Advanced Search Results
S.P. Gupta Vs. President of India and ors. Overruled
Supreme Court of India
Dec-30-1981
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 32, 74, 74(1), 74(2), 124, , 136, 139A, 163, 216, 217, 217(1), 217(2), 218, 221(1), 222, 224, 224(1) 226, 233(1), 234 and 368; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 166; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 133, 162 and 162(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 91 and 92 - Order 17, Rule 2 - Order 31, Rule 19A; Evidence Act - Sections 114, 123, 124, 132, 162 and 162(1); Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 220; Judges (Inquiry) Act, 1968
AIR1982SC149; 1981Supp(1)SCC87; [1982]2SCR365
Shri. H.M. Seervai
P.N. Bhagwati, J.1. These writ petitions filed in different High Courts and transferred to this Court under Article 139 of the Constitution raise issues of great constitutional importance affecting the independence of the judiciary and they...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskKesavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru and ors.Vs. State of Kerala and anr ...
Supreme Court of India
Apr-24-1973
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 1, 2, 3, 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 13(1), 13(2), 13(3), 13(3), 13(3), 13(4), 14, 15, 15(1), 15(3), 15(4), 16, 16(2), 16(3), 16(4), 16(5), 17, 18, 19, 19(1), 19(1)(f), 19(2), 19(5), 19(6), 19(6), 20, 20(2), 21, 22, 22(1), 22(2), 22(3), 22(4), 23, 24, 25, 25(1), 25(2), 26, 26, 26, 27, 28, 29, 29(1), 29(2), 30, 30(1), 30(2), 31, 31, 31, 31(1), 31(2), 31(2A), 31(2B), 31(3), 31(4), 31(5), 31(5), 31(6), 31A, 31A(1), 31A(2), 31B, 31C, 32, 32(1), 32(2), 32(4), 33, 34, 35, 35, 37, 38, 39, 39(B), 39, 39, 39(C), 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 46(1), 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 56(1), 59, 60, 61, 61(1), 62, 64, 66, 68, 69, 72, 73, 73(1), 73(2), 74, 75, 75(1), 75(4), 76, 76(2), 77(2), 79, 83, 83(2), 85, 85(1), 88, 89, 100, 102(1), 103(1), 103(3)
AIR1973SC1461; (1973)4SCC225; [1973]SuppSCR1
1. I propose to divide my judgment into eight parts. Part I will deal with Introduction; Part II with interpretation of Golakhnath case; Part III with the interpretation of the original Article 368, as it existed...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S.Integrated Finance Company Ltd vs the State of Kerala
Kerala
Jul-30-2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH TUESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JULY 2024 / 8TH SRAVANA, 1946 WP(C) NO. 4357 OF 2014 PETITIONER: M/S.INTEGRATED FINANCE COMPANY LTD R-10...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
R. Nallusamy Vs. Union of India Rep. by Director Department of Telecom ...
Chennai
Jul-14-2003
Service
Constitution of India - Article 226
(2003)3MLJ215
R. Ramesh, Adv.
ORDERV.S. Sirpurkar, J.1. The Central Administrative Tribunal's order dismissing the original application filed by the petitioner herein is in challenge. While disposing of the original application, the tribunal relied on the order passed by it earlier...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskD. Rajagopal Vs. Tamil Nadu Small Industries Development Corporation L ...
Chennai
Mar-21-1986
Labour and Industrial
Companies Act; Service Rules - Rules 3 and 10(2)
[1987(54)FLR194]; (1986)IILLJ425Mad
ORDER1. Petitioner seeks for a declaration that R. 3. 10(2) of the Service Rules of respondent-Corporation, is illegal. 2. Already, dealing with the points arising in W.P. 2976 of 1985, it has been held that the...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNallakaruppan Chettiar Vs. Subbiah thevar
Chennai
Feb-11-1960
Criminal
Cattle Trespass Act - Sections 10 and 24; Madras Forest Act - Sections 26 and 32; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 355
AIR1960Mad331; 1960CriLJ932; (1960)IIMLJ455
ORDER(1) This is a revision preferred against the conviction and sentence by the learned Sub-Magistrate of Tirumayam in C. C. No. 37 of 1959, confirmed by the learned District Magistrate of Tiruchirapalli, in C. A. No....
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Palani Moopan
Chennai
Jan-01-1955
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 164, 288, 364 and 533; Madras High Court Criminal Practice Rules - Rule 85; Constitution of India - Article 20 and 20(3); Evidence Act - Sections 145
AIR1955Mad495; 1955CriLJ1197; (1953)2MLJ199
P.S. Kailasam, Adv.;R. Santhanam, Adv. for ;Public Prosecutor
Basheer Ahmed Sayeed, J.1. Palani Moopan, aged about 24, has been found guilty of murder of his wife, Karuppayee, aged about 20, on 26-1-19.54 at Kuppandampalayam, by inflicting injuries with a tapper's knife and has been...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: Ambalathil Assainar
Chennai
Apr-19-1955
Criminal
1956CriLJ244
Mack, J. 1. The appellant, a Mopla, has been found guilty under Section 302, I.P.C. of the murder of his wife, Pathu, aged 25, on 20-8-1954 sometime between 9-30 p.m. and 11-45 p.m., and sentenced to...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPacific India Trade Concern Vs. Commissioner of Customs (Prev)
Delhi
Feb-21-2014
MRTP
Mr. R. Santhanam, Mr. A. P. Sinha
$~15 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % DECIDED ON:21. 02.2014 + CUSAA62014 PACIFIC INDIA TRADE CONCERN ..... Appellant Through: Mr. R. Santhanam with Mr. A. P. Sinha, Advocates. versus COMMISSIONER OF...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskFinquick Finance (P.) Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Aug-25-2003
Direct Taxation
(2003)87ITD323(Delhi)
1. In this appeal, the assessee has objected to the order of the CIT(A) dated 31-1-2001 by way of following grounds : 1. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the impugned orders...
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- Next ›
- Last »