Union of India & Anr vs Amiya Kumar Jena, Idas & Anr

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Feb 16, 2026

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1270079

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1270079
Court: Delhi High Court
Judge: Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal,Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Amit Mahajan
Decided On: Feb 16, 2026
Case Number: W.P.(C)/1688/2017
Subject: Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue: Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Union of India & Anr

Advocate Mr. Kamal Kant Jha, Mr. Avinash Singh, Mr. Aishwarya Deep Singh, Ms. Aakriti

Respondent

Amiya Kumar Jena, Idas & Anr

Advocate Mr. S. C. Saxena, Mr. Ravinder Agarwal, Mr. Manish Kumar Singh, Mr. Vasu Agarwal, Mr. Lekh Raj Singh

Excerpt

* in the high court of delhi at new delhi+ w.p.(c) 1688/2017 and cm appl. 7558/2017 union of india & anr .....petitioners through: mr. kamal kant jha, cgsc with mr. avinash singh, mr. aishwarya deep singh & ms. aakriti, advs.versusamiya kumar jena, idas & anr .....respondents through: mr. s. c. saxena, adv. for r-1. mr. ravinder agarwal, mr. manish kumar singh, mr. vasu agarwal and mr. lekh raj singh, advs. for r-2/upsc.coram:hon'ble mr. justice anil kshetarpalhon'ble mr. justice amit mahajanorder% 16.02.20261. learned counsel representing the parties submits that therespondent no.1 has already demitted office upon attaining the age of superannuation and that the order passed by the tribunal has already been implemented. hence, they submit that no further orders in the writ petition are required to be passed.2. in view of the statements made by learned counsel for the parties and in light of the fact that the order of the tribunal stands implemented, nothing survives for adjudication in the present writ petition.3. accordingly, the present petition, along with the pending application, is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.anil kshetarpal, j.amit mahajan, j.february 16, 2026/sp/hr

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) 1688/2017 and CM APPL. 7558/2017 UNION OF INDIA & ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Kamal Kant Jha, CGSC with Mr. Avinash Singh, Mr. Aishwarya Deep Singh & Ms. Aakriti, Advs.
versus
AMIYA KUMAR JENA, IDAS & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. S. C. Saxena, Adv. for R-1. Mr. Ravinder Agarwal, Mr. Manish Kumar Singh, Mr. Vasu Agarwal and Mr. Lekh Raj Singh, Advs. for R-2/UPSC.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN

ORDER

% 16.02.2026

1. Learned counsel representing the parties submits that the

Respondent No.1 has already demitted office upon attaining the age of superannuation and that the order passed by the Tribunal has already been implemented. Hence, they submit that no further orders in the writ petition are required to be passed.

2. In view of the statements made by learned counsel for the parties and in light of the fact that the order of the Tribunal stands implemented, nothing survives for adjudication in the present writ petition.

3. Accordingly, the present petition, along with the pending application, is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.

ANIL KSHETARPAL, J.

AMIT MAHAJAN, J.

FEBRUARY 16, 2026/sp/hr

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2026 Same Parties Union of India & Anr vs Amiya Kumar Jena, Idas & Anr Same Subject Right to Information Same Judge Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Anil Kshetarpal,Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Amit ...