Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Plaintiff: mr santhanam · Page 1 of about 40 results (0.078 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 30 1981

S.P. Gupta Vs. President of India and ors. Overruled

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-30-1981

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 32, 74, 74(1), 74(2), 124, , 136, 139A, 163, 216, 217, 217(1), 217(2), 218, 221(1), 222, 224, 224(1) 226, 233(1), 234 and 368; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 166; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 133, 162 and 162(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 91 and 92 - Order 17, Rule 2 - Order 31, Rule 19A; Evidence Act - Sections 114, 123, 124, 132, 162 and 162(1); Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 220; Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968

Reported in : AIR1982SC149; 1981Supp(1)SCC87; [1982]2SCR365

Advocate for Appellant : Shri. H.M. Seervai

P.N. Bhagwati, J.1. These writ petitions filed in different High Courts and transferred to this Court under Article 139 of the Constitution raise issues of great constitutional importance affecting the independence of the judiciary and they...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 24 1973

Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru and ors.Vs. State of Kerala and anr ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-24-1973

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 1, 2, 3, 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 13(1), 13(2), 13(3), 13(3), 13(3), 13(4), 14, 15, 15(1), 15(3), 15(4), 16, 16(2), 16(3), 16(4), 16(5), 17, 18, 19, 19(1), 19(1)(f), 19(2), 19(5), 19(6), 19(6), 20, 20(2), 21, 22, 22(1), 22(2), 22(3), 22(4), 23, 24, 25, 25(1), 25(2), 26, 26, 26, 27, 28, 29, 29(1), 29(2), 30, 30(1), 30(2), 31, 31, 31, 31(1), 31(2), 31(2A), 31(2B), 31(3), 31(4), 31(5), 31(5), 31(6), 31A, 31A(1), 31A(2), 31B, 31C, 32, 32(1), 32(2), 32(4), 33, 34, 35, 35, 37, 38, 39, 39(B), 39, 39, 39(C), 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 46(1), 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 56(1), 59, 60, 61, 61(1), 62, 64, 66, 68, 69, 72, 73, 73(1), 73(2), 74, 75, 75(1), 75(4), 76, 76(2), 77(2), 79, 83, 83(2), 85, 85(1), 88, 89, 100, 102(1), 103(1), 103(3)

Reported in : AIR1973SC1461; (1973)4SCC225; [1973]SuppSCR1

1. I propose to divide my judgment into eight parts. Part I will deal with Introduction; Part II with interpretation of Golakhnath case; Part III with the interpretation of the original Article 368, as it existed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 30 2024

M/S.Integrated Finance Company Ltd vs the State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jul-30-2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH TUESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JULY 2024 / 8TH SRAVANA, 1946 WP(C) NO. 4357 OF 2014 PETITIONER: M/S.INTEGRATED FINANCE COMPANY LTD R-10...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 14 2003

R. Nallusamy Vs. Union of India Rep. by Director Department of Telecom ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-14-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : (2003)3MLJ215

Advocate for Appellant : R. Ramesh, Adv.

ORDERV.S. Sirpurkar, J.1. The Central Administrative Tribunal's order dismissing the original application filed by the petitioner herein is in challenge. While disposing of the original application, the tribunal relied on the order passed by it earlier...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 21 1986

D. Rajagopal Vs. Tamil Nadu Small Industries Development Corporation L ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-21-1986

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Companies Act; Service Rules - Rules 3 and 10(2)

Reported in : [1987(54)FLR194]; (1986)IILLJ425Mad

ORDER1. Petitioner seeks for a declaration that R. 3. 10(2) of the Service Rules of respondent-Corporation, is illegal. 2. Already, dealing with the points arising in W.P. 2976 of 1985, it has been held that the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 11 1960

Nallakaruppan Chettiar Vs. Subbiah thevar

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Feb-11-1960

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Cattle Trespass Act - Sections 10 and 24; Madras Forest Act - Sections 26 and 32; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 355

Reported in : AIR1960Mad331; 1960CriLJ932; (1960)IIMLJ455

ORDER(1) This is a revision preferred against the conviction and sentence by the learned Sub-Magistrate of Tirumayam in C. C. No. 37 of 1959, confirmed by the learned District Magistrate of Tiruchirapalli, in C. A. No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 01 1955

In Re: Palani Moopan

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-01-1955

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 164, 288, 364 and 533; Madras High Court Criminal Practice Rules - Rule 85; Constitution of India - Article 20 and 20(3); Evidence Act - Sections 145

Reported in : AIR1955Mad495; 1955CriLJ1197; (1953)2MLJ199

Advocate for Appellant : P.S. Kailasam, Adv.;R. Santhanam, Adv. for ;Public Prosecutor

Basheer Ahmed Sayeed, J.1. Palani Moopan, aged about 24, has been found guilty of murder of his wife, Karuppayee, aged about 20, on 26-1-19.54 at Kuppandampalayam, by inflicting injuries with a tapper's knife and has been...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 19 1955

In Re: Ambalathil Assainar

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-19-1955

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1956CriLJ244

Mack, J. 1. The appellant, a Mopla, has been found guilty under Section 302, I.P.C. of the murder of his wife, Pathu, aged 25, on 20-8-1954 sometime between 9-30 p.m. and 11-45 p.m., and sentenced to...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 21 2014

Pacific India Trade Concern Vs. Commissioner of Customs (Prev)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-21-2014

Subject : MRTP

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. R. Santhanam, Mr. A. P. Sinha

$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:21. 02.2014 + CUSAA62014 PACIFIC INDIA TRADE CONCERN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. R. Santhanam with Mr. A. P. Sinha, Advocates. versus COMMISSIONER OF...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 25 2003

Finquick Finance (P.) Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on : Aug-25-2003

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2003)87ITD323(Delhi)

1. In this appeal, the assessee has objected to the order of the CIT(A) dated 31-1-2001 by way of following grounds : 1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the impugned orders...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial