Advanced Search Results

A. Kamal Batcha Vs. Assistant Director, Enforcement Directorate

Court : Chennai

Subject : FERA

Reported in : 1987(13)ECC135

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Santhanam

Maheswaran, J.1. This appeal by one Kamal Batcha is preferred against the order of Foreign Exchange Regulation Appellate Board (Southern Zone), finding him guilty under Sections 5(1)(aa) and 5(1)(c) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947...

Patwari Forgings Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Subject : Service Tax

Reported in : (2008)10STR52

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Santhanam

1. The Ld. Counsel Mr. Santhanam appearing for the appellants submitted that the demand framed by the ld. Appellate Authority at page 11 in the impugned order is as under: In the instant case the main...

A.R. Deivasigamani Mudaliar Vs. T.N. Somasundaram Nadar

Court : Chennai

Subject : Family

Reported in : (1997)2MLJ353

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. Santhanam

K. Govindarajan, J.1. The plaintiff who failed before the trial court is the appellant in the above appeal. The second defendant is the father of the plaintiff and the third defendant is the mother of the...

S.P. Gupta Vs. President of India and ors. Overruled

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 32, 74, 74(1), 74(2), 124, , 136, 139A, 163, 216, 217, 217(1), 217(2), 218, 221(1), 222, 224, 224(1) 226, 233(1), 234 and 368; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 166; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 133, 162 and 162(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 91 and 92 - Order 17, Rule 2 - Order 31, Rule 19A; Evidence Act - Sections 114, 123, 124, 132, 162 and 162(1); Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 220; Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968

Reported in : AIR1982SC149; 1981Supp(1)SCC87; [1982]2SCR365

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. H.M. Seervai

P.N. Bhagwati, J.1. These writ petitions filed in different High Courts and transferred to this Court under Article 139 of the Constitution raise issues of great constitutional importance affecting the independence of the judiciary and they...

Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru and ors.Vs. State of Kerala and anr ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 1, 2, 3, 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 13(1), 13(2), 13(3), 13(3), 13(3), 13(4), 14, 15, 15(1), 15(3), 15(4), 16, 16(2), 16(3), 16(4), 16(5), 17, 18, 19, 19(1), 19(1)(f), 19(2), 19(5), 19(6), 19(6), 20, 20(2), 21, 22, 22(1), 22(2), 22(3), 22(4), 23, 24, 25, 25(1), 25(2), 26, 26, 26, 27, 28, 29, 29(1), 29(2), 30, 30(1), 30(2), 31, 31, 31, 31(1), 31(2), 31(2A), 31(2B), 31(3), 31(4), 31(5), 31(5), 31(6), 31A, 31A(1), 31A(2), 31B, 31C, 32, 32(1), 32(2), 32(4), 33, 34, 35, 35, 37, 38, 39, 39(B), 39, 39, 39(C), 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 46(1), 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 56(1), 59, 60, 61, 61(1), 62, 64, 66, 68, 69, 72, 73, 73(1), 73(2), 74, 75, 75(1), 75(4), 76, 76(2), 77(2), 79, 83, 83(2), 85, 85(1), 88, 89, 100, 102(1), 103(1), 103(3)

Reported in : AIR1973SC1461; (1973)4SCC225; [1973]SuppSCR1

1. I propose to divide my judgment into eight parts. Part I will deal with Introduction; Part II with interpretation of Golakhnath case; Part III with the interpretation of the original Article 368, as it existed...

R. Nallusamy Vs. Union of India Rep. by Director Department of Telecom ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2003)3MLJ215

Advocate for Appellant : R. Ramesh, Adv.

ORDERV.S. Sirpurkar, J.1. The Central Administrative Tribunal's order dismissing the original application filed by the petitioner herein is in challenge. While disposing of the original application, the tribunal relied on the order passed by it earlier...

M/S.Integrated Finance Company Ltd vs the State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH TUESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JULY 2024 / 8TH SRAVANA, 1946 WP(C) NO. 4357 OF 2014 PETITIONER: M/S.INTEGRATED FINANCE COMPANY LTD R-10...

D. Rajagopal Vs. Tamil Nadu Small Industries Development Corporation L ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Companies Act; Service Rules - Rules 3 and 10(2)

Reported in : [1987(54)FLR194]; (1986)IILLJ425Mad

ORDER1. Petitioner seeks for a declaration that R. 3. 10(2) of the Service Rules of respondent-Corporation, is illegal. 2. Already, dealing with the points arising in W.P. 2976 of 1985, it has been held that the...

In Re: Palani Moopan

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 164, 288, 364 and 533; Madras High Court Criminal Practice Rules - Rule 85; Constitution of India - Article 20 and 20(3); Evidence Act - Sections 145

Reported in : AIR1955Mad495; 1955CriLJ1197; (1953)2MLJ199

Advocate for Appellant : P.S. Kailasam, Adv.;R. Santhanam, Adv. for ;Public Prosecutor

Basheer Ahmed Sayeed, J.1. Palani Moopan, aged about 24, has been found guilty of murder of his wife, Karuppayee, aged about 20, on 26-1-19.54 at Kuppandampalayam, by inflicting injuries with a tapper's knife and has been...

In Re: Ambalathil Assainar

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1956CriLJ244

Mack, J. 1. The appellant, a Mopla, has been found guilty under Section 302, I.P.C. of the murder of his wife, Pathu, aged 25, on 20-8-1954 sometime between 9-30 p.m. and 11-45 p.m., and sentenced to...