Ajay Kumar Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Ajay Kumar vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided May 26, 2011

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/917761

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/917761
Court: Jharkhand High Court
Judge: H. C. Mishra, J.
Decided On: May 26, 2011
Case Number: B.A. No.1302 of 2011
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

[H. C. Mishra] – Indian Penal Code – Section 341 -- Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. In the FIR, there is overt act of assault alleged against this petitioner and it is also alleged that the petitioner had bitten the ear-pinna of one Rakesh Kumar due to whic...

Key legal issue: Criminal
Acts & sections: Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 341, 323, 324, 326/34

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ajay Kumar

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Legal References

Acts: Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 341, 323, 324, 326/34

Excerpt

[h. c. mishra] - indian penal code - section 341 -- heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the state. in the fir, there is overt act of assault alleged against this petitioner and it is also alleged that the petitioner had bitten the ear-pinna of one rakesh kumar due to which the ear-pinna was severed. learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. in the aforesaid facts and circumstances, i am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. accordingly, the petitioner ajay kumar is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of chief judicial magistrate, giridih, in connection nimiaghat p.s. case no.88/2010, corresponding to g.r. no.2651 of 2010. 1. heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the state. petitioner ajay kumar has been made accused for the offence under section 341, 323, 324, 326 / 34 of the indian penal code in connection with nimiaghat p.s. case no.88/2010, corresponding to g.r. no.2651 of 2010 which was instituted on the basis of the written report given by the one sumitra devi. in the fir, there is overt act of assault alleged against this petitioner and it is also alleged that the petitioner had bitten the ear-pinna of one rakesh kumar due to which the ear-pinna was severed. learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. it is also stated that the co-accused has already been granted bail. 2. in the aforesaid facts and circumstances, i am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. accordingly, the petitioner ajay kumar is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of chief judicial magistrate, giridih, in connection nimiaghat p.s. case no.88/2010, corresponding to g.r. no.2651 of 2010.

Full Judgment

1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner Ajay Kumar has been made accused for the offence under Section 341, 323, 324, 326 / 34 of the Indian Penal Code in connection with Nimiaghat P.S. Case no.88/2010, corresponding to G.R. No.2651 of 2010 which was instituted on the basis of the written report given by the one Sumitra Devi. In the FIR, there is overt act of assault alleged against this petitioner and it is also alleged that the petitioner had bitten the ear-pinna of one Rakesh Kumar due to which the ear-pinna was severed. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. It is also stated that the co-accused has already been granted bail.

2. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner Ajay Kumar is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Giridih, in connection Nimiaghat P.S. Case no.88/2010, corresponding to G.R. No.2651 of 2010.

Same Court & Year Jharkhand · 2011 Same Parties Ajay Kumar vs The State of Jharkhand Same Subject Criminal Same Judge H. C. Mishra, J. Acts & Sections Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 341, 323, 324, 326/34

Criminal