Chennai Madurai Court June 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
P. Vellaichamy Vs. The District Collector, Trichy District and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-27-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to grant patta in Petitioner's name for the property situated in Trichy District, Thiruverumbur Taluk, Thirunedungulam Village in Plot Nos.18,26 and 27 in S.No.105/1B, 105/1C, 105/1E and 105/1F for an total extent of 6000 sq.ft by considering the Petitioner's representation dated 3.6.2016.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the respondents. 4. According to the Petitioner, he purchased the half of the land in Plot No.18 of the lay-out in question measuring an extent of 1200 sq.ft, by means of a registered sale deed, dated 17.12.2003 from Veeralakshmi @ Jeyamary. From the date of purchase, he is in possession and enjoyment of the property. He had applied for patta in his name in respect of the land before the Respondents f...
R. Sivashanmugasundaram Vs. The District Revenue Officer, Karur and Ot ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-27-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents men or agent from evicting the petitioner under the guise of removing encroachment in S.F.No.29/1G and 29/1H Puthampoor Village, Karur Taluk, Karur, by demolishing the petitioner house without following due process of law and pass further orders as this Court may deem fit and proper.) Nooty. Ramamohana Rao, J. 1. This writ petition is instituted seeking a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents or their men or agent from evicting the petitioner under the guise of removing encroachment in S.F.No.29/1G and 29/1H Puthampoor Village, Karur Taluk, Karur, by demolishing his house without following due process of law. 2. The respondents are arrayed as such are (1) The District Revenue Officer (2)The Revenue Divisional Officer, (3) The Tahsildar and (4) The Village Administrative Officer of Puthampoor Village, Karur District. The respondents are the public s...
N. Somasundarapandian Vs. The District Revenue Officer, Virudhunagar D ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-27-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to sub-divide the land comprised in S.No.284/7 of Pavali Village, Virudhunagar District and to issue patta in favour of Sri. Karkuvel Ayyanar Temple, Pavali Village within the time stipulated by this Court by considering the Petitioner's representation dated 3.3.2016.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the respondents. 4. According to the Petitioner, the Temple situated in Old S.No.77, New S.No.284/7 of Pavali Village, Virudhunagar District measures an extent of 0.6684 hectares originally belongs to one Yema Nadar's son Malayandi and Irulangudi Nadar. They bequeathed the said land to the Sri Karkuvel Ayyanar Temple before several decades and the Petitioner is in possession and enjoyment of the same. As a matter of fact, all th...
Tvl. Rama Vilas Agro Foods, Rep. by its Proprietor, Thiruvaiyaru Vs. T ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-27-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records of the first respondent in her proceedings in S.P.79/2016 in VAT No.54/2016 dated 24.05.2016 and quash the same.) 1. Since the issue involved in all these Writ Petitions are one and the same, they are all taken up together and disposed of, by this common order. 2. Challenging the conditional order passed by the first respondent, dated 24.05.2016, the petitioners-firm is before this Court. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the second respondent has passed the revised assessment order based on the inspection conducted on 18.06.2015 and determined the amount by levying penalty under Section 27(3) of the TNVAT Act. Against the same, an appeal was filed before the first respondent by remitting 25% of the disputed tax. Assailing the impugned orders, he submitted that the orders impugned in all these Writ Petitions are bad in law ...
M. Karuppayee and Others Vs. The Tahsildar, Madurai District and Anoth ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-27-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the Impugned proceedings in Na.Ka.No.A2/1337/2016 dated 23.02.2016 of the 1st Respondent and quash the same as illegal.) M. Venugopal, J. 1. The Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2. Recording the aforesaid fact and the endorsement so made, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed....
Surya Vs. The Tahsildar, Ramanathapuram District
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-27-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondentto issue Legal Heir Certificate in favour of the Petitioner.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the respondent. 4. According to the Petitioner, his father Pullani had two wives namely, Karral Ammal, who is the first wife. His father's first wife Karral Ammal had no issues and she died. After the demise of his first wife, the Petitioner's father had married one Mankachi Ammal as second wife and through her the Petitioner and sister Ulaga Madha were born. 5. The grievance of the Petitioner is that he is working in Tamil Nadu Police as Constable and his late father had some property in his native village. The specific stand of the Petitioner is that he and his sister Ulaga Madha are the only legal heirs of his father Pullani. He an...
P. Palanisamy Vs. The Joint Commissioner, H.R and C.E Department, Tric ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-27-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent herein to consider the petitioner's petition in M.P.No.2 of 2013 on the file of the respondent herein within the stipulated period.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. According to the petitioner, he filed M.P.No.2 of 2013 in O.A.No.9 of 2001 on the file of the respondent. The grievance of the petitioner is that the said M.P.No.2 of 2013 is pending on the file of the respondent without any action. Hence, he has filed the present writ petition. 4. Considering the fact that the petitioner's M.P.No.2 of 2013 in O.A.No.9 of 2001 is pending on the file of the respondent, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits and contents of M.P.No.2 of 2013 in O.A.No.9 of 2001, on the file of the respondent, at this stage, simpliciter, directs the respondent/Joint Commissioner, H.R and C.E De...
M.A. Ganesan Vs. The District Collector, Sivagangai District and Other ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-27-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to issue patta in favour of the Petitioner on the basis of the sale deed in Document No.1616 of 2016 dated 11.4.2016 of Sub-Registrar Office, Thiruppuvanam Within the period stipulated by this Court.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the respondents. 4. According to the Petitioner, he purchased the property from one G.Amsavalli, Wife of Govindan, by means of registered sale deed, dated 11.4.2016 on the file of the Sub-Registrar's Office, Thiruppuvanam and it appears that the said Amsavalli had laid a suit in O.S. No.166 of 2014, on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Manamadurai seeking declaratory relief of holding the sale deed, dated 22.11.2010 as null and void and for declaration and the trial Court had passed an e...
V. Karthik Raja Vs. The Tahsildar, Melur, Madurai District and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-27-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus seeking direction to the 1st respondent to change patta of the land situated in Vanjinagaram Village, Melur Taluk, Madurai District in Survey Nos. 116/1A1 , 115/3A and 115/4A admeasuring to an extent of 55 cents, 37 cents and 76 cents on western side respectively into petitioner's name by considering petitioner's application dated 09.05.2016 within the period that may be stipulated by this Hon'ble Court.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the respondents. 4. According to the petitioner, he has filed the present writ petition praying for passing of an order in directing the first respondent/Tahsildar, Melur, Madurai District, to change the patta of the land situated in Vanjinagaram Village, Melur Taluk, Madurai District in Survey Nos. 116/1A1 , 115/3A and 115/4A admeasuring to an e...
B. Maheswaran Vs. The Branch Manager, Canara Bank, Madurai
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-27-2016
(Prayer:-Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to provide education loan to petitioner studying B.E (Civil Engineering) first year at Kamarajar College of Engineering and Technology, S.P.G.Chidambara Nagar, Nagammal Campus, S.P.G.C. Nagar, Post Box No.12, Virudhunagar-626 001, by considering petitioner's educational loan application and representation dated 11.04.2016 within the time stipulated by this Honourable Court.) 1. It is represented on behalf of the respondent/Bank that the respondent/Bank had sanctioned educational loan of Rs.2,10,000/- to the petitioner, which fact is not disputed on behalf of the petitioner. 2. Recording the aforesaid fact, the writ petition is closed, as nothing survives for adjudication....