Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

P. Prabhu Vs. State Represented by The Sub-Inspector of Police, Madurai and Another

P. Prabhu vs State Represented by The Sub-Inspector of Police, Madurai and Another

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Apr 15, 2016
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1191396

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl.O.P. (MD) No. 6420 of 2016
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

P. Prabhu

Respondent

State Represented by The Sub-Inspector of Police, Madurai and Another

Excerpt

(prayer: criminal original petition filed under section 482 of cr.p.c., praying to call for the records pertaining to c.c.no.107 of 2015 on the file of the judicial magistrate court no.v, madurai and quash the same and to pass such further or other order or orders as this honourable court may deem fit and proper in the fact and circumstances of the case.) 1. this petition has been filed to call for the records pertaining to c.c.no.107 of 2015 on the file of the judicial magistrate court no.v, madurai and quash the same and to pass such further or other order or orders as this honourable court may deem fit and proper in the fact and circumstances of the case. 2. heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned government advocate (crl.side) appearing for the state. 3. on reading of the final report, this petitioner got married to the defacto complainant's daughter and thereafter, they got estranged. while so, on 13.06.2015 at 06.35am, when the defacto complainant was going for morning walk, this petitioner accosted him and kept knife on his neck and threatened him. other persons in that locality came to the rescue of the defacto complainant and separated the defacto complainant. 4. taking into consideration the nature of allegations, this is not a fit cast to quash the proceedings pending in c.c.no.107 of 2015 on the file of the judicial magistrate court no.v, madurai. hence, this petition is dismissed. however, the trial court may refer the matter to the mediation centre, where the parties may arrive at an amicable settlement. consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to call for the records pertaining to C.C.No.107 of 2015 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court No.V, Madurai and quash the same and to pass such further or other order or orders as this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper in the fact and circumstances of the case.)

1. This petition has been filed to call for the records pertaining to C.C.No.107 of 2015 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court No.V, Madurai and quash the same and to pass such further or other order or orders as this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper in the fact and circumstances of the case.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the State.

3. On reading of the final report, this petitioner got married to the defacto complainant's daughter and thereafter, they got estranged. While so, on 13.06.2015 at 06.35am, when the defacto complainant was going for morning walk, this petitioner accosted him and kept knife on his neck and threatened him. Other persons in that locality came to the rescue of the defacto complainant and separated the defacto complainant.

4. Taking into consideration the nature of allegations, this is not a fit cast to quash the proceedings pending in C.C.No.107 of 2015 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate Court No.V, Madurai. Hence, this petition is dismissed. However, the Trial Court may refer the matter to the Mediation Centre, where the parties may arrive at an amicable settlement. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial