Advanced Search Results

Jiwan Mal Kochar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1983SC1102; (1983)4SCC148

A. Varadarajan, J.1. This appeal by special leave is by the appellant in Letters Patent Appeal 119 of 1971 which was dismissed by the Delhi High Court. The L.P.A. was filed by the appellant against the...

inder and anr. Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 392 and 397

Reported in : 23(1983)DLT428

Advocate for Respondent : Harish Gulati and ; I.U. Khan, Advs.

N.N. Goswamy, J.1. This judgment will also dispose of Criminal Appeal No. 69 of 1982 as both these appeals arise out of the same trial and judgment. The appellants, Inder and Bishamber in Cr. A. No....

A.N. Nigam Vs. University of Jodhpur and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 19(1)

Reported in : AIR1982Raj243; 1982()WLN384

ORDERG.M. Lodha, J.1. 'A storm over a cup of tea', but though 'cup of tea' was over, the storm has assumed serious disastrous dimensions for the petitioner resulting in his suspension and inquiry. The academicians, either...

Siddharth S/O Atchutrao Sawant Vs. State (Through Public Prosecutor)

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 376; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 8, 27, 32, 45, 59, 61, 114, 118, 145 and 155; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 154, 161 and 162;

Reported in : 2000(5)BomCR673; 2000BomCR(Cri)673; 2000(3)MhLj46

Advocate for Respondent : A.P. Lawande, P.P.

ORDERR.M.S. Khandeparkar, J. 1. This criminal appeal arises from the judgment and order convicting the appellant-accused under section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and sentencing him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years imprisonment. It...

Umed Singh Vs. Bahadur Singh and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1980WLN276

G.M. Lodha, J.1. The emblem or symbol of 'Justice' is 'Balance' or 'Scales' A Judge is required to maintain it 'even' mericulously and not to allow it to 'tilt' on any consideration whatsoever. 'Tilting of the...

Akshansh Gupta vs.department of Science & Technology & Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Lekh Raj Singh

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:15. h January, 2019 Pronounced on:12. h April, 2019 + W.P.(C) 1748/2018 & CM APPLs. 7241/2018, 7242/2018 AKSHANSH GUPTA ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Sadiya...

Union of India & Anr vs Amiya Kumar Jena, Idas & Anr

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

Advocate for Respondent : Mr. S. C. Saxena, Mr. Ravinder Agarwal, Mr. Manish Kumar Singh, Mr. Vasu Agarwal, Mr. Lekh Raj Singh

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 1688/2017 and CM APPL. 7558/2017 UNION OF INDIA & ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Kamal Kant Jha, CGSC with Mr. Avinash Singh, Mr. Aishwarya Deep Singh...

Sugan Chand Vs. Dina Nath and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, (1882) - Sections 66; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 39, Rule 1

Reported in : AIR1980Raj121; 1979()WLN703

Advocate for Respondent : Lekh Raj Mehta, Adv.

Lodha, C. J.1. This is an appeal under Order 43, Rule 1 (r) of the Code of Civil procedure, from the order dated April 20, 1979, by the Additional District Judge, Sri Ganganagar, whereby the learned...

JainaraIn Jeevraj Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax (No. 2)

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 254, 254(2) and 256(2)

Reported in : (1979)13CTR(Raj)342; [1980]121ITR359(Raj); 1979(12)WLN625

Advocate for Respondent : Lekh Raj Mehta, Adv.

C.M. Lodha, C.J.1. Two connected applications were made by the assessee under Section 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter to be referred to as 'the Act'), against the order dated September 30, 1975, by the...

Rajasthan Mineral and Co., Jaipur Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 - Rule 24

Reported in : AIR1973Raj289; 1973()WLN233

Advocate for Respondent : Lekh Raj Mehta and S.C. Bhandari, Advs.

ORDERV.P. Tyagi, J.1. This writ petition filed by the Rajasthan Mineral & Company, Jaipur, against the order of the Central Government dated 16th May, 1972 (Annexure 1) raises an important question as to when the application...