support of this application, the first defendant is a common party in both the agreements and that the agreements relates to the same suit schedule property, the cause of action for this suit has arisen partly within the jurisdiction of this court. consequently, a.no.2280 of 2023 is allowed by granting leave to the applicant to sue the respondents/ defendants before this court. as a corollary, the registry is directed to number the suit, if it is otherwise in order. 28-02-2025 to1. p.c. vedagiri and 5 others s/o.late p.r.chittibabu mudaliar, all are residing at new no.291/122, solaiyappan street, old washermenpet, chennai 600 021.2. k.sanjeethkumar s/o.late p.v.kumar3. k.tharunika d/o.late p.v.kumar4. r.harinath s/o.late p.v.ravikumar5. mrs.vasuki kumar w/o.late p.v.kumar6. mrs.r.mala w/o.late p.v.ravikumar

Full Judgment

A NO. 971 of 2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 28-02-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU A N0. 971 of 2025 in C.S.DR.No.27320 of 2025 B. Lalithkumar and another S/o.Bhawarlal Jain, Door NO.49/1 and 2, Ramanuja Iyer Street, Old Washermenpet, Chennai 600 021. and another Applicant(s) Vs P.C. Vedagiri and 5 others S/o.Late P.R.Chittibabu Mudaliar, All are residing at New No.291/122, Solaiyappan Street, Old Washermenpet, Chennai 600

021. and 5 Others Respondent(s) For Applicant(s): M/s. V. Premkumar S.Sriramulu D.Bhuvaneswari For Respondent(s):

ORDER

In a proposed suit seeking for specific performance of the agreements for sale, the intending plaintiffs seeks leave to file a single suit the respondents/ defendants before this Court. 2.Learned Counsel appearing for the applicant would submit that the first defendant is a common party in both the agreements and the agreements relates to the same suit schedule property and substantial portion of the cause of action for the suit arose within the jurisdiction

of this Court. 3.Upon considering the above submissions and examining the draft plaint and the affidavit filed in support of this Application, the first defendant is a common party in both the agreements and that the agreements relates to the same suit schedule property, the cause of action for this suit has arisen partly within the jurisdiction of this Court. Consequently, A.No.2280 of 2023 is allowed by granting leave to the applicant to sue the respondents/ defendants before this Court. As a corollary, the Registry is directed to number the suit, if it is otherwise in order. 28-02-2025 To

1. P.C. Vedagiri and 5 others S/o.Late P.R.Chittibabu Mudaliar, All are residing at New No.291/122, Solaiyappan Street, Old Washermenpet, Chennai 600 021.

2. K.Sanjeethkumar S/o.Late P.V.Kumar

3. K.Tharunika D/o.Late P.V.Kumar

4. R.Harinath S/o.Late P.V.Ravikumar

5. Mrs.Vasuki Kumar W/o.Late P.V.Kumar

6. Mrs.R.Mala W/o.Late P.V.Ravikumar

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial