Andhra Pradesh Court September 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Narra Sushe Vs. Narra Srinivas Re
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-13-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L .NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE S.V.BHATT C.M.A.No.2943 of 1999 (Judgment of the Bench delivered by the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) dated:13-09-2013 Narra Susheela ..appellant Narra Srinivas Reddy ..Respondent Counsel for the appellant: Sr.M. Raja Malla Reddy Counsel for the Respondent : Sr.P. Venugopal Kumar HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE S.V.BHATT C.M.A.No.2943 of 1999 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) The respondent in O.P.No.78 of 1997 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Siddipet, filed this appeal under Section 28 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short 'the Act').The O.P was filed by the respondent herein under Section 13(1) (ia) and (ib) of the Act, for divorce against the appellant. The trial Court allowed the OP and dissolved the marriage between the parties through its order and decree dated 19-04-1999. The respondent is the husband o...
Meka Karthik and Others Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Its Pub
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-13-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.12956 of 2010 dated:13-09-2013 Meka Karthik and others..... Petitioners State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad and another.....Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: Sri Nimmagadda Satyanarayana Counsel for respondent No.1 : Public Prosecutor : ?.Cases referred:1. 1999 CRI. L.J.3450 2.1991 CRI. L.J.3144(1) 3.AIR1964Supreme Court 1541 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. KANTHA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.12956 of 2010 ORDER : This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by the petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 3 in Crime No.24 of 2010 of Chirala I Town Police Station to quash the entire proceedings in P.R.C.No.46 of 2010 on the file of the Additional Judicial Magistrate of the First Class, Chirala, against them.2. I have heard Sri Bal Reddy, learned senior counsel, representing Sri Nimmagadda Satyanarayana, learned counsel for the petitioners-A.1 to A.3 and t...
K. Padmanabhaiah S/O. Late K. Janakirama Vs. Government of Andhra Prad ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-12-2013
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C.BHANU P.I.L.Nos.28 of 2013 and Batch 12-09-2013 K. Padmanabhaiah S/o. Late K. Janakiramaiah,Aged about 74 years, Hyderabad and others........ Petitioners Government of Andhra Pradesh, GAD,Secretariat, Hyderabad, rep. By its Principal Secretary and others.......... Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: Sri G. Mohan Rao Counsel for respondent No.1: Sri N. Sreedhar Reddy Counsel for respondent No.2: Smt. Ch. Vedavani Counsel for respondent Nos.3 to 6: Sri D.V. Seetharama Murthy, Senior Counsel, for Sri N. Ashwani Kumar : Cases Referred:2013. (1) SCC 74.P.I.L.Nos.28 and 38 of 2013 COMMON ORDER: (Per Hon'ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) Both the Public Interest Litigations have been filed seeking issuance of writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the selection and appointment of respondent nos.3 to 6 as State Information Commissioners to the second respondent Commission as ar...
Mangali Shankaraiah Vs. Pragathi Seeds Centre, Dealers in Quality Seed ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Sep-12-2013
Oral Order: (T. Ashok Kumar, Member) 1. This is an appeal preferred by the unsuccessful complainant as against the orders dated 28.11.2011 in CC 170/2009 on the file of the District Consumer Forum, Ranga Reddy District. For convenience sake, the parties as arrayed in the complaint are referred to as under : 2. The brief facts of the complaint are that the complainant who is an agriculturist had purchased 5 packets of hybrid Tomato NS-566 Namdhari seeds lot no. RO 704-46-01, DOT 16/09-2008 DOP 18/12/2008 valid up to 15.06.2009 from OP. 1 dealer, manufactured by OP. 2 by paying Rs.1,200/-. He showed the said seeds in his land situated in Kallakal village within the stipulated time as shown in the bill. After germination, he got plucked up the young plants and transplanted 9,600 plants maintaining the distance in the said land in an extent of half acre out of one acre situated in the limits of the said village. He used required fertilizers , manures, pesticides to ensure the proper growth...
L.i.C. of India, Rep. by Its Branch Manager and Another Vs. Vikram Ven ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Sep-12-2013
Oral Order: (S. Bhujanga Rao, Member) The appellants/opp.parties filed the appeal, against the order dt.04.07.2012 of the District Forum, Srikakulam made in C.C.No.7/2012. For the sake of convenience, the parties are described as arrayed in the complaint. The case of the complainant as set out in the complaint in brief is as follows: The complainant insured his life under Jeevan Surabhi Policy and it was revived under special revived scheme under the table and term 106/15. The said Jeevan Surabhi Policy covers accidental benefits. The complainant met with an accident on 27.11.2002 and in the said accident, his right leg was amputated and the Medical Board has issued Disability Certificate at 90% in favour of the complainant. As per the said Jeevan Surabhi Policy, if the insured has met with an accident, he need not pay the future instalments, from the date of the accident, till the date of maturity and also he is entitled, for disability benefits inclusive of accidental risks. However,...
K. Anantha Rao S/O. K. Sriranga Rao Aged Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh R ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-12-2013
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU W.P.No.8933 of 2013 DATED:12-09-2013 K. Anantha Rao S/o. K. Sriranga Rao Aged about 57 years, Occ: Advocate,R/o. Malakpet, Hyderabad........ Petitioner State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Chief Secretary,Secretariat, Hyderabad, and others......... Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr. Vedula Srinivas Counsel for Respondents: G.P. For Revenue : : ?.Cases referred:1. AIR1964SC12842. AIR1972SC17383. (2011) 8 SCC7084. (2002) 8 SCC1825. AIR1956SC6766. AIR1966Calcutta 359 HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTI SENGUPTA AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.C. BHANU W.P.No.8933 of 2013 ORDER: (Per Hon'ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) By this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the constitutional validity of Section 6-D of the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). The petitioner is the owner and possessor of the agricult...
Pyla Anand Rao and Anot Vs. the Tahsildar, Visakhapatnam and Other
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-11-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.24406 of 2013 dated:11-09-2013 Pyla Anand Rao and another.Petitioners The Tahsildar, Visakhapatnam and others .Respondents Counsel for the PetitioneRs.Sr.P.Satyanarayana Counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2: Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue : : ?.Cases referred: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a mandamus to set aside the proceedings in Rc.No.523/2013/A dated 10.07.2013 of respondent No.1, based on which respondent No.3 has registered F.I.R.No.314/2013 dated 13.07.2013 for the offences punishable under Sections 447, 427 read with Section 34 I.P.C.The petitioners are the owners of plot Nos.4 and 5 admeasuring 249.6 sq. yards and 247.27 sq. yards respectively in survey No.176/13 of Madhurawada Village, Visakhapatnam (Rural) Mandal and District. The petitioners obtained building permission from the Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation on 11.04.2011 and constructed an apartment building with stilt, ground and th...
The District Collector , Adilabad and Ot Vs. R.Swathi and Anot
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-11-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE S.V.BHATT,J WRIT PETITION No.26274 of 2013 dated:11-09-2013 The District Collector , Adilabad and others ....PETITIONER R.Swathi and Another ..RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioners:G.P.for Services-II Counsel for the 1st Respondent :Sr.P.Veerabhadra Reddy ?.Cases Referred: AIR1969Supreme Court 267 ORDER: (per the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) This writ petition is filed by the Government of Andhra Pradesh in Revenue Department feeling aggrieved by the order, dated 08.03.2013, in O.A.No.3851 of 2012 on the file of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, H Hyderabad. The O.A.was filed by the 1st respondent against the order passed by the 1st petitioner refusing to issue an order of appointment for the post of Village Revenue Officer (V.R.O.) The recruitment to the post of V.R.O.in Adilabad District was taken up by publishing a notification on 07.12.2011. The 1st respondent, who is a visually disabled perso...
Pittala Lachav Vs. Deddeti Venkataiah and Two Oth
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-11-2013
THE HON'BLE Ms JUSTICE G. ROHINI AND THE HON'BL Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM L.A.A.S.(S.R.) No.10456 of 2013 dated:11-09-2013 Pittala Lachavva .Appellant Deddeti Venkataiah and two others.Respondents Counsel for the appellant : Sr.M. Rajamalla Reddy Counsel for the respondents: -- : : ?.Citations: 1. AIR1929Madras 223 2. 2006 (3) ALD199(DB) THE HON'BLE Ms JUSTICE G. ROHINI AND THE HON'BL Sr.JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM L.A.A.S.(S.R.) No.10456 of 2013 ORDER: (Per RG,J.The matter is listed before us for orders on the following objections raised by the office: 1) Please mention correct provision of law in the grounds copy and wherever necessary. 2) Please pay the deficient court fee, if any. 3) Please clarify and state as to how this appeal is entertainable under Section 54 of LA Act against decree and Judgment dated 22.04.2013 in LAOP No.35 of 2010 in view of judgment of Division Bench i.e.2006(3) ALD199DB).The said LAOP was filed under Section 30 of LA Act. We have heard the learned coun...
Dy.Y.Se Vs. Dr.i. Poornachandra Rao, Paathrudu and O
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Sep-10-2013
THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L .NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE S.V.BHATT Writ Petition No.19469 of 2013 (Judgment of the Bench delivered by the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) Dated:10-09-2013 Dy.Y.Sekhar..petitioner Dr.I.Poornachandra Rao, Paathrudu and others..Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sr.B. Sesi Bushan Rao Counsel for the Respondents: Sr.G. Vidyasagar, for R-1 GP for Services-I for RRs 2 to 7 HEAD NOTE: ?.Cases referred THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE Sr.JUSTICE S.V.BHATT Writ Petition No.19469 of 2013 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble Sr.Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) The 1st respondent is working as Clinical Registrar (Teaching Faculty) in the Nizamia Tibbi (Unani Medical) College, Charminar, Hyderabad. The petitioner is working as Regional Deputy Director (Ayush) at Ongole. In the year 2010, he was working as Superintendent in the Unani Hospital, Hyderabad. An altercation took place between the petitioner and the 1st respondent, and both...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »