Chennai Madurai Court April 2016 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
P. Prabhu Vs. State Represented by The Sub-Inspector of Police, Madura ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to call for the records pertaining to C.C.No.107 of 2015 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court No.V, Madurai and quash the same and to pass such further or other order or orders as this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper in the fact and circumstances of the case.) 1. This petition has been filed to call for the records pertaining to C.C.No.107 of 2015 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court No.V, Madurai and quash the same and to pass such further or other order or orders as this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper in the fact and circumstances of the case. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State. 3. On reading of the final report, this petitioner got married to the defacto complainant's daughter and thereafter, they got estranged. While so, on 13.06.2015 at 06.35am, when the defacto complainant was going f...
R.G. Subbarayalu Vs. The State of Tamilnadu, Rep by its Principal Secr ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 217-L of the Tamil Nadu District Municipalities Act, 1920, against the order passed by the first respondent under Government Letter (g) No.630/eep.1/2015, dated 27.10.2015.) 1. This civil revision petition has been filed against the order passed by the first respondent under Government Letter (g) No.630/eep.1/2015, dated 27.10.2015. 2. Facts of the case: (i) The petitioner is the owner of the property in T.S.Nos.33 and 34, Door No.17/361, Suba Guest House, Bern Hill Road, Kodaikanal. The second respondent issued notice dated 07.07.2015, bearing reference No.UAC 2861/2007/F1, calling upon the petitioner to produce the approved plan and if the same is not produced, the construction being put up by the petitioner would be construed as unauthorized construction and called upon the petitioner to remove all the construction materials and stop using the building and demolish the unauthorized construction within 30 days. The second respon...
Subbulakshmi Vs. State Represented by The Superintendent of Police, Ti ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case as against the accused on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 16.12.2015 on the file of the respondents within stipulated time.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case as against the accused on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 16.12.2015 on the file of the respondents within stipulated time. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State. 3. It is seen that on the complaint dated 16.12.2015 given by the petitioner, a petition enquiry was conducted and was closed on the ground that the petitioner did not appear before the respondent police for enquiry. 4. In view of the above submission, the petitioner is directed to appear in person before the 2nd respondent along with this order and lodge a fresh complaint, containing the ver...
Natchammal Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Karur and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd Respondent to register a case based on the petitioner's complaint dated 11.03.2016.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd Respondent to register a case based on the petitioner's complaint dated 11.03.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that the complaint dated 11.03.2016 has been sent by post to the respondents. 3. In view of the above submission, the petitioner is directed to appear in person before the 2nd respondent along with this order and also contemporaneous wound certificate, if any, to lodge a fresh complaint, containing the very same contents as stated in the previous complaint dated 11.03.2016. On receipt of such complaint, the same shall be enquired into and action be taken thereon in accordance with law, if it discloses the commission of a cognizable offence or drop action otherwise...
C. Buvaneshwari Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Trichy and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case on the complaint dated 15.03.2016 lodged by the petitioner.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case on the complaint dated 15.03.2016 lodged by the petitioner. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that on the complaint, given by the petitioner, a case has already been registered in Crime No.6 of 2016 on 14.04.2016 for offences under Sections 498(A), 406 and 506(i) IPC. The said statement is recorded. 3. In view of the above statement made by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this Court is of the view that nothing survives for adjudication in this petition. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition is closed....
V. Sundara Mohan Vs. The Commissioner of Police, Madurai and Another
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 1st respondent to instruct the 2nd respondent to register the case based on the complaint given by the petitioner on 03.03.2016 and investigate the same and file a final report.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 1st respondent to instruct the 2nd respondent to register the case based on the complaint given by the petitioner on 03.03.2016 and investigate the same and file a final report. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State. 3. On reading of the complaint dated 03.03.2016, the dispute essentially appears to be civil in nature between the petitioner and his brother in law Varadarajan. Hence, no positive direction can be issued to the respondent police to register an FIR. 4. Therefore, this petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy before the appropriate forum in the manne...
K.S. Raja Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 1st respondent to transfer the investigation in the case of Crime No.671 of 2015 dated 17.12.2015 on the file of the 2nd respondent police to some other impartial investigating agency.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 1st respondent to transfer the investigation in the case of Crime No.671 of 2015 dated 17.12.2015 on the file of the 2nd respondent police to some other impartial investigating agency. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that the case in Othakadai Police Station Crime No.671 of 2015 has been transferred to the file of Assistant Superintendent of Police, Madurai Rural on the orders of the Superintendent of Police. 3. Recording the said submission, this petition is closed....
K. Ragulan Vs. The Inspector of Police, Thanjavur
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondent to register an FIR on basis of the complaint of the petitioner dated 03.03.2016. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State, who would submit that on the complaint dated 03.03.2016, given by the petitioner, a petition enquiry was conducted and the same was subsequently closed on 08.04.2016. A copy of the Closure Report is furnished to the learned counsel for the petitioner across the bar. Recording the same, this Criminal Original Petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out his remedy before the appropriate forum in the manner known to law....
S. Jothiramalingam and Others Vs. The Executive Officer/Joint Commissi ...
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the respondent herein from in any way evicting the petitioners from their shops situated comprised in Survey Nos.878/1, 878/6, 878/4, 872/2 and 878/7 respectively situated at West Ratha Veedhi/West Giri Veedhi, Adivaram, Palani, Dindigul District without following the due process of law.) Common Order: N. Kirubakaran, J. 1. It is yet another attempt made by the petitioners generation after generation to make Lord Palaniyandi of Palani as "real Aandi." 2. The petitioners are the occupants of the properties comprised in Survey Nos.878/1, 878/6, 878/4, 872/2 and 878/7 located opposite to Arulmigu Dhandayuthapani Swamy Thirukkovil, Palani, as per the pattas. According to the petitioners the lands comprised in Survey Nos. 878/1, 878/6, 878/4, 872/2 and 878/7 are being enjoyed by the petitioners and their ancestors were the predecessors in title continuously for many...
M. Karunakaran Vs. The Superintendent of Police
Court: Chennai Madurai
Decided on: Apr-15-2016
(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register the petitioner's complaint dated 19.02.2015 and 13.03.2015 and 07.05.2015 and to investigate the same in accordance with law.) 1. This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent to register the petitioner's complaint dated 19.02.2015 and 13.03.2015 and 07.05.2015 and to investigate the same in accordance with law. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that on the basis of the complaint given by the petitioner, petition enquiry is pending in CSR No.368 of 2015. 3. In view of the above submission, the 2nd respondent is directed to expedite the enquiry and complete the same within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The petitioner shall co-operate in the enquiry. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, the respondent polic...
- ‹ Prev
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 26
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- Next ›
- Last »