Citation network
Ward Vs. Love County
Cites for this judgment
- US Supreme Court
- Apr 25, 1920
Citation network · 7-day free trial
Brief every cited case in minutes
Open an 18-section AI Brief on any citation below, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial - no card required.
- 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
- Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
- Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
- Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account
-
Ward v. LoveSearch
-
County - 253 U.S. 17 (1920) U.S. Supreme Court Ward v. LoveSearch
-
County, 253 U.S. 17 (1920) Ward v. BoardSearch
-
which they were defendants, were being litigated in behalf of all such allottees, to maintain the exemption ( Choate v. TrappSearch
-
A judgment for the claimants followed, and this was reversed by the supreme court. Board of Commr's of Love County v. WardSearch
-
state courts, being of opinion that the exemption had been repealed by Congress, sustained the power to tax. English v. RichardsonSearch
-
authorities in Oklahoma, and that the state courts had erred in refusing to enjoin them from taxing the lands. Choate v. TrappSearch
-
not elapsed since the date of the patents, it is certain that the lands were nontaxable. This was settled in Choate v. TrappSearch
-
Brief any citation in this list with AI Studio
-
putting forward nonfederal grounds of decision that were without any fair or substantial support. Union Pacific R. Co. v. PublicSearch
-
Vandalia R. Co. v. SouthSearch
-
Gaar, Scott & Co. v. ShannonSearch
-
Creswill v. KnightsSearch
-
Enterprise Irrigation District v. Farmers'Search
-
Boyd v. ThayerSearch
-
may be thus put forward successfully, our power to review easily may be avoided. Terre Haute & Indianapolis R. Co. v. IndianaSearch
-
reasonably could not have regarded it otherwise, much less the Indian claimants. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. O'ConnorSearch
-
Union Pacific R. Co. v. PublicSearch
-
Swift Co. v. UnitedSearch
-
Robertson v. FrankSearch
-
U. S. 320 , 214 U. S. 329 . The county places some reliance on Lamborn v. CountySearch
-
Commissioners, 97 U. S. 181 , and Railroad v. CommissionersSearch
-
Marsh v. FultonSearch
-
City of Louisiana v. WoodSearch
-
Chapman v. CountySearch
-
to others whose rights it knew were disputed and were no better than its own. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. O'ConnorSearch
-
U.S. Supreme Court Ward v. LoveSearch
-
Ward v. BoardSearch
-
Board of Commr's of Love County v. WardSearch
-
Terre Haute & Indianapolis R. Co. v. IndianaSearch
-
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. O'ConnorSearch
-
Lamborn v. CountySearch
-
and Railroad v. CommissionersSearch
AI Brief on cited cases - 7-day free trial