Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Prakasam vs Mani

Prakasam vs MANI

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Feb 28, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1813075

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
SA/510/2018

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Prakasam

Respondent

MANI

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 28.02.2025coram:the honourable mrs. justice r. hemalatha s.a.no.510 of 20181. prakasam2. pavayee ... appellants vs.4. marimuthu4. ramasamy6. elumalai7. kandasamy8. shanmugam9. subramaniam10. ammasi nalla gounder (died)11. chinnakannu @ palanisamy ...respondents s.a.no.511 of 2018 prakasam ... appellant vs.4. arumugam5. the block development officer, veerapandi panchayat union, veerapandi post, salem taluk and district. ...respondentscommon prayer: second appeals filed under section 100 of civil procedure code against the decree and judgment dated 29.11.2011 in a.s.15/2010 & a.s.no.16/2010 on the file of the ii additional subordinate court, salem confirming the decree and judgment dated 24.07.2009 in o.s.no.8/2005 & o.s.no.1986/2004 on the file of the i additional district munsif, salem, respectively.for appellant in both cases : mr.r.nalliyappan for respondents in both cases : mr.v.r.rajasekaran for r1 and r2 for r5 in s.a.no.511/2018 mr.v.ramesh, government advocatecommon judgmentwhen the matter is taken up for hearing today, mr.r.nalliyappan, learned counsel appearing for the appellant on record in both appeals reported that he had handed over the entire case bundle to the appellant. since no other counsel appeared on behalf of the appellant, the second appeals are dismissed for non prosecution. no costs. vum index : yes/nospeaking / non-speaking orderneutral citation : yes / no to1. the ii additional subordinate court, salem.2. the i additional district munsif, salem.3. the section officer, vr section, high court, madras.r. hemalatha, j.vum

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 28.02.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA S.A.No.510 of 2018

1. Prakasam

2. Pavayee ... Appellants vs.

4. Marimuthu

4. Ramasamy

6. Elumalai

7. Kandasamy

8. Shanmugam

9. Subramaniam

10. Ammasi Nalla Gounder (Died)

11. Chinnakannu @ Palanisamy ...Respondents S.A.No.511 of 2018 Prakasam ... Appellant vs.

4. Arumugam

5. The Block Development Officer, Veerapandi Panchayat Union, Veerapandi Post, Salem Taluk and District. ...Respondents

Common Prayer: Second Appeals filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the decree and Judgment dated 29.11.2011 in A.S.15/2010 & A.S.No.16/2010 on the file of the II Additional Subordinate Court, Salem confirming the decree and Judgment dated 24.07.2009 in O.S.No.8/2005 & O.S.No.1986/2004 on the file of the I Additional District Munsif, Salem, respectively.

For Appellant in both cases : Mr.R.Nalliyappan For Respondents in both cases : Mr.V.R.Rajasekaran for R1 and R2 For R5 in S.A.No.511/2018 Mr.V.Ramesh, Government Advocate

COMMON JUDGMENT

When the matter is taken up for hearing today, Mr.R.Nalliyappan, learned counsel appearing for the appellant on record in both appeals reported that he had handed over the entire case bundle to the appellant. Since no other counsel appeared on behalf of the appellant, the Second Appeals are dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. vum Index : Yes/No

Speaking / Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation : Yes / No To

1. The II Additional Subordinate Court, Salem.

2. The I Additional District Munsif, Salem.

3. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras.

R. HEMALATHA, J.

vum

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial