Full Judgment
Aikman, J.
1. I agree with the judgment of the learned Chief Justice in Nepal Rai v. Debi Prasad (1905) I.L.R. 27 All. 447, which is against the appellant's contention. In my opinion the view expressed by the Taxing officer is right.
Gorakh Prasad Vs. Mahadeo Prasad
Gorakh Prasad vs Mahadeo Prasad
For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial
Brief this judgment before chambers
Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
- Citation
- sooperkanoon.com/460324
- Court
- Allahabad
- Judge
- Aikman, J.
- Decided On
- Jul 21, 1908
- Subject
- Civil;Property
Case Summary
AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.
Act No. VII of 1870 (Court Fees Act), Section 7, ix; Schedule I, Article 1 - Court fee--Decree for redemption of mortgage--Appeal on the main ground that nothing was due under the mortgage. -
- Key legal issue
- Civil;Property
Parties & Advocates
Appellant / Petitioner
Gorakh Prasad
Respondent
Mahadeo Prasad
Legal References
- Reported In
- (1908)ILR30All547
Excerpt
act no. vii of 1870 (court fees act), section 7, ix; schedule i, article 1 - court fee--decree for redemption of mortgage--appeal on the main ground that nothing was due under the mortgage. - aikman, j.1. i agree with the judgment of the learned chief justice in nepal rai v. debi prasad (1905) i.l.r. 27 all. 447, which is against the appellant's contention. in my opinion the view expressed by the taxing officer is right.