J. Jayaprasanth vs R.Padmini

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Dec 19, 2025

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1809521

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1809521
Court: Chennai Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice S. Sounthar
Decided On: Dec 19, 2025
Case Number: CRP/843/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

J. Jayaprasanth

Respondent

R.Padmini

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated : 19.12.2025coramthe honourable mr.justice s.sounthar and c.m.p.no.6369 of 2023 j.jayaprasanth ... petitioner vs. r.padmini ... respondent prayer: civil revision petition is filed under article 227 of the constitution of india, to quash the d.v.c.no.22 of 2021 on the file of the learned ix metropolitan magistrate, saidapet. for petitioner : m/s.supriya.r for m/s.p.raja for respondent : vacatedorderthe learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the main domestic violence case has been dismissed for default and therefore, the prayer sought for in the civil revision petition has become infructuous and she has also made an endorsement in the court bundle to that effect.s.sounthar, j.dm2. recording the same, the civil revision petition is dismissed as infructuous. no costs. consequently, the connected civil miscellaneous petition is closed. 19.12.2025 index : yes / no speaking order : yes / no neutral citation : yes / no dm to the ix metropolitan magistrate, saidapet.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 19.12.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR and C.M.P.No.6369 of 2023 J.Jayaprasanth ... Petitioner vs. R.Padmini ... Respondent PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to quash the D.V.C.No.22 of 2021 on the file of the learned IX Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet. For Petitioner : M/s.Supriya.R for M/s.P.Raja For Respondent : Vacated

ORDER

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the main domestic violence case has been dismissed for default and therefore, the prayer sought for in the civil revision petition has become infructuous and she has also made an endorsement in the court bundle to that effect.

S.SOUNTHAR, J.

2. Recording the same, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected civil miscellaneous petition is closed. 19.12.2025 Index : Yes / No Speaking order : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No dm To The IX Metropolitan Magistrate, Saidapet.

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2025 Same Parties J. Jayaprasanth vs R.Padmini Same Judge Honourable Mr.Justice S. Sounthar