Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

B. Maheswaran Vs. The Branch Manager, Canara Bank, Madurai

B. Maheswaran vs The Branch Manager, Canara Bank, Madurai

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Jun 27, 2016
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1190199

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Writ Petition (MD). No. 10384 of 2016
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

B. Maheswaran

Respondent

The Branch Manager, Canara Bank, Madurai

Excerpt

(prayer:-writ petition filed under article 226 of the constitution of india for issuance of writ of mandamus directing the respondent to provide education loan to petitioner studying b.e (civil engineering) first year at kamarajar college of engineering and technology, s.p.g.chidambara nagar, nagammal campus, s.p.g.c. nagar, post box no.12, virudhunagar-626 001, by considering petitioner's educational loan application and representation dated 11.04.2016 within the time stipulated by this honourable court.) 1. it is represented on behalf of the respondent/bank that the respondent/bank had sanctioned educational loan of rs.2,10,000/- to the petitioner, which fact is not disputed on behalf of the petitioner. 2. recording the aforesaid fact, the writ petition is closed, as nothing survives for adjudication.

Full Judgment

(Prayer:-Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to provide education loan to petitioner studying B.E (Civil Engineering) first year at Kamarajar College of Engineering and Technology, S.P.G.Chidambara Nagar, Nagammal Campus, S.P.G.C. Nagar, Post Box No.12, Virudhunagar-626 001, by considering petitioner's educational loan application and representation dated 11.04.2016 within the time stipulated by this Honourable Court.)

1. It is represented on behalf of the respondent/Bank that the respondent/Bank had sanctioned educational loan of Rs.2,10,000/- to the petitioner, which fact is not disputed on behalf of the petitioner.

2. Recording the aforesaid fact, the writ petition is closed, as nothing survives for adjudication.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial