Advanced Search Results

S. Manian Vs. P.M. Nachimuthu

Court : Chennai

Subject : BankingCriminal

Acts : Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 -- Sections 138; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 -- Sections 2(A), 190(1), 200, 245, 460

Reported in : 2000(3)CTC680

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. S. Doraiswami and ;Mr. R. Karthikeyan, Government Adv.

ORDER1. The accused in Calendar Case No. 355 of 1997 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate, Palladam is the revision petitioner. The respondent in this revision is the complainant therein. That was a private complaint...

Hidayathullah Vs. Appellate Authority (Rent Controller) Iii Judge, Cou ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 - Sections 18(1) and 18(2); ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 144

Reported in : AIR1986Mad30

Advocate for Respondent : S. Doraiswami, Adv.

ORDER1. When the W. M. Ps. came up for final order, the counsel on both sides agreed for the disposal of the writ petition itself. Hence the writ petition was taken up for disposal.2. This petition...

S. Mohan Vs. Govt. of Tamil Nadu and anr.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Tamil Nadu Housing Service Regulations, 1969 - Regulation 37; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 161

Reported in : (1994)ILLJ1241Mad; (1993)IMLJ504

Advocate for Respondent : P. Balasubramaniam, Addl. Govt. Pleader for Respondent No. 1 and ;;S. Doraiswamy, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2

K.S. Bakthavatsalam, J.1. The petitioner challenges the order of the second respondent dated August 27, 1989 by which the petitioner has been removed from the services of the second respondent Board. The petitioner and one Kesavan...

MUTHURAJA Vs The Tahsildar

Court : Chennai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 25-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA1. Muthuraja D.No.91, street, of Agathikal Mugam Village2. Ramakrishnan 141, Palar Anaicut SLR camp, Thirumalaicheri ..Petitioner(s) Vs2. Kamaladevi3. Pushpadevi Page1 of 4 ..Respondent(s)Prayer:...

M/S.Ar Constructions vs the Superintending Engineer (H)

Court : Chennai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 05-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA M/s.AR Constructions No.727 East Kattukottai Naduvalur Post, Gangavalli Taluk Salem District - 636 105. Rep. by its Partner A.Anand. ..Petitioner(s) Vs ..Respondent(s)PRAYER...

M/S.Ar Constructions vs the Superintending Engineer (H)

Court : Chennai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 05-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA M/s.AR Constructions No.727 East Kattukottai Naduvalur Post, Gangavalli Taluk Salem District - 636 105. Rep. by its Partner A.Anand. ..Petitioner(s) Vs ..Respondent(s)PRAYER...

M/S.Br Constructions vs the Superintending Engineer (H)

Court : Chennai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 05-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA M/s.BR Constructions No.133, NH 45, GST ROAD Vallancheri, GuduvancherRY Chennai 603 202, Rep. by its Partner P.Balaji. ..Petitioner(s) Vs ..Respondent(s)PRAYER : Writ...

M/S.Br Constructions vs the Superintending Engineer (H)

Court : Chennai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 05-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA M/s.BR Constructions No.133, NH 45, GST ROAD Vallancheri, GuduvancherRY Chennai 603 202, Rep. by its Partner P.Balaji. ..Petitioner(s) Vs ..Respondent(s)PRAYER : Writ...

RAMAKRISHNAN Vs The State of Tamil nadu

Court : Chennai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 10-02-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA WP No. 4635 of 2026 AND WMP NO. 5157 OF 20261. Ramakrishnan2. Chinnavan3. Chinnamari4. Thangaraj5. Marappan ..Petitioner(s) Vs1. The State of Tamil...

SudIn M. Sangodcar Vs. State of Goa, Through the Chief Secretary and a ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 233 and 239; Bombay (Extension of Jurisdiction to Goa, Daman and Diu) Act, 1981 - Sections 5; Goa, Daman and Diu Civil Services (Judicial Branch) Rules, 1992 - Rules 10 and 17; Goa Judicial Services Rules, 1985

Reported in : 1997(1)BomCR165

Advocate for Respondent : V.B. Nadkarni, Adv. G. and H.R. Bharne, Addl. Gov. Adv. for respondent No. 1 in W.Ps. 4, 6 and 7, G.U. Bhobe, Gov. Adv. for respondent No. 2 in W.Ps. 4, 6

P.S. Patankar, J.1. All these three writ petitions can be disposed of by this common judgment as the facts involved are same and also the points.2. In these petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of...