Andhra Pradesh Court September 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S.Siva Sai Granites, Gunt Vs. the Government of Andhra Pradesh,repre ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.27094 of 2013 DATED:19-09-2013 M/s.Siva Sai Granites, Guntur.Petitioner The Government of Andhra Pradesh,represented by its Secretary, Hyderabad and others .Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Smt. P.Vijaya Lakshmi Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3: Government Pleader for Mines and Geology Counsel for respondent No.4: Assistant Government Pleader for Home : : ?.Cases referred: 1.2010 (1) ALD812THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.27094 of 2013 Date: 19.09.2013 ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in seizing the lorry bearing registration No.PB13Z0906along with finished product of black granite slabs belonging to the petitioner as illegal and arbitrary. When this writ petition came up for admission and hearing on 18.09.2013, the learned Government Pleader for Mines and Geology sought for a passover for instructions and as the case could not be take...
B.S.P.Ravikumar and Anoth Vs. the State of A.P., Rep. by Itsprincipal
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT WRIT PETITION No.7033 OF2013Date:19. 09-2013 B.S.P.Ravi Kumar and another.. Petitioners The State of A.P., rep. by its Principal Secretary to Government, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others....Respondents Counsel for the petitioners :Sri T.Suryakaran Reddy Counsel for respondents 1 & 2: GP for Services-I ^Counsel for respondents 3 to 9:M/s. J.Sudheer and Ashok Anand Kumar HEAD NOTE: ?.CASES REFERRED:1. (1997) 3 SCC592. (1983) 3 SCC284HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT WRIT PETITION No.7033 OF2013ORDER: (Per Hon'ble Sri Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) The petitioners challenge the order dated 20-04-2012 passed by the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad (for short ".the Tribunal".), in O.A. No.6546 of 2010 that was filed by respondents 3 to 9. The Tribunal allowed the O.A.2. Briefly stated, the facts are: The Armed Reserve, a ...
G.A.Rama Ra Vs. Union of India and Anothe
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE S.V.BHATT Writ Petition No.27145 of 2013 Dated 19-09-2013 G.A.Rama Rao.....Petitioner Union of India and another.....Respondents Counsel for the petitioner : Sr.Pavan Kumar Counsel for respondents : Assistant Solicitor General HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred: 1. (1991) 4 SCC109THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE S.V.BHATT W.P.No.27145 of 2013 ORDER: (Per LNR,J.The petitioner is working as Assistant Commissioner of Customs and Central Excise at Hyderabad. The relevant service rules provide for financial upgradation (for short 'upgradation').in lieu of promotion, depending on the facts and circumstances. The petitioner was extended two upgradations and he became due for the third upgradation in 2011. The eligibility of an Assistant Commissioner to be extended the benefit of upgradation is assessed by the Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) by undertaking an exercise, akin to the one for pro...
1. M/S.Sri Venkateswara Chemical Industr Vs. 1. Kambampati Ramakrishna ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
THE HON'BLE Ms.JUSTICE G.ROHINI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1573 of 2013 CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4115 of 2013 dated:19-09-2013 1. M/s.Sr.Venkateswara Chemical Industries,Machavaram, Machilipatnam, rep. by its Managing Partner, Maddula Panduranga Rao,and another....Appellants 1. Kambampati Ramakrishna Rao and others...Respondents : Counsel for the appellants: Sr.C.V.Mohan Reddy, Senior Counsel representing Sr.PaRs.Ananth Nageswar Rao Counsel for the respondents 1 to 7: ^Counsel for the 8th respondent : Sr.Govardhan Venu Cases referred : 1. 2012 (2) ALD418THE HON'BLE Ms.JUSTICE G.ROHINI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1573 of 2013 AND CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.4115 of 2013 Dated: 19.09.2013 Common Order: The petitioners in these two Revision Petitions are the defendants 1 and 3 in O.S.No.152/1988 on the file of the Court of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Machilipatnam. The said suit was filed by the respondent No.1 herein for recovery of money and the same was decreed for a sum of Rs.34...
Gundapuneni Janaki Rama Rao,s/O Ranga Ra Vs. the Govt of A.P., Reptd b ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-19-2013
HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.20120 of 2013 dated:19-09-2013 Gundapuneni Janaki Rama Rao,S/o Ranga Rao and two others.....Petitioner The Govt of A.P., reptd by its Secretary,Revenue Department, Hyderabad and seven others......Respondents Counsel for the PetitioneRs.Sr.J.Venkateswara REddy Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 to 4: Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue Counsel for Respondent No.5: Sr.G.Visweshwar Reddy Standing Counsel for KUDA Counsel for Respondent Nos.6 to 8: Sr.V.Manohar Rao : ?.Cases Referred: NIL The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the inaction of respondent Nos.1 to 4 in giving effect to Memo bearing No.38583/UC.II(3)/05-2, dated 15.07.2008 and proceedings No.E2/1797/05, dated 12.03.2010, of respondent Nos.1 and 2, respectively, as illegal and arbitrary. The petitioners pleaded that they are the owners of certain lands in Survey No.869 of Waddepally Village, Hanmakonda Mandal, Warangal Di...
N.R. Kannan and Anoth Vs. the Chief General Manager,telecommunicat
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-18-2013
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT WRIT PETITION No.5931 OF2000Dated:18-09-2013 N.R. Kannan and another.. Petitioners The Chief General Manager,Telecommunications,A.P. Circle, Hyderabad and others.. Respondents Counsel for the petitioners :Dr. A. Raghu Kumar Counsel for respondents 1 to 3:B. Narasimha Sarma HEAD NOTE: ?.CASES REFERRED: HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT WRIT PETITION No.5931 OF2000ORDER: (Per Hon'ble Sri Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) The petitioners herein were appointed as Stenographers in the 1st respondent organization on 22-12-1976 and 22-03-1977 respectively. On their request, both of them have been transferred to Hyderabad Telecom District (for short ".HTD".) on 09-07-1980 and 01-08-1983 respectively. As provided for under the relevant rules, they have taken the last place in the seniority in that category of the said unit. At a later stage, the entire unit of the HT...
Smt. S. Shantha and Oth Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh,represented
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-18-2013
HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.Nos.24881 of 2013 dated:18-9-2013 W.P.No.24881/2013 Smt.S.Shantha and others.Petitioners The State of Andhra Pradesh,Represented by its Principal Secretary,Industries & Commerce (Mines-I) Department,Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad and others.Respondents Counsel for petitioners : Sr.K.S.Murthy Counsel for respondents : Assistant Government Pleader for Mines & Geology HEAD NOTE: ?.CASES REFERRED : Nil HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.Nos.24881, 24893, 24928 and 25213 of 2013 Date : 18-9-2013 W.P.No.24881/2013 The Court made the following : COMMON JUDGMENT: As these Writ Petitions involve common issues, they are heard and being disposed of together. The petitioners are agriculturists of different villages and different Mandals in Mahabubnagar District. They have approached the District Water Management Agency, Mahabubnagar (DWMA) for grant of permission for decasting of sand due to floods to various streams by the side of which...
Ahmed Nizamud Vs. Mohd.GhaziuddIn Hasan and Oth
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-17-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L .NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE S.V.BHATT CCCA No.227 of 2010 (Judgment of the Bench delivered by the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) dated:17-09-2013 Ahmed Nizamuddin ..appellant Mohd.Ghaziuddin Hasan and others ..Respondents Counsel for the appellant: Sr.B. Adinarayana Rao, Sr.Counsel Counsel for the Respondents: Sr.D. Prakash Reddy, Sr.Counsel HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE S.V.BHATT CCCA No.227 of 2010 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) This appeal is filed by the 1st defendant in O.S.No.347 of 2004 on the file of the IX Additional Chief Judge (Fast Track Court).City Civil Court, Hyderabad against the judgment and decree dated 30-08-2010. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to, as arrayed in the suit. The plaintiffs filed the suit for the relief of, a) declaration that the plaintiffs alone are the owners of the suit schedule property...
M/S. Baba Stone Crusher Rep. by Its Prop Vs. the Assistant Director of ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-17-2013
THE HONOURABLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.26968 of 2013 Dated:17-09-2013 M/S.Baba Stone Crusher rep. by its Proprietor Ch.Sivaiah....Petitioner The Assistant Director of Mines and Geology (Vigilance).Guntur and others..Respondents Counsel for Petitioner: Mr.Pannala Srinivas Counsel for Respondents: GP for Mines & Geology. HEAD NOTE: ?.CITATIONS: AIR1966SC671(2010) 2 SCC497(2010) 3 SCC732(2010) 4 SCC785HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.26968 of 2013 Dated:17.09.2013 The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a Mandamus to set aside demand notice No.704/Vg/2013-1, dated 05.09.2013, of respondent No.1, whereby he has levied a sum of Rs.93,64,668/- comprising Rs.15,60,778/- towards normal seigniorage fee and Rs.78,03,890/- towards five times the normal seigniorage fee as penalty. I have heard Mr.Pannala Srinivas, learned counsel for the petitioner, and the learned Government Pleader for Mines & Geology. The petiti...
Anapalli Bhaskar and Other Vs. Gudi Venkateswarlu and Other
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-16-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR REVIEW CRP MP NO.1362 OF2013AND BATCH DATED16H SEPTEMBER, 2013 Anapalli Bhaskar and others...Petitioners/Respondents Gudi Venkateswarlu and others...Respondents/Revision Petitioners Counsel for petitioneRs.Sr.Srinivas Karra Counsel for respondents: Sr.T.C.Krishnan HEAD NOTE: THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR REVIEW CRP MP NO.1362 OF2013IN C.R.P.NO.6291 OF2012ORDER C.R.P.No.6291 of 2012 was allowed by a learned Judge of this Court, since retired. The respondents in the CRP seek review of the said order. The petitioners in the C.R.P.are the defendants in O.S.No.744 of 2007 on the file of the learned I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Nellore. The respondents in the CRP, the review petitioneRs.are the plaintiffs therein. This suit was instituted seeking cancellation of three sale deeds dated 13.08.1990 said to have been executed by late Anapalli Vandanam and late Rondla Ademma. The case of the plaintiffs is that they are the legal heirs of Anapalli Vand...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »