Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Defendent: rakesh kumar and · Page 1 of about 7,443 results (0.448 seconds)

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 28 2012

Om Kr. Dhankar Vs. State of Haryana and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-28-2012

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 420, 406, 161, 409 427; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Section 13(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.) 1973 - Section 197,

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Anis Ahmed Khan

 R.M. LODHA, J.1. Leave granted.2. The complainant is in appeal, by special leave, aggrieved by the order dated May 17, 2007 of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana whereby the single Judge of that Court...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 21 2002

Mary Rasul Vs. Isahak Ali

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Mar-21-2002

Subject : Election

Acts : Election Law; Representation of People Act, 1951 - Sections 33(6); Election Symbols (Reservation and Allotment) Order, 1968 - Order 13A; General Clauses Act; Constitution of India - Article 324

Advocate for Respondent : M.A. Sheikh, A. Begum, P. Saikia and B. Choudhury, Advs.

Ranjan Gogoi, J. 1. By means of the present election petition, the petitioner has called into question the election of the respondent No. 1 to the Assam Legislative Assembly from the No. 44, Jania Legislative Assembly...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 09 2009

Tika Ram and ors. Etc. Etc. Vs. State of U.P. and ors. Etc. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-09-2009

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1A), 3A, 3(3A)(3), 3B, 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5, 5A, 5(4), 6, 6(1), 6(2), 7, 8, 9, 9(1), 11, 11A, 17, 17(1), 17(1A), 17(2), 17(3), 17(3A), 17(4), 17(4A), 18, 23(1A), 34 and 48; Land Acquisition (Uttar Pradesh Amendment and Validation) Act, 1991 - Sections 1, 2, 2(4), 3 and 4; Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984; Rajasthan Urban Improvement Act, 1987; Taxation on Income (Investigation Commission) Act, 1947; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 21, 39, 48, 48A, 141, 226, 245, 246, 254(2), 254(3) and 300A; Land Acquisition (Uttar Pradesh Amendment and Validation) Ordinance, 1990

Reported in : JT2009(12)SC1; 2009(12)SCALE349; (2009)10SCC689:2009AIRSCW6465

V.S. Sirpurkar, J.Background of Appeals1. This judgment will dispose of Civil Appeal Nos. 2650-2652 of 1998, 3162 of 1998, 3176 of 1998, 3415 of 1998, 3561 of 1998, 3597 of 1998, 3923 of 1998, 3939 of...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 06 2001

Hindustan Ferro and Industries Ltd. and anr. Vs. Debt Recovery Tribuna ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-06-2001

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Recovery of Debt to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 - Sections 18, 19 and 20

Reported in : [2003]113CompCas58(All); (2001)2UPLBEC1088

Advocate for Respondent : S.C. and ;Satish Chaturvedi, Adv.

ORDERO.P. Garg, J.1. The woodcut profile of the case of the petitioner No. 1, a company duly registered under the Companies Act, carrying on the business of manufacturing Ferro Silicon and of which the petitioner No....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 29 2004

Ram Kumar Gupta Vs. A.D.J. (E.C. Act) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-29-2004

Subject : Civil

Acts : Rent Control Act; Transfer of Property Act; Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rules 1 and 2

Reported in : 2005(2)AWC2375

Advocate for Respondent : R.K. Srivastava, C.S.C.

A.N. Varma, J.1. Through the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for quashing of the judgment and orders dated 29.9.2004 as well as 24.5.2001 passed by opposite parties...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 30 2008

Karan Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : May-30-2008

Subject : Service

Reported in : RLW2008(4)Raj3329

Gopal Krishan Vyas, J.1. In this case, the petitioner has prayed for direction to the respondents to grant pension w.e.f. 1.2.1979 and pay him all consequential benefits along with interest @ 18% per annum.2. As per...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 26 2011

Ajay Kumar Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Court : Jharkhand

Decided on : May-26-2011

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 341, 323, 324, 326/34

1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner Ajay Kumar has been made accused for the offence under Section 341, 323, 324, 326 / 34 of the Indian Penal...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 21 2001

Cauvery Achayya and ors. Vs. Shri Syed Mukthar

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Sep-21-2001

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 2 and 12; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 47 - Order 21, Rules 97 and 98; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 438

Reported in : 2001CriLJ4532

Advocate for Respondent : L.S. Chikkanagoudar, Adv.

ORDER1. In these petitions filed under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), the complainants have prayed for an order punishing the first respondent for willfully disobeying the...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 04 2006

Raj Kumar and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-04-2006

Subject : Service

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 19 and 19(1); Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 - Rules 26 and 49; Constitution of India - Article 142

Reported in : AIR2006SC938; [2006(1)JCR278(SC)]; JT2006(1)SC49; 2006(1)SCALE67; (2006)1SCC737; 2006(2)SLJ195(SC)

B.N. Srikrishna, J.1. The writ petitions in this group arise from the same set of facts and seek the same relief. They can conveniently be disposed of by a common judgment.2. For the purpose of facts,...

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 2005

Ram Chand Sharma Vs. Thakur Dass

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-30-2005

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973

Reported in : (2006)142PLR69

Advocate for Respondent : Arun Jain, Adv.

ORDERViney Mittal, J.1. The tenant is the petitioner before this Court. He has impugned the orders of ejectment from the shop in question passed by the learned Rent Controller and upheld by the learned Appellate Authority.2....

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial