Chinnadurai vs Krishnakumar

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Dec 19, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1855890

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1855890
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice R.Sakthivel
Decided On: Dec 19, 2025
Case Number: CRP/1377/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Chinnadurai

Respondent

Krishnakumar

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated: 19-12-2025coramthe honourable mr.justice r.sakthivel and1. chinnadurai2. bakiyalaskshmi ...petitioners/petitioners/ defendants vs1. krishnakumar2.kavitha ...respondents/respondents plaintiffs prayer: civil revision petition filed under article 227 of the constitution of india, 1950, praying to set aside the fair and decreetal order dated 17.10.2022 passed in i.a.no. 480 of 2022 in o.s.no. 130 of 2017 on the file of the additional sub court, virudhachalam. for petitioner(s): mr.r.gokul for mr.s.l. sudarsanam for respondent(s): mr.c.munusamyordermr.r.gokul, representing mr.s.l. sudarsanam, learned counsel on record for the revision petitioners and mr.c.munusamy, learned counsel appearing for the respondents are before this court. 2.the representing counsel for the revision petitioners seeks permission of this court to withdraw this civil revision petition. to that effect, he has made an endorsement in the case file, and a scanned reproduction of the same is as follows: 3.in view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioners, this civil revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn. consequently, connected civil miscellaneous petition is closed. considering the facts and circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to costs. mps index:yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderinternet:yes neutral citation:yes/no to 1.the additional sub judge, virudhachalam. 2.the section officer, v.r. section, madras high court.r.sakthivel, j.mps, and

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 19-12-2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL and
1. Chinnadurai
2. Bakiyalaskshmi ...Petitioners/Petitioners/ Defendants Vs
1. Krishnakumar
2.Kavitha ...Respondents/Respondents Plaintiffs PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, 1950, praying to set aside the Fair and Decreetal Order dated 17.10.2022 passed in I.A.No. 480 of 2022 in O.S.No. 130 of 2017 on the file of the Additional Sub Court, Virudhachalam. For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Gokul for Mr.S.L. Sudarsanam For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Munusamy

ORDER

Mr.R.Gokul, representing Mr.S.L. Sudarsanam, learned Counsel on record for the Revision Petitioners and Mr.C.Munusamy, learned Counsel appearing for the Respondents are before this Court. 2.The Representing Counsel for the Revision Petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Civil Revision Petition. To that effect, he has made an endorsement in the case file, and a scanned reproduction of the same is as follows: 3.In view of the endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the Revision Petitioners, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition is closed. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to costs. mps Index:Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No To 1.The Additional Sub Judge, Virudhachalam. 2.The Section Officer, V.R. Section, Madras High Court.

R.SAKTHIVEL, J.

mps, and

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2025 Same Parties Chinnadurai vs Krishnakumar Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice R.Sakthivel