Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Judge: aikman j · Page 1 of about 80 results (0.016 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 15 1909

Emperor Vs. Umer-ud-din

Court : Allahabad

Judge : Aikman, J.

Decided on : Feb-15-1909

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1909)ILR31All317

Aikman, J.1. In my opinion no sufficient ground exists for interfering in this case. Mohammad Farookh, a soldier serving With his regiment in Burma, sent an intimation to the District Magistrate of Bijnor that he had...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 25 1906

Bhagwan Singh Vs. Harmukh and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Judge : Aikman, J.

Decided on : Oct-25-1906

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1907)ILR29All137

Aikman, J.1. The applicant filed a complaint in Court charging Harmukh and Baldeo with an offence under Section 457 of the Indian Penal Code. The Magistrate, without issuing process for the attendance of the persons complained...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 31 1969

Muhammad Safdar Husen Vs. Puren Chand and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Judge : Aikman, J.

Decided on : Dec-31-1969

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1898)ILR20All395

Aikman, J.1. This is an application asking this Court to transfer a civil suit now pending in the Court of the District Judge of Cawnpore to the Court of some native Subordinate Judge. The application is...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 31 1969

Queen-empress Vs. Punna and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Judge : Aikman, J.

Decided on : Dec-31-1969

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1896)ILR18All96

Aikman, J.1. This is a case reported by the learned Sessions Judge of Mainpuri for the orders of this Court. One Sham Lai brought a charge of theft against two men, Punna and Ruma. The charge...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 14 1907

Ram Sukh Vs. Ram Sahai

Court : Allahabad

Judge : Aikman, J.

Decided on : May-14-1907

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1907)ILR29All591

Aikman, J.1. One Chunni Lal had a simple money decree against the appellant Ram Sukh. In execution of that decree a house belonging to the appellant Ram Sukh was sold, and was purchased by the respondent...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 31 1969

Chiddo Vs. Piari Lal and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Judge : Aikman, J.

Decided on : Dec-31-1969

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1897)ILR19All188

Aikman, J.1. This appeal arises out of a suit brought by the plaintiff for the redemption of a mortgage. The plaintiff succeeded in the Court of First Instance, but on appeal the learned Subordinate Judge reversed...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 21 1908

Gorakh Prasad Vs. Mahadeo Prasad

Court : Allahabad

Judge : Aikman, J.

Decided on : Jul-21-1908

Subject : CivilProperty

Reported in : (1908)ILR30All547

Aikman, J.1. I agree with the judgment of the learned Chief Justice in Nepal Rai v. Debi Prasad (1905) I.L.R. 27 All. 447, which is against the appellant's contention. In my opinion the view expressed by...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 02 1909

Durga Pershad Vs. Hazari Lal and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Judge : Aikman, J.

Decided on : Apr-02-1909

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 1Ind.Cas.686

Aikman, J.1. The sole question for decision in this appeal, which arises out of a suit for pre-emption, is whether the clause in the Wajib-ul-arz upon, which the plaintiff's claim to pre-empt is based, is, as...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 14 1909

Baji Lal Vs. Gobardhan Singh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Judge : Aikman, J.

Decided on : Jan-14-1909

Subject : Civil

Reported in : 1Ind.Cas.1000

Aikman, J.1. The appellant Baji Lal sued to foreclose a mortgage. As a condition precedent to foreclosure, the Court below held that the appellant was bound to redeem a prior mortgage by payment of a sum...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 07 1909

Makund Ram and anr. Vs. Emperor

Court : Allahabad

Judge : Aikman, J.

Decided on : Apr-07-1909

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2Ind.Cas.226

Aikman, J.1. The applicants were convicted by a Magistrate of the first class of the offence of defamation and sentenced to a fine of Rs. 51 each or in default to 3 month's simple imprisonment. The...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial