M. Karuppayee and Others Vs. The Tahsildar, Madurai District and Another

M. Karuppayee and Others vs The Tahsildar, Madurai District and Another

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Jun 27, 2016

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1190208

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1190208
Court: Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge: M. Venugopal
Decided On: Jun 27, 2016
Case Number: Writ Petition (MD).No. 11414 of 2016 & W.M.P.(MD).No. 8732 of 2016
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

M. Karuppayee and Others

Respondent

The Tahsildar, Madurai District and Another

Excerpt

(prayer: writ petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india for issuance of writ of certiorari calling for the records relating to the impugned proceedings in na.ka.no.a2/1337/2016 dated 23.02.2016 of the 1st respondent and quash the same as illegal.)m. venugopal, j. 1. the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw this writ petition. he has also made an endorsement to that effect. 2. recording the aforesaid fact and the endorsement so made, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. no costs. consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the Impugned proceedings in Na.Ka.No.A2/1337/2016 dated 23.02.2016 of the 1st Respondent and quash the same as illegal.)

M. Venugopal, J.

1. The Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. Recording the aforesaid fact and the endorsement so made, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.

Same Court & Year Chennai Madurai · 2016 Same Parties M. Karuppayee and Others vs The Tahsildar, Madurai District a... Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge M. Venugopal