Andhra Pradesh Court September 2013 Judgments
Yellapragada Prabhakara Ra Vs. Southern Power Distribution Co., of A.P ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-30-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR WRIT PETITION No.1374 of 2010 30-09-2013 Yellapragada Prabhakara Rao ....Petitioner Southern Power Distribution Co., of A.P. Ltd. rep. By its chairman and Managing Director Tirupathi, Chittoor District and others.... Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri S.Ravindranath Counsel for Respondents: Sri P.Laxma Reddy, SC for APTRANCO : : ?.Cases referred:2005. (3) ALT525(DB) The Court made the following Order: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR W.P. No.1374 of 2010 Oral Order: The petitioner seeks for a Writ of Mandamus to declare that the order of his dismissal as illegal and to reinstate him into service with all attendant benefits.2. The petitioner joined in the service as Helper on 12-05-1984. On the basis of Matriculation Certificate, he disclosed his date of birth as 12-02-1953. It was so entered in the office records. In 1991, the petitioner was promoted as Lineman. Later, the petitioner was converted as Lower Division Clerk (LDC) during t...
Tag this Judgment!Smt. M. Sridevi Vs. the Senior Divisional Manager National Insurance C ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Sep-30-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Member) 1. The unsuccessful complainant is the appellant. The appellant is the wife of Narsimha Chary who during his train journey on 12.7.2004 at about 11.40 hours died as a result of blast in the train. A case was registered in Cr.No.110/2004 by the Railway Police, Wadi. The appellant made a claim to the respondent on 1.3.2005 for payment of the claim amount and the respondent repudiated the claim on 9.9.2005 on the ground that the appellant did not make claim intimation within the stipulated period 30 days and the claim submission with supporting documents within period of 90 days. The appellant being illiterate had no knowledge about the insurance policy issued covering the risk due to accident on her deceased husband till her relatives handed over the policy paper to the appellant. The appellant filed writ petition in High Court of Andhra Pradesh in W.P.No.24448 of 2005 wherein the High Court directed the respondent to pay the claim amount to ...
Tag this Judgment!M/S. Dhaatri Constructions Pvt Ltd., Rep. by Its Director Mv Mallkharj ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Sep-30-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Member) 1. The opposite parties are the appellants. The respondents filed the complaint stating that they paid an amount of Rs.7,87,500/- towards initial payment on 8.06.2007 and entered into agreement of sale for purchasing flat in the venture floated by the first appellant-company at Bandlaguda Jagir village. The appellants promised the respondent that they would carry out the development work in the land as per the norms of HUDA and they failed to carry out the development work and on demand made by the respondent the appellants agreed to refund the amount received from the respondent which they failed to do as a result of which the respondent got issued notice on 25.03.2010 and as there was no response thereto, the respondent filed complaint claiming refund of the amount. 2. The appellants resisted the claim on the premise that they entered into agreement with the respondents to sell Flat for a consideration of Rs.31,50,000/- on 8.06.2007 and t...
Tag this Judgment!T. Chinna Laxmanna Vs. Balaji Traders, Rep. Through Its Partners and A ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Sep-30-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Member) 1. The complainant is the appellant. Being dissatisfied with the award for return of the sum of Rs.7,350/- with interest thereon, he filed the appeal contending that the order of the District Forum is contrary to law and probabilities of the case. It is contended that the relief for refund of the amount granted by the District Forum is unreasonable and that the respondents enjoyed themselves with the amount paid by him for long stretch of time and that the District Forum failed to consider the present market value of the plot and that the District Forum failed to consider that no particular plot was allotted to the appellant. It is contended that no prejudice would be caused to the respondents if plot of similar size is registered in his favour and that the District Forum failed to consider that the respondents are in possession of other plots in the same venture till date. 2. The facts of the case as seen from the complaint are that the ap...
Tag this Judgment!Tummuri Jalandhari Vs. the Government of A.P., Rep. by Its Prin
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-30-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU W.A.No.1305 of 2013 and BATCH3009-2013 Tummuri Jalandhari..... APPELLANT The Government of A.P., rep. by its Principal Secretary,Health Medical and Family Welfare Department,Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabadand others.....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the petitioners : Sri G.Simhadri Counsel for respondent No.1 : Government Pleader for Health Medical and Family Welfare Department Counsel for respondent No.2 : Sri A.Prabhakar Rao Counsel for respondent No.3 : Sri Challa Gunaranjan Counsel for respondent No.5 : Sri Ch.Pushyam Kiran : ?.Cases referred:1. 2013(8) SCC992. (2005) 6 SCC5363. (2002) 8 SCC4814. (2003) 6 SCC6975. (1992) 3 SCC6666. (1993) 1 SCC645THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ASHUTOSH MOHUNTA AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU W.A.No.1305 of 2013 and W.P.Nos.22553, 22561, 22542, 23005, 23255, 23267, 23394, 23406, 23407, 23412, 23452, 23490, 23494, 23502, 22602, 22617, 22622, 23632, 22699, 227...
Tag this Judgment!T.Mallikarjuna and Three Oth Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh,represent ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-30-2013
HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.No.5312 of 2013 30-09-2013 T.Mallikarjuna and three others.Petitioners The State of Andhra Pradesh,Represented by its District Collector,Chittoor District, Chittoor and eight others .Respondents Counsel for petitioneRs.Sr.P.S.Rajasekhar Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 4 and 7 : Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue Counsel for respondent Nos.5, 8 and 9 : None appeared Counsel for respondent No.6 : Sr.Sitaram Chaparla ?.CASES REFERRED: Nil HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.No.5312 of 2013 Dated:30.09.2013 The Court made the following : ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to set-aside proceedings in Roc.No.B/985/2011, dated 06.10.2012, of respondent No.4 and proceedings, dated 18-3-2012, changing the entry in 1-B Register maintained under the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Passbooks Act, 1971 (for short ".the Act".).in respect of Acs.2-81 cents of land in Survey No.142/2 of Boduma...
Tag this Judgment!The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner Bhavishya Nidhi Bhavan, Barka ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Sep-27-2013
Smt. M. Shreesha, Incharge President These appeals are disposed of by this common order since the facts are similar in all these matters. F.A.No.721/2013 Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.152/2012 on the file of District Forum, Guntur the opposite parties preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant worked as a cleaner in APSRTC Repalle Guntur District and opted for Employees Pension Scheme, 1995. The complainant had put 23 years of part service upto 15-11-1995 and thereafter 13 years of service totalling to 36 years service. The complainant submits that his details regarding service particulars as follows: P.F.A/c.No. AP/Hyd/295/43285 Date of Birth 02-6-1950 Part Service Upto 15-11-1995 23 years Actual service 13 years Total service 36 years Age as on 15-11-95 45 years The wage on 15-11-1995 Rs.3920/- Pensionable Salary Rs12,940/- Basing on the above information, the complainant submits that the opposite parties wrongly fixed hi...
Tag this Judgment!M/S.Kalyanroller Floor Mills Pvt. Ltd., Vs. 1. U. NeelammA.2. U.Uma Se ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-27-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No.302 of 2003 Dated :27-09-2013 M/S.Kalyan Roller Floor Mills Pvt. Ltd., Rep. by its Managing Director, S.Jagadesh Gupta..... Appellant 1. U. Neelamma.2. u.Uma Sekhar 3. U.Vinod Kumar 4. P. Veeranarayana, ..... Respondents Counsel for the Appellant: MR. CHALLA GUNARANJAN Counsel for the Respondents: MR. MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEM GIST : HEAD NOTE : ?.Cases referred :1. (1996) 6 SCC12. 1999 LLR1643. 1995 LLR10244. 1999 (6) ALD1015. 2013 (2) ALD61(SC) 6. 2004 (1) LLJ49The Court made the following: JUDGMENT: This appeal is preferred by the respondent in W.C.No.3 of 2001 aggrieved by the award dated 04.12.2002 passed by the Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation and Assistant Commissioner of Labour, Anantapur.2. The aforesaid compensation case was filed claiming that the first claimant is the widow and claimants 2 and 3 are the minor sons of the deceased, U. Ramanjaneyulu. The deceased is said to be working with the appel...
Tag this Judgment!Chalapathi Chit Fund (P) Ltd., Ongo Vs. B.Rajasekhar and Othe
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-27-2013
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.658 of 2011 DT.27-09-2013 Chalapathi Chit Fund (P) Ltd., Ongole ...Petitioner B.Rajasekhar and others..Respondents ^Counsel for the Petitioner: Sr.P.Durga Prasad !Counsel for the respondents: --- Head note: ?.Cases referred: 1. (1993) 1 SCC (Supp.) 693 2. 2006 (2) ALT6323. 2012 (3) ALT758THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Civil Revision Petition No.658 of 2011 The Court made the following: ORDER: This civil revision petition arises out of order, dated 18.01.2011, in E.P.No.15 of 2008 in O.S.No.255 of 2006, on the file of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Kandukur. The petitioner is the decree holder in the above-mentioned suit. It has filed E.P.No.15 of 2008 seeking arrest of respondent Nos.2 and 3 for non-payment of the EP amount. The lower Court dismissed the EP mainly on the ground that respondent Nos.2 and 3 being Government servants, the EP is not maintainable without taking recouRs.to recovery of the decr...
Tag this Judgment!Commissioner of Income Tax, AP-i, Hydera Vs. Trustees of HEH the Nizam ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-27-2013
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU R.C.No.53 of 1993 Date 27-09-2013 Commissioner of Income Tax, AP-I, Hyderabad..... Applicant And Trustees of HEH the Nizam's Mukarramjah Trust for Education & Learnings, Hyderabad..... Respondent !Counsel for the Applicant: S.R. Ashok, Standing Counsel Counsel for the Respondent: Sri S. Ravi : : ?.Cases Referred:1. [1984]. 150 ITR508(Andhra Pradesh) 2. [1987]. 166 ITR580(Madhya Pradesh) 3. [1987]. 163 ITR129(Madras) ORDER: (Per Hon'ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) This case has been referred under Section 256 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'said Act') by the learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad, on the application made by the Revenue by order dated 06-01-1993 for the opinion of this Court on the following questions:1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the ITAT is justified in setting aside the orders passed by the CIT, ...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »