Chennai Madurai Court June 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Indira @ Indhu and Another Vs. Senthilvelan
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-23-2016
(Prayer: This Criminal Revision Petitions is filed under Section 397 r/w. 401 Cr.P.C., praying to set aside the order passed in M.C.No.70 of 2010 on the file of the Family Court, Madurai against this petitioners and as well to enhance the maintenance allowance for both the petitioners herein according to the existing and sustenance price-hike and to bear the day to day expenses.) 1. The revision petitioners wife and daughter of the respondent seeks enhancement of maintenance. 2. The revision petitioners have sought for maintenance each at the rate of Rs.3,500/- p.m. in M.C.No.70 of 2010 in the Family Court, Madurai. The maintenance case is of the year 2010. Order was pronounced on 26.11.2013. 3. The learned counsel for the revision petitioners would submit that the respondent is well off, but, the petitioners are not so. The first revision petitioner is unemployed. The second revision petitioner is studying 8th standard in a school. They are living in Madurai. Rs.2,000/-p.m each would ...
M. Anbudass Vs. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corp ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-23-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to pay the retirement benefits with interest to the petitioner in view of the representation dated 30.05.2016.) 1. The petitioner was an employee of the respondents Transport Corporation. Seeking his retirement benefits, he has filed the present Writ Petition. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that the issue is covered by a judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in W.A.(MD).Nos.383 to 457 of 2015, dated 12.06.2015. He has further submitted that the respondents would consider the request of the petitioner in the light of the judgment passed by the Honourable Division Bench. 3. For ready reference, the judgment, dated 12.06.2015, passed by the Hon'ble Division Bench in W.A.(MD).Nos.383 to 457 of 2015, is extracted hereunder: "The learned Additional Advocate General submit...
G. Radhakumar Vs. State represented by The Inspector of Police, Dhalav ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-23-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to call for the records pursuant to the FIR in Crime No.639 of 2015 on the file of the 1st respondent dated 09.12.2015, as far as the petitioner is concerned. 1. This petition has been filed, seeking to call for the records pursuant to the FIR in Crime No.639 of 2015 on the file of the 1st respondent dated 09.12.2015, as far as the petitioner is concerned. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that Charge Sheet has already been filed in S.T.C.No.551 of 2016 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Rajapalayam. 3. In view of the above submission, this Criminal Original Petition is closed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed....
S. Kumaresan Vs. The Govt. of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to the ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-23-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records pertaining to the GO 93 of Health and Family Welfare Department (H-2) dated 25/03/2015 issued by the first respondent and quash the same.) 1. The Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner has given a letter, dated 16.06.2016, to the Registry, seeking permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition. 2. Recording the aforesaid letter, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are also dismissed....
Sadaipandian and Others Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-23-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to transfer the investigation pending in Crime No.115 of 2015 pending on the file of the second respondent police to the 3rd respondent and direct the 3rd respondent to nominate an efficient officer to investigate the case.) 1. This petition has been filed, seeking to transfer the investigation in Crime No.115 of 2015 pending on the file of the second respondent police to the 3rd respondent and direct the 3rd respondent to nominate an efficient officer to investigate the case. 2. Heard the learned counsel on either side. 3. It is represented by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) that a Special Team has been formed to expeditiously investigate the case and that the investigation will be completed shortly. 4. Recording the above submission, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to complete the investigation within a period of three weeks from the date of receip...
K. Muppidathi Vs. State Rep. by The Sub-Inspector of Police, Sankarank ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-23-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure to quash the charge sheet filed by the 1st respondent in C.C.No.36 of 2016 by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sankarankovil as against the petitioner) 1. Section 482 Cr. P.C., saves inherent power of the Court. Such inherent power can be exercised either to prevent the abuse of the process of the Court or otherwise to secure the ends of justice. Invoking such inherent power, this petition has been filed to quash the proceedings on the ground that the continuance would amount to abuse of the process of the Court. 2. A case in Crime No.82 of 2015 has been registered under Sections 147, 294(b), 324 and 506(i) IPC by the 1st respondent against the petitioner. After completion of the investigation, the Investigating Officer has filed a charge sheet before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sankarankovil, which was taken cognizance by the Magistrate in C.C.No.36 of 2016. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the pet...
T. Jebaraj Vs. The Inspector General of Registration, Chennai and Othe ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-23-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the 3rd respondent to register the sale certificate issued by the 4th respondent in favour of the petitioner pertaining to the property situated in Survey Numbers 13/2A3, 13/2B, with patta Numbers 557 and 1593 at an Extent of 2.15 Cents and 1.52 Acres respectively and make necessary changes in Book 1 of the Register.) 1. The Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner has given a letter, dated 17.06.2016, to the Registry, seeking permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition. 2. Recording the aforesaid letter, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs....
Dr. K.R. Sheeja Vs. The Regional Joint Director of Collegiate Educatio ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-23-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 2 to 4 herein to appoint the petitioner as Assistant Professor Chemistry (aided) in the vacancy caused by the retirement of one Dr.Mallikha M.Amernath on the basis of the petitioner's representation before them dated 08.09.2015.) 1. Learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition to which he also circulated a letter to the Registry seeking withdrawal of this Writ Petition, apart from making an endorsement, in the bundle. 2. In view of the above, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed....
Murugesan Vs. The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai Distri ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-23-2016
(Prayer: Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to direct the respondents to give Police Protection to the life and limb of the petitioner and his wife by considering the petitioner's representation dated 04.06.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed for a direction to the respondents to give Police Protection to the life and limb of the petitioner and his wife by considering the petitioner's representation dated 04.06.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel on either side. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, there is an undertaking given by learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) to the effect that the petitioner's representation dated 04.06.2016 will be considered suitably and orders will be passed thereon at the earliest. 4. Recording the above undertaking, this Criminal Original Petition is closed....
Minor C. Nancy Uva Praba Rep. by her guardian and mother R. Arockiya M ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-23-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of mandamus directing the 4th respondent to admit the petitioner in BDS Course as per the allotment order made in favour of the petitioner by the 2nd respondent on 30.09.2014.) 1. The Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner has given a letter, dated 21.06.2016, to the Registry, seeking permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition. 2. Recording the aforesaid letter, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed....