Chennai Orders Court December 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Krishnamoorthy @ Narayanasamy vs State Rep. by
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Dec-19-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 19.12.2025Coram:THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN1. Krishnamoorthy @ Narayanasamy2. Arumugam ... Petitioners Vs. State represented by The Inspector of Police, Kottakuppam Police Station, Villupuram District. ... Respondent Prayer: This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking suspension of pending disposal of the above appeal. For Petitioners : Mr.L.Vinoth Kumar No Appearance For Respondent : Mr.A.Damodaran, Additional Public Prosecutor *******ORDER(Order of the Court was made by P.VELMURUGAN, J.) This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed seeking suspension of 2 This appeal is pending from the year 2019 and there is no representation for the petitioners/appellants, which shows that the appellants are not interested in conducting the case. However, now typed set of papers are being made ready and this Court is also inclined to take up the main appeal itself for hea...
Shri M.Vasudevan vs the Customs Exicse and Service
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Dec-19-2025
2025:MHC:2986IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 19-12-2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH AND THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI& MP.No.1 of 2013 Shri M.Vasudevan Proprietor Of M/s Sun Mag International B-6 1st Floor, No.10, Ramanathan Street, Chennai 600017. ..Appellant(s) Vs Customs House, No.60 ,Rajaji Salai, Chennai ..Respondent(s) Prayer : Appeal filed under Section 130 r/w 35G of Customs Act, 1962 against the Final Order No.741/2012 dated 14.06.2012 on the file of the Honble Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South Zonal Bench, Chennai.For Appellant(s): No Appearance For Respondent(s): No AppearanceJUDGMENT(Judgment of the Court was delivered by Dr.Anita Sumanth J.) The matter had come up on earlier occasions when there was no response/representation on behalf of either party. Hence, it was directed to belisted under the caption for dismissal on 04.12.2025, when the following orderwas passed: This matter h...
P.Pichap Pillai Vs The Collector and Chairman
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Dec-19-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 19.12.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN P.Pichap Pillai ..Petitioner Vs.1. The Collector & Chairman, District Rural Development Agency, Cuddalore 607 0012. The Revenue divisional Officer, Vridhachalam, Vridhachalam Taluk,3. The Revenue Tahsildar, Veppur, Veppur Taluk,4. The Block Development Officer, Mangalur Panchayat Union,5. The Special officer/ Executive Officer, Keezh Orathur Panchayat, Cuddalore District. ..Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India toissue a Writ of Certiorarified mandamus to call for the records and quash the impugned order dated 16.11.2021 passed by 3rd respondent in his proceedings Na.Ka.Aa2/319/2021 and consequently direct the respondents to restore Ayyanar Koil Street, running through T.S.Nos.69, 70, 71, 72, 81, 82, 94 and 95 of Keezh Orathur Village, veppur Taluk, Cuddalore District. For Petitioner...
N.S.Pavalamani vs the Registrar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Dec-19-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 19-12-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN in W.P.No.33569 of 2024 N.S.Pavalamani Appellant(s) Vs 1.The Registrar Cooperative Societies (Housing) Tamil Nadu Cooperative Housing Federation Campus (II Floor) Veppari, Chennai 600 007. 2.The Deputy Registrar (Housing) Junction Main road, Near Raja Kalyana Mandapam, Salem.636 004. 3.The Administrator / Co-operative Sub Registrar (Housing) Perudurai Block J.K.K.Nataraja Nagar Cooperative Building Society Ltd. S.L.S.P.L.138, J.K.K.Nataraja Nagar, Komarapalayam, Komarapalyam Taluk, Namakkal District. 4.Tamil Nadu Co-operative Housing Federation Represented by Additional Registrar/Administrator Tamil Nadu Co-operative Housing Federation Veppari, Chennai 600 007. Respondent(s) For petitioner(s): M/s.S.Selvi For Respondent (s): M/s.Geetha Tamaraiselvan Special Government PleaderORDERThe Writ Miscellaneous Petition is filed to implead the respondents 3 and 4 herein, as respondents ...
T.Pappamal, Vs The District Collector,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Dec-19-2025
W.M.P.No.14758 of 2016 in W.P.No.17276 of 2016S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J.&C.KUMARAPPAN,J.This petition seeking to file a single writ petition, is ordered on payment of separate court fees. (S.M.S.,J.) (C.K.,J.) 19.12.2025 vsi 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
PANKAJ KUMAR PANSAL Vs M/S.Al Ameen Green Energy Private Limited
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Dec-19-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 19.12.2025Coram:THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN L.P.A.No.3 of 2022 and C.M.P.No.3070 of 2022 1.Pankaj Kumar Pansal Chairman cum Managing Director Tamil Nadu Generation & Distribution Corporation Limited (TANGEDCO), 2nd Floor, Eastern Wing NPKRR Maligai, No.144, Anna Salai2. R.KrishnamoorthyThe Chief Engineer/Non Conventional Energy Sources (NCES) 2nd Floor, Eastern Wing NPKRR Maligai No.144, Anna Salai (Cause title accepted vide Court order dated 17.2.2022 made in CMP No.2271/2022 in LPA SR.No.20485/2021 (PSNJ & SKJ) .. Appellants Vs. M/s. AI Ameen Green Energy Private Limited Rep. by its Chairman M.Basheer Ahamed Green Palace Complex No.67, Ramasamy Street Mannady, Chennai 600 001 .. Respondent Prayer: Letters Patent Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent Appeal against the order dated 06.03.2020 in Contempt Petition No.445 of 2019 in W.P.No.224 of 2018 passed by Honb...
The Commissioner of Customs vs M/S Tvs Motor Co Ltd.,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Dec-19-2025
2025:MHC:2989IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 19.12.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE K.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI The Commissioner of Customs (Port Export), Custom House, No.60, Rajaji Salai, Chennai - 600 001. .. Appellantvs M/s.TVS Motor Co Ltd., Jayalakshmi Estate No.8, Haddows Road, Chennai -600 006. .. Respondent Prayer : Appeal filed under Section 35 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the Final Order No.40093 of 2018 dated 11.01.2018 in C/158/2010-DB on the file of CESTAT, South Zonal Bench, Chennai. For Appellant : Mr.A.P.Srinivas For Respondent : Mr.Lakshmi KumaranDR. ANITA SUMANTH,J.andK.GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI,J.JUDGMENT(Delivered by Dr. ANITA SUMANTH, J.) Mr.A.P.Srinivas placed on record email dated 12.12.2025 to the effect that the mater falls within the monetary limit and that the subject case / issue does not fall under any of the exemptions listed in the Instruction.2. Recording the submission, this civi...
J. Jayaprasanth vs R.Padmini
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Dec-19-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 19.12.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR and C.M.P.No.6369 of 2023 J.Jayaprasanth ... Petitioner vs. R.Padmini ... Respondent PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to quash the D.V.C.No.22 of 2021 on the file of the learned IX Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet. For Petitioner : M/s.Supriya.R for M/s.P.Raja For Respondent : VacatedORDERThe learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the main domestic violence case has been dismissed for default and therefore, the prayer sought for in the civil revision petition has become infructuous and she has also made an endorsement in the court bundle to that effect.S.SOUNTHAR, J.dm2. Recording the same, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected civil miscellaneous petition is closed. 19.12.2025 Index : Yes / No Speaking order : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No dm ...
Thirthala Raghu vs State Rep by the Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Dec-19-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 19-12-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE C.V. KARTHIKEYAN in Thirthala Raghu Petitioner(s) Vs State Rep. By AWPS Madipakkam, Chennai. (Crime No.5.2023) Respondent(s)PRAYER: Petition filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Samhitha, to modify the condition imposed on the petitioner in Crl.OP.No.391/2024 dated 02.02.2024 to pay maintenance of Rs.20,000 to the defacto complainant by depositing the same on or before 10 th day of every succeeding month of English Calendar in Cr.No.5/2023 and on such deposit the learned Additional Mahila Court, Alandur, may handed it over to the defacto complainant on proper identification.For Petitioner Mr.N.Sudharsan Respondent(s): Mr.V.Meganathan, Govt. Advocate (Crl. Side)ORDERThe learned counsel for the petitioner appeared through video conference and stated that this petition may be dismissed as withdrawn and accordingly, this Criminal Miscellaneous Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. sm...
Chinnadurai vs Krishnakumar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Dec-19-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 19-12-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL and1. Chinnadurai2. Bakiyalaskshmi ...Petitioners/Petitioners/ Defendants Vs1. Krishnakumar2.Kavitha ...Respondents/Respondents Plaintiffs PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950, praying to set aside the Fair and Decreetal Order dated 17.10.2022 passed in I.A.No. 480 of 2022 in O.S.No. 130 of 2017 on the file of the Additional Sub Court, Virudhachalam. For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Gokul for Mr.S.L. Sudarsanam For Respondent(s): Mr.C.MunusamyORDERMr.R.Gokul, representing Mr.S.L. Sudarsanam, learned Counsel on record for the Revision Petitioners and Mr.C.Munusamy, learned Counsel appearing for the Respondents are before this Court. 2.The Representing Counsel for the Revision Petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Civil Revision Petition. To that effect, he has made an endorsement in the case file, and a scanned reproducti...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »