Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: rakesh kumar · Page 1 of about 7,493 results (0.545 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 29 2004

Ram Kumar Gupta Vs. A.D.J. (E.C. Act) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-29-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : Rent Control Act; Transfer of Property Act; Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : 2005(2)AWC2375

Advocate for Appellant : Rakesh Kumar Srivastava, Adv.

A.N. Varma, J.1. Through the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for quashing of the judgment and orders dated 29.9.2004 as well as 24.5.2001 passed by opposite parties...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 26 2004

Nelco (India) (P) Ltd. Vs. Cit

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Aug-26-2004

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2005)193CTR(All)257; [2005]142TAXMAN380(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Rakesh Kumar for the Assessee Ashok Kumar for the Revenue.

ORDERThe Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi, has referred the following question of law under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) for opinion to this court:'Whether, on the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 27 2004

Ganesh Bartan Bhandar Vs. Income-tax Settlement Commission

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-27-2004

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2005]144TAXMAN307(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Rakesh Kumar, for the Assessee A.N. Mahajan, for the Revenue.

ORDERR.K. Agrawal, J. By means of the present writ petition filed under article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners seek a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order dated...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 17 2004

Chater SaIn Vs. Cit

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-17-2004

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : [2005]144TAXMAN828(All)

Advocate for Appellant : Rakesh Kumar, for the Assessee A.N. Mahajan, for the revenue.

R.K. Agrawal, J. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi, has referred the following question of law under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') for opinion to this Court:'Whether...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 28 2012

Om Kr. Dhankar Vs. State of Haryana and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-28-2012

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 420, 406, 161, 409 427; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Section 13(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.) 1973 - Section 197,

 R.M. LODHA, J.1. Leave granted.2. The complainant is in appeal, by special leave, aggrieved by the order dated May 17, 2007 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana whereby the single Judge of that Court...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 21 2002

Mary Rasul Vs. Isahak Ali

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Mar-21-2002

Subject : Election

Acts : Election Law; Representation of People Act, 1951 - Sections 33(6); Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968 - Order 13A; General Clauses Act; Constitution of India - Article 324

Advocate for Appellant : A.B. Choudhury, J. Abedin and M. Mahanta, Advs.

Ranjan Gogoi, J. 1. By means of the present election petition, the petitioner has called into question the election of the respondent No. 1 to the Assam Legislative Assembly from the No. 44, Jania Legislative Assembly...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 09 2009

Tika Ram and ors. Etc. Etc. Vs. State of U.P. and ors. Etc. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-09-2009

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1A), 3A, 3(3A)(3), 3B, 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5, 5A, 5(4), 6, 6(1), 6(2), 7, 8, 9, 9(1), 11, 11A, 17, 17(1), 17(1A), 17(2), 17(3), 17(3A), 17(4), 17(4A), 18, 23(1A), 34 and 48; Land Acquisition (Uttar Pradesh Amendment and Validation) Act, 1991 - Sections 1, 2, 2(4), 3 and 4; Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984; Rajasthan Urban Improvement Act, 1987; Taxation on Income (Investigation Commission) Act, 1947; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 21, 39, 48, 48A, 141, 226, 245, 246, 254(2), 254(3) and 300A; Land Acquisition (Uttar Pradesh Amendment and Validation) Ordinance, 1990

Reported in : JT2009(12)SC1; 2009(12)SCALE349; (2009)10SCC689:2009AIRSCW6465

Advocate for Appellant : R.N. Trivedi,; Rakesh Kr. Dwivedi,; Dinesh Dwivedi, Sr.

V.S. Sirpurkar, J.Background of Appeals1. This judgment will dispose of Civil Appeal Nos. 2650-2652 of 1998, 3162 of 1998, 3176 of 1998, 3415 of 1998, 3561 of 1998, 3597 of 1998, 3923 of 1998, 3939 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 06 2001

Hindustan Ferro and Industries Ltd. and anr. Vs. Debt Recovery Tribuna ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-06-2001

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Recovery of Debt to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Sections 18, 19 and 20

Reported in : [2003]113CompCas58(All); (2001)2UPLBEC1088

Advocate for Appellant : R.N. Singh, ;A.K. Kalara and ;Prakesh Kumar, Advs.

ORDERO.P. Garg, J.1. The woodcut profile of the case of the petitioner No. 1, a company duly registered under the Companies Act, carrying on the business of manufacturing Ferro Silicon and of which the petitioner No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 30 2008

Karan Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-30-2008

Subject : Service

Reported in : RLW2008(4)Raj3329

Gopal Krishan Vyas, J.1. In this case, the petitioner has prayed for direction to the respondents to grant pension w.e.f. 1.2.1979 and pay him all consequential benefits along with interest @ 18% per annum.2. As per...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 26 2011

Ajay Kumar Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : May-26-2011

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 341, 323, 324, 326/34

1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner Ajay Kumar has been made accused for the offence under Section 341, 323, 324, 326 / 34 of the Indian Penal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial