Chennai Madurai Court June 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
N. Ramalakshmi Vs. The District Collector, Tirunelveli and Others
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-27-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the fourth respondent to consider the application given by the Petitioner, dated 11.5.2016 along with the application dated 30.5.2013 for including the name of the Petitioner along with other legal heirs of Late. Sri.Narasimma Nayackar in the patta issued in respect of his properties situated in North Kuruvikulam and South Kuruvikulam, Tirunelveli District.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent of both sides, the main Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the respondents. 4. The grievance of the Petitioner is that he made representation to the Second Respondent on 30.5.2013 to include the names of other legal heirs including him in respect of properties of the Petitioner's father situated in North Kuruvikulam in S.Nos.95/6, 109/7A, 109/7B, 113/1, 123/31, 137/1A, 310/6, 336/3A. 249/5, 257/2, 365/2, 365/4, 9...
M/s. Dhaya College of Engineering Vs. The Anna University, Chennai and ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-24-2016
(Prayers in W.P(MD)No.10682 of 2016: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the fourth respondent to forth-with issue a Structural Stability Certificate for the Petitioner's Building without insisting on production of the approved revised plan of the third respondent. W.P(MD)No.10683 of 2016: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the third respondent to pass orders on the Petitioner's application dated 30.7.2012 submitted for approval of the revised plan.) Common Order 1. Heard both sides. W.P(MD)No.10682 of 2016 2. According to the Petitioner, the Petitioner applied for renewal of Provisional Affiliation for the academic session 2016-2017 and when the application for renewal was pending, the First Respondent in its non-booklet published in March 2016 deliberately failed to include its name in the list of affiliated...
V. Easwari Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District, Tir ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-24-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd Respondent to register a case against the proposed accused persons on the complaint of the petitioner dated 05.03.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd Respondent to register a case against the proposed accused persons on the complaint of the petitioner dated 05.03.2016. 2. There is no representation for the petitioner. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that already a case has been registered under Section 294(b) and Section 3 of TNPPDL Act, 1992 in Crime No.94 of 2016. 3. Recording the submission made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this Criminal Original Petition is closed....
The National Insurance Co., Ltd., Salem represented by its Branch Mana ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-24-2016
(Prayer: This Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree dated 13.07.2004 made in M.C.O.P.No.257 of 2002 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, (Additional Sub Court), Tenkasi. This Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree dated 13.07.2004 made in M.C.O.P.No.168 of 2002 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, (Additional Sub Court), Tenkasi. This Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgment and decree dated 13.07.2004 made in M.C.O.P.No.179 of 2002 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, (Additional Sub Court), Tenkasi. This Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the judgment and decree dated 13.07.2004 made in M.C.O.P.No.35 of 2003 passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, (Additional Sub Court), Tenkasi.) Common Judgment: 1. These Civil Miscellaneous Appeals and the Civil Revision Petition ha...
T. Devendiran Vs. State through The Inspector of Police, Madurai Distr ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-24-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Revision Petition is filed, under Section 397 r/w 401 Cr.P.C., praying to call for the records in charge sheet in S.C.No.191/2015 on the file of 3rd Additional Assistant Sessions Judge, Madurai, Usilampatti Camp dated 31.03.2016, set aside the particular charge for offence under Section 25 of Arms Act.) 1. A1 challenges framing of a charge under Section 25 of the Arms Act as against him in S.C.No.191 of 2015 by the learned 3rd Additional Assistant Sessions Judge, Madurai at his Camp Sittings at Usilampatti, Madurai District. 2. According to the learned counsel for the revision petitioner, taking the allegations Section 25 of the Arms Act is not attracted. Thus, charge No.3 framed under Section 25 of the Arms Act is unsustainable in law. 3. The learned Government Advocate submitted that in the F.I.R. Section 25 of the Arms Act has been added. In his final report the investigation officer has not included Section 25 of the Arms Act. However, at the time of framing of ch...
The Managing Director, State Express Transport Corporation Vs. Rasupil ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-24-2016
(Prayer: Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 173 of Motor Vehicle Act, 1988, to set aside the Decree and Judgment dated 14.06.2007 and made in M.C.O.P.No.468 of 2003, on the file of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Additional District and Sessions Court/Special Court, Pudukottai. 1. This appeal arises out of the award passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Additional District and Sessions Court/Special Court, Pudukottai in M.C.O.P.No.468 of 2003 dated 14.06.2007, awarding compensation of Rs.70,000/- together with interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum to the claimant. 2. The respondent filed the claim petition before the Tribunal alleging that on 11.09.2002 at 10.00 p.m, when he was proceeding by his bicycle, a bus bearing Registration No. TN-55-N-0120 came from Pudukottai in a rash and negligent manner dashed against the bicycle. Due to impact, the claimant sustained head injury and fracture on right thigh and left side shoulder and other grievous injuries. Immedi...
G. Bhagavathi Vs. The Tahsildar, Madurai District
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-24-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to dispose of the petitioner's application dated 28.01.2014 submitted for demarcation of the petitioner's property for the issuance of patta within a time frame as fixed by this Hon'ble Court.) 1. Heard both sides. 2. By consent, the main writ petition itself is taken up for final disposal. 3. No counter is filed on behalf of the respondent. 4. According to the petitioner, his representation dated 28.01.2014 addressed to the respondent praying for demarcation of his property for effecting sub-division and issuance of patta is pending till today, without any disposal. Hence, he has filed the present writ petition. 5. At this stage, the Learned Additional Government Pleader appearing on behalf of the respondent brings it to the notice of this Court that the petitioner paid only requisite charges in regard to the sub-division aspect. However, he has not rem...
E. Kanthan Vs. The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowm ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-24-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records in pursuant to the impugned tender notification issued by the 2nd Respondent vide Na.Ka.No.1910/1425/C4 dated 24.05.2016 and quash the same in so far as conditions Nos. 2 and 3.) Order: 1. Heard the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner; the Learned Special Government Pleader for the first respondent and the Learned Counsel for the second respondent. 2. The Petitioner has focused the instant writ petition praying for passing of an order by this Court in calling for the impugned tender notification issued by the second respondent in Na.Ka.No.1910/1425/C4, dated 24.05.2016 and to quash the same in so far as Condition Nos.2 and 3. 3. According to the petitioner, he is an authorised agent of 'The Hindu' New Daily for selling its products in Tirunchendur area and also preparing sweet items such as Halwa, Laddu and other snacks items and selling the same on or...
S. Shakila Vs. The State rep.by its The Sub-Inspector of Police, Sivag ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-24-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Revision Petition is filed, under Section 397 and 401 Cr.P.C., to call for the records pertaining to the order, dated 02.05.2016 made in Crl.M.P.No.855 of 2016 in PR.No.26 of 2015, on the file of Additional District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Manamadurai and set aside the order.) 1. This revision arises out of dismissal of the property return petition in Cr.M.P.No.855 of 2016 in P.R.No.26 of 2015, by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Manamadurai. 2. The revision petitioner is wife of A1. A1 is used to easily win over others by sweet words. He has fooled the de facto complainant by purchasing certain valuable items from him, he will become a lucky man. The de facto complainant tried his luck, ultimately burnt his fingers, because he was cheated. Based on his complaint, a case in Crime No.742 of 2014 under Section 420 I.P.C., has been registered by the respondent as against A1 and others. In the course of investigation, the Investigation Officer nabbed A1 and his as...
S.M.T. Alex Vs. The District Collector, Tirunelveli District and Anoth ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Jun-24-2016
(Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the impugned re-tender Bulletin dated 27.5.2016 issued by the third respondent in R.O.C.No.95 of 2016 and to quash the same and consequently to direct the respondents herein to call for a fresh tender schedule for the work under the Scheme of Tamil Nadu Urban Roads Infrastructure Fund(TURIF)-2016-2017 by fixing appropriate proper value and mentioning of correct place of work.) 1. Mr.A.Saravanan, Learned Counsel on record for the Petitioner submitted a letter, dated 21.6.2016 to the Registry, seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. The said letter is placed on record. 2. In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are dismissed. costs....