Advanced Search Results

Jaswant Singh and anr. Vs. State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 145, 146 and 146(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39, Rules 1, 2 and 2(3)

Reported in : 1998CriLJ1135

Advocate for Respondent : Arun Sanghi, Adv.

ORDERR.L. Anand, J.1. Present is a revision filed by Sukhwant Singh and Jaswant Singh and it has been directed against the order dated 10th July, 1996 passed by the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, Patiala, who...

Jagbir Singh Vs. Hukam Chand

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Civil

Acts : Indian Stamp Act, 1899

Reported in : (2006)143PLR66

Advocate for Respondent : Arun Sanghi, Adv.

Ashutosh Mohunta, J.1. Jagir Singh defendant has filed this appeal wherein challenge has been made to the judgment and decree dated 22.9.1999 passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Patiala, decreeing the suit for recovery filed...

Bhupinder Singh Vs. Manpreet Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 - Sections 13

Reported in : (2004)136PLR621

Advocate for Respondent : Arun Sanghi, Adv.

M.M. Kumar, J. 1. This petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution challenges order dated 23.4.2003 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Patiala concurring with the order dated 9.9.2003 passed by the Civil Judge...

Fao No.M-179 of 2001 (O and M) Vs. Anita

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Family

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No.M-179 of 2001 (O & M) Date of decision: 08.05.2014 Rajinder Kumar ....Appellant Versus Anita ....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE S.S.SARON HON'BLE Ms.JUSTICE NAVITA SINGH Present:...

Gurprit Singh Vs. Ranjit Kaur Widow of Raj Kulwant Singh and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 151 - Order 5, Rules 17 and 20 - Order 9, Rule 13

Reported in : AIR1997P& H282; (1997)117PLR29

Advocate for Respondent : Arun Sanghi, Adv.

ORDER1. This application has been filed by respondent under Section 151, Code of Civil Procedure for recalling the ex parte order dated 13-2-1996 passed by this Court. In this application it has been stated that the...

Radhey Sham Vs. Gobind Lal and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 21, 47, 99 and 115; Suits Valuation Act - Sections 11

Reported in : AIR1990P& H62

Advocate for Respondent : Ashok Aggarwal, Sr. Adv. and; Arun Sanghi, Adv.

ORDER1. This revision petition is directed against the order of the learned Executing Court whereby he held that the decree will not be executed since it was not passed by the competent Court.2. Brief facts:-- A...

Simon-carves India Ltd. Vs. Punjab Sulphur Products Ltd.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433, 434 and 439

Reported in : [1987]62CompCas214(P& H)

Advocate for Respondent : G.R. Majithia and; Arun Sanghi, Advs.

Rajendra Nath Mtttal, J.1. This is a petition under Sections 433, 434 and 439 of the Companies Act for winding up of Messrs. Punjab Sulphur Products Limited, Chandigarh (respondent). It is pleaded that the respondent-company is...

Tata Chemicals Ltd. Vs. Stepan Chemicals Ltd. and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 101(3)

Reported in : [1987]62CompCas855(P& H)

Advocate for Respondent : G.R. Majithia and; Arun Sanghi, Advs.

S.P. Goyal, J.1. Company Petition No. 98 of 1981 was filed against M/s. Stepan Chemicals Ltd., respondent No. 1, for its winding up. During its pendency, the petitioners, M/s. Tata Chemicals Ltd., moved this application for...

Delhi Cloth and General Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. Stepan Chemicals Limited

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 439

Reported in : [1986]60CompCas1046(P& H)

Advocate for Respondent : G.R. Majithia and; Arun Sanghi, Advs.

Rajendra Nath Mittal, J. 1. Briefly the facts are that the petitioner supplied goods of the value of Rs. 1,52,708 to the respondent from November 28, 1979, till June 25, 1980. The respondent did not make...

Hanuman Vs. Som Dutt

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973 - Sections 13

Reported in : (1990)97PLR504

Advocate for Respondent : Ashok Kumar, Sr. Adv. and; Arun Sanghi, Adv.

M.S. Liberhan, J.1. The ejectment of the petitioner was sought on a number of grounds, but was ordered on the ground that the demised premises were required by the landlord for his own use and occupation....