Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

M/S.Br Constructions vs the Superintending Engineer (H)

M/S.Br Constructions vs The Superintending Engineer (H)

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Feb 05, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1422090

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/4070/2026

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

M/S.Br Constructions

Respondent

The Superintending Engineer (H)

Excerpt

.....20.01.2026 on the file of the 1st respondent and pass.page1 of 4 for petitioner(s): mr.s.doraiswamy for respondent(s): mr.yogesh kannadasan special government pleader for r1 & r2orderthe above writ petition has been filed seeking a mandamus to the second respondent to issue work site inspection certificate and plant and machineries certificate to the petitioner-company so to enable them to participate in the bids with respect to sl.no.3 of the tender notification in tender notice no.64/2025-2026/hdo, dated 20.01.2026, through online before the scheduled date i.e., 07.02.2026.2. when the matter is taken up for hearing today, mr. yogesh kannadasan,learned special government pleader appearing for respondents 1 and 2 would submit that the said certificates have been issued to the petitioner. the said statement is also conceded by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.3. considering the fact that the work site inspection certificate and plantand machineries certificate have been issued to the petitioner and the same has page2 of 4 also been conceded by the petitioner’s counsel, nothing survives for consideration in the present writ petition. accordingly, the writ petition stands closed. no costs. index: yes/nospeaking/non-speaking orderneutral citation: yes/no ds to: page3 of 4 p.t.asha j. ds page4 of 4

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 05-02-2026

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA M/s.BR Constructions No.133, NH 45, GST ROAD Vallancheri, Guduvancher RY Chennai 603 202, Rep. by its Partner P.Balaji. ..Petitioner(s) Vs ..Respondent(s)

PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent to issue Work Site Inspection Certificate and Working condition of the Plants and Machineries Certificates of the petitioner as per the application of the petitioner dated 02.02.2026 (through e-mail) in order to submit his bids through online on or before 07.02.2026 upto 11.00 Hrs for the work in Sl.No.3 of the Tender Notification in Tender Notice No. 64/2025-2026/HDO, dated 20.01.2026 on the file of the 1st respondent and pass.

Page1 of 4 For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.Doraiswamy For Respondent(s): Mr.Yogesh Kannadasan Special Government Pleader for R1 & R2

ORDER

The above writ petition has been filed seeking a mandamus to the second respondent to issue Work Site Inspection Certificate and Plant and Machineries Certificate to the petitioner-Company so to enable them to participate in the bids with respect to Sl.No.3 of the Tender Notification in Tender Notice No.64/2025-2026/HDO, dated 20.01.2026, through online before the scheduled date i.e., 07.02.2026.

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing today, Mr. Yogesh Kannadasan,

learned Special Government Pleader appearing for respondents 1 and 2 would submit that the said certificates have been issued to the petitioner. The said statement is also conceded by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.

3. Considering the fact that the Work Site Inspection Certificate and Plant

and Machineries Certificate have been issued to the petitioner and the same has Page2 of 4 also been conceded by the petitioner’s counsel, nothing survives for consideration in the present writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed. No costs. Index: Yes/No

Speaking/Non-speaking order

Neutral Citation: Yes/No DS To: Page3 of 4 P.T.ASHA J. DS Page4 of 4

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2026 Same Parties M/S.Br Constructions vs The Superintending Engineer (H) Same Judge Honourable Ms. Justice P.T. Asha
Government pleader With respect to Speaking order In order to high court Has been ad val

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales